光学相干断层扫描和非专业的角镜检查检测角闭合的诊断性能。

Q3 Medicine
Bruno Lb Esporcatte, Roberto M Vessani, Luiz As Melo, Norton S Yanagimori, Guilherme H Bufarah, Norma Allemann, Ivan M Tavares
{"title":"光学相干断层扫描和非专业的角镜检查检测角闭合的诊断性能。","authors":"Bruno Lb Esporcatte,&nbsp;Roberto M Vessani,&nbsp;Luiz As Melo,&nbsp;Norton S Yanagimori,&nbsp;Guilherme H Bufarah,&nbsp;Norma Allemann,&nbsp;Ivan M Tavares","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the usefulness of gonioscopy performed by general ophthalmologists (GO) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detecting angle closure in patients with a shallow anterior chamber.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four patients with a shallow anterior chamber (defined by a ratio of peripheral anterior chamber depth to peripheral corneal thickness lower than 1/2) were included in this cross-sectional study. Gonioscopy was performed in all subjects by two glaucoma experts (GE1 and GE2) and one GO. Anterior segment imaging was performed using Visante® OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc.). Agreement between examiners was assessed with first-order agreement coefficients (AC1). Diagnostic accuracies of GO gonioscopy and AS-OCT were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For static gonioscopy, the agreement between GE1 and GE2 was substantial (AC1 = 0.65), and that between GE1 and GO was moderate (AC1 = 0.50). For indentation gonioscopy, the agreement between GE1 and GE2 was slightly lower (AC1 = 0.55); however, the agreement between GE1 and GO showed a larger reduction (AC1 = 0.12). GO's gonioscopy presented a low specificity (25%) and the AROC to angle closure detection was lower than AS-OCT (0.56-0.73). Combined information of GO gonioscopy and AS-OCT improved specificity (85.7%) and AROC (0.77) of angle closure evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Agreement between GO and glaucoma experts was moderate for static gonioscopy and slight for indentation gonioscopy. AS-OCT performed better than GO gonioscopy in detecting angle closure in patients with a shallow anterior chamber. The addition of AS-OCT to clinical information in patients with GO positive gonioscopy improved the specificity and AROC of gonioscopy test.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Esporcatte BLB, Vessani RM, Melo Jr LAS, <i>et al.</i> Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography and Nonspecialist Gonioscopy to Detect Angle Closure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(1):53-58.</p>","PeriodicalId":15419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/ff/jocgp-16-53.PMC9385383.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography and Nonspecialist Gonioscopy to Detect Angle Closure.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Lb Esporcatte,&nbsp;Roberto M Vessani,&nbsp;Luiz As Melo,&nbsp;Norton S Yanagimori,&nbsp;Guilherme H Bufarah,&nbsp;Norma Allemann,&nbsp;Ivan M Tavares\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the usefulness of gonioscopy performed by general ophthalmologists (GO) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detecting angle closure in patients with a shallow anterior chamber.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four patients with a shallow anterior chamber (defined by a ratio of peripheral anterior chamber depth to peripheral corneal thickness lower than 1/2) were included in this cross-sectional study. Gonioscopy was performed in all subjects by two glaucoma experts (GE1 and GE2) and one GO. Anterior segment imaging was performed using Visante® OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc.). Agreement between examiners was assessed with first-order agreement coefficients (AC1). Diagnostic accuracies of GO gonioscopy and AS-OCT were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For static gonioscopy, the agreement between GE1 and GE2 was substantial (AC1 = 0.65), and that between GE1 and GO was moderate (AC1 = 0.50). For indentation gonioscopy, the agreement between GE1 and GE2 was slightly lower (AC1 = 0.55); however, the agreement between GE1 and GO showed a larger reduction (AC1 = 0.12). GO's gonioscopy presented a low specificity (25%) and the AROC to angle closure detection was lower than AS-OCT (0.56-0.73). Combined information of GO gonioscopy and AS-OCT improved specificity (85.7%) and AROC (0.77) of angle closure evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Agreement between GO and glaucoma experts was moderate for static gonioscopy and slight for indentation gonioscopy. AS-OCT performed better than GO gonioscopy in detecting angle closure in patients with a shallow anterior chamber. The addition of AS-OCT to clinical information in patients with GO positive gonioscopy improved the specificity and AROC of gonioscopy test.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Esporcatte BLB, Vessani RM, Melo Jr LAS, <i>et al.</i> Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography and Nonspecialist Gonioscopy to Detect Angle Closure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(1):53-58.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/ff/jocgp-16-53.PMC9385383.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较普通眼科医生(GO)和前段光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)在检测浅前房患者角闭的有效性。方法:本横断面研究纳入44例浅前房患者(定义为外周前房深度与角膜外周厚度之比小于1/2)。所有受试者均由两名青光眼专家(GE1和GE2)和一名GO进行角膜镜检查。使用Visante®OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc.)进行前段成像。审查员之间的一致性用一阶一致性系数(AC1)来评估。使用敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积评估GO阴道镜和AS-OCT的诊断准确性。结果:静态角镜检查,GE1与GE2吻合较好(AC1 = 0.65), GE1与GO吻合较好(AC1 = 0.50)。对于凹痕角镜,GE1和GE2的一致性略低(AC1 = 0.55);然而,GE1和GO之间的一致性显示更大的降低(AC1 = 0.12)。GO的角镜检查特异性较低(25%),对角闭合检测的AROC低于AS-OCT(0.56-0.73)。GO角镜与AS-OCT信息的结合提高了闭角评价的特异性(85.7%)和AROC(0.77)。结论:GO与青光眼专家在静态角镜检查中意见一致,在压痕角镜检查中意见不一致。AS-OCT在检测浅前房患者的角闭合方面优于GO角镜。在GO阳性患者的临床信息中加入AS-OCT,提高了gonioscopy检查的特异性和AROC。如何引用本文:Esporcatte BLB, Vessani RM, Melo Jr LAS等。光学相干断层扫描和非专业的角镜检查检测角闭合的诊断性能。中华青光眼杂志;2010;16(1):53-58。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography and Nonspecialist Gonioscopy to Detect Angle Closure.

Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography and Nonspecialist Gonioscopy to Detect Angle Closure.

Aim: To compare the usefulness of gonioscopy performed by general ophthalmologists (GO) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detecting angle closure in patients with a shallow anterior chamber.

Methods: Forty-four patients with a shallow anterior chamber (defined by a ratio of peripheral anterior chamber depth to peripheral corneal thickness lower than 1/2) were included in this cross-sectional study. Gonioscopy was performed in all subjects by two glaucoma experts (GE1 and GE2) and one GO. Anterior segment imaging was performed using Visante® OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc.). Agreement between examiners was assessed with first-order agreement coefficients (AC1). Diagnostic accuracies of GO gonioscopy and AS-OCT were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves.

Results: For static gonioscopy, the agreement between GE1 and GE2 was substantial (AC1 = 0.65), and that between GE1 and GO was moderate (AC1 = 0.50). For indentation gonioscopy, the agreement between GE1 and GE2 was slightly lower (AC1 = 0.55); however, the agreement between GE1 and GO showed a larger reduction (AC1 = 0.12). GO's gonioscopy presented a low specificity (25%) and the AROC to angle closure detection was lower than AS-OCT (0.56-0.73). Combined information of GO gonioscopy and AS-OCT improved specificity (85.7%) and AROC (0.77) of angle closure evaluation.

Conclusion: Agreement between GO and glaucoma experts was moderate for static gonioscopy and slight for indentation gonioscopy. AS-OCT performed better than GO gonioscopy in detecting angle closure in patients with a shallow anterior chamber. The addition of AS-OCT to clinical information in patients with GO positive gonioscopy improved the specificity and AROC of gonioscopy test.

How to cite this article: Esporcatte BLB, Vessani RM, Melo Jr LAS, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography and Nonspecialist Gonioscopy to Detect Angle Closure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(1):53-58.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信