CT筛查对肺癌的影响:科学证据和文献综述

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Kathleen Kennedy , Alicia Hulbert , Mary Pasquinelli , Lawrence E. Feldman
{"title":"CT筛查对肺癌的影响:科学证据和文献综述","authors":"Kathleen Kennedy ,&nbsp;Alicia Hulbert ,&nbsp;Mary Pasquinelli ,&nbsp;Lawrence E. Feldman","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The treatment of lung cancer has improved significantly in recent years however, lung cancer remains as a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Lung cancer screening has been explored, over the past several decades, as a means of reducing lung cancer mortality, to identify asymptomatic disease when it is potentially curable. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) established that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans of the chest can be instrumental in reducing lung cancer mortality but the criteria for screening implemented in this trial may not be equitably sensitive across racial and sex subpopulations. Furthermore, the high false detection rate reported in this trial has raised concerns regarding overdiagnosis with LDCT alone. The aim of this review is to summarize the history of lung cancer screening trials, limitations of lung cancer screening, the impact of alternative risk prediction models in reducing disparities, and the use of biomarkers in conjunction with imaging to improve diagnostic authenticity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":"49 3","pages":"Pages 198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775422000537/pdfft?md5=b6b6e3c6f67d248fd18599a8b8307eb8&pid=1-s2.0-S0093775422000537-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of CT screening in lung cancer: Scientific evidence and literature review\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Kennedy ,&nbsp;Alicia Hulbert ,&nbsp;Mary Pasquinelli ,&nbsp;Lawrence E. Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The treatment of lung cancer has improved significantly in recent years however, lung cancer remains as a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Lung cancer screening has been explored, over the past several decades, as a means of reducing lung cancer mortality, to identify asymptomatic disease when it is potentially curable. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) established that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans of the chest can be instrumental in reducing lung cancer mortality but the criteria for screening implemented in this trial may not be equitably sensitive across racial and sex subpopulations. Furthermore, the high false detection rate reported in this trial has raised concerns regarding overdiagnosis with LDCT alone. The aim of this review is to summarize the history of lung cancer screening trials, limitations of lung cancer screening, the impact of alternative risk prediction models in reducing disparities, and the use of biomarkers in conjunction with imaging to improve diagnostic authenticity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 198-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775422000537/pdfft?md5=b6b6e3c6f67d248fd18599a8b8307eb8&pid=1-s2.0-S0093775422000537-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775422000537\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775422000537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

近年来,肺癌的治疗有了显著的改善,然而,肺癌仍然是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因。在过去的几十年里,人们一直在探索肺癌筛查,作为降低肺癌死亡率的一种手段,在潜在可治愈的情况下识别无症状疾病。国家肺部筛查试验(NLST)证实,胸部低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)扫描有助于降低肺癌死亡率,但在该试验中实施的筛查标准在种族和性别亚群中可能不公平敏感。此外,该试验中报告的高误检率引起了对单独使用LDCT过度诊断的担忧。本综述的目的是总结肺癌筛查试验的历史,肺癌筛查的局限性,替代风险预测模型在减少差异方面的影响,以及生物标志物与影像学结合使用以提高诊断真实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of CT screening in lung cancer: Scientific evidence and literature review

The treatment of lung cancer has improved significantly in recent years however, lung cancer remains as a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Lung cancer screening has been explored, over the past several decades, as a means of reducing lung cancer mortality, to identify asymptomatic disease when it is potentially curable. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) established that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans of the chest can be instrumental in reducing lung cancer mortality but the criteria for screening implemented in this trial may not be equitably sensitive across racial and sex subpopulations. Furthermore, the high false detection rate reported in this trial has raised concerns regarding overdiagnosis with LDCT alone. The aim of this review is to summarize the history of lung cancer screening trials, limitations of lung cancer screening, the impact of alternative risk prediction models in reducing disparities, and the use of biomarkers in conjunction with imaging to improve diagnostic authenticity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信