头颈部皮肤黑色素瘤的质子治疗效果:质子合作小组分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2022-07-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14338/IJPT-22-00003.1
James E Han, Alicia Lozano, Shaakir Hasan, J Isabelle Choi, Arpit M Chhabra, Henry Tsai, Nasiruddin Mohammed, Samir Patel, Sanford Katz, John H Chang, Charles B Simone, Robert H Press
{"title":"头颈部皮肤黑色素瘤的质子治疗效果:质子合作小组分析。","authors":"James E Han, Alicia Lozano, Shaakir Hasan, J Isabelle Choi, Arpit M Chhabra, Henry Tsai, Nasiruddin Mohammed, Samir Patel, Sanford Katz, John H Chang, Charles B Simone, Robert H Press","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-22-00003.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reports of proton beam therapy (PBT) utilization for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (HN) region is virtually non-existent. This study reports on the efficacy and acute toxicities of PBT for primary HN cutaneous melanoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We queried the prospectively collected, multi-institutional Proton Collaborative Group registry for all consecutive patients with HN cutaneous melanoma receiving PBT from May 2010 to December 2019. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local regional recurrence free survival (LRFS). Toxicity was reported per CTCAE version 4.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 patients were identified with a median age of 69 (range, 37-88). All patients (100%) underwent surgery followed with postoperative PBT. There were 3 patients (37.5%) with T3 or T4 disease and 4 (50%) with N2 or N3 disease. The median radiation dose was 46 GyRBE (range, 27-70) and median dose per fraction was 2.4 GyRBE (range, 2.0-6.0) with the most common dose fractionation being 44 or 48 GyRBE in 20 fractions (n = 4). At a median follow-up of 40.1 months (range, 1.6-62.4) the 1 and 3 year OS rates were 85.7% and 35.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 25.40 months (95% CI, 2.53-58.70) while PFS at 1 year and 3 years was 85.7% and 35.7%, respectively. LRFS was 100% at 1 year and 85.7% at 3 years. Five of the 8 patients developed distant metastases, of which 3 received immunotherapy. Acute G2+ and G3+ toxicities occurred in 5 of 8 patients and 2 of 8 patients, respectively. G3 toxicities included radiation dermatitis (n = 1) and immunotherapy-related rash (n = 1). No G4+ toxicities were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single modality PBT for HN melanomas in the definitive setting provides effective and durable local control rates with tolerable acute toxicity. Distant failure remains the primary pattern of failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"9 2","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proton Therapy Outcomes for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma: Proton Collaborative Group Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"James E Han, Alicia Lozano, Shaakir Hasan, J Isabelle Choi, Arpit M Chhabra, Henry Tsai, Nasiruddin Mohammed, Samir Patel, Sanford Katz, John H Chang, Charles B Simone, Robert H Press\",\"doi\":\"10.14338/IJPT-22-00003.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reports of proton beam therapy (PBT) utilization for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (HN) region is virtually non-existent. This study reports on the efficacy and acute toxicities of PBT for primary HN cutaneous melanoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We queried the prospectively collected, multi-institutional Proton Collaborative Group registry for all consecutive patients with HN cutaneous melanoma receiving PBT from May 2010 to December 2019. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local regional recurrence free survival (LRFS). Toxicity was reported per CTCAE version 4.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 patients were identified with a median age of 69 (range, 37-88). All patients (100%) underwent surgery followed with postoperative PBT. There were 3 patients (37.5%) with T3 or T4 disease and 4 (50%) with N2 or N3 disease. The median radiation dose was 46 GyRBE (range, 27-70) and median dose per fraction was 2.4 GyRBE (range, 2.0-6.0) with the most common dose fractionation being 44 or 48 GyRBE in 20 fractions (n = 4). At a median follow-up of 40.1 months (range, 1.6-62.4) the 1 and 3 year OS rates were 85.7% and 35.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 25.40 months (95% CI, 2.53-58.70) while PFS at 1 year and 3 years was 85.7% and 35.7%, respectively. LRFS was 100% at 1 year and 85.7% at 3 years. Five of the 8 patients developed distant metastases, of which 3 received immunotherapy. Acute G2+ and G3+ toxicities occurred in 5 of 8 patients and 2 of 8 patients, respectively. G3 toxicities included radiation dermatitis (n = 1) and immunotherapy-related rash (n = 1). No G4+ toxicities were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single modality PBT for HN melanomas in the definitive setting provides effective and durable local control rates with tolerable acute toxicity. Distant failure remains the primary pattern of failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Particle Therapy\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"40-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415747/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Particle Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00003.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00003.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于质子束疗法(PBT)用于头颈部(HN)皮肤黑色素瘤的报道几乎没有。本研究报告了质子束疗法治疗原发性 HN 皮肤黑色素瘤的疗效和急性毒性:我们查询了前瞻性收集的多机构质子协作组登记册,其中包括 2010 年 5 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受 PBT 治疗的所有连续 HN 皮肤黑色素瘤患者。采用卡普兰-梅耶法估算总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和局部区域无复发生存期(LRFS)。根据 CTCAE 4.0 版报告毒性:共发现 8 名患者,中位年龄为 69 岁(37-88 岁不等)。所有患者(100%)都接受了手术,术后进行了 PBT。其中 3 名患者(37.5%)患有 T3 或 T4 病变,4 名患者(50%)患有 N2 或 N3 病变。中位放射剂量为 46 GyRBE(范围为 27-70),每分次中位剂量为 2.4 GyRBE(范围为 2.0-6.0),最常见的剂量分次为 44 或 48 GyRBE,分 20 次进行(n = 4)。中位随访时间为 40.1 个月(1.6-62.4 个月),1 年和 3 年的 OS 率分别为 85.7% 和 35.7%。中位 PFS 为 25.40 个月(95% CI,2.53-58.70),1 年和 3 年的 PFS 分别为 85.7% 和 35.7%。1年和3年的LRFS分别为100%和85.7%。8名患者中有5人出现远处转移,其中3人接受了免疫疗法。急性G2+和G3+毒性反应分别发生在8名患者中的5名和2名。G3毒性包括放射性皮炎(1例)和免疫疗法相关皮疹(1例)。未报告G4+毒性:结论:对HN黑色素瘤进行单模式PBT治疗可提供有效、持久的局部控制率,且急性毒性可耐受。远处治疗失败仍是主要的失败模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Proton Therapy Outcomes for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma: Proton Collaborative Group Analysis.

Proton Therapy Outcomes for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma: Proton Collaborative Group Analysis.

Proton Therapy Outcomes for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma: Proton Collaborative Group Analysis.

Proton Therapy Outcomes for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma: Proton Collaborative Group Analysis.

Purpose: Reports of proton beam therapy (PBT) utilization for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (HN) region is virtually non-existent. This study reports on the efficacy and acute toxicities of PBT for primary HN cutaneous melanoma.

Materials and methods: We queried the prospectively collected, multi-institutional Proton Collaborative Group registry for all consecutive patients with HN cutaneous melanoma receiving PBT from May 2010 to December 2019. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local regional recurrence free survival (LRFS). Toxicity was reported per CTCAE version 4.0.

Results: A total of 8 patients were identified with a median age of 69 (range, 37-88). All patients (100%) underwent surgery followed with postoperative PBT. There were 3 patients (37.5%) with T3 or T4 disease and 4 (50%) with N2 or N3 disease. The median radiation dose was 46 GyRBE (range, 27-70) and median dose per fraction was 2.4 GyRBE (range, 2.0-6.0) with the most common dose fractionation being 44 or 48 GyRBE in 20 fractions (n = 4). At a median follow-up of 40.1 months (range, 1.6-62.4) the 1 and 3 year OS rates were 85.7% and 35.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 25.40 months (95% CI, 2.53-58.70) while PFS at 1 year and 3 years was 85.7% and 35.7%, respectively. LRFS was 100% at 1 year and 85.7% at 3 years. Five of the 8 patients developed distant metastases, of which 3 received immunotherapy. Acute G2+ and G3+ toxicities occurred in 5 of 8 patients and 2 of 8 patients, respectively. G3 toxicities included radiation dermatitis (n = 1) and immunotherapy-related rash (n = 1). No G4+ toxicities were reported.

Conclusion: Single modality PBT for HN melanomas in the definitive setting provides effective and durable local control rates with tolerable acute toxicity. Distant failure remains the primary pattern of failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信