IONM的误解第二部分:是否会发生阳极阻滞以及术中体感诱发电位是否需要双极刺激?

Q3 Health Professions
David W Allison, Randy S D'Amico, Justin W Silverstein
{"title":"IONM的误解第二部分:是否会发生阳极阻滞以及术中体感诱发电位是否需要双极刺激?","authors":"David W Allison,&nbsp;Randy S D'Amico,&nbsp;Justin W Silverstein","doi":"10.1080/21646821.2022.2107862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) guidelines recommend bipolar stimulation with the anode at or near the crease of the wrist and the cathode 2-4 cm proximal to the anode for median nerve SSEPs. The rationale for this cathode proximal bipolar configuration appears to be the avoidance of anodal blocking; however, there is a paucity of experimental support for the existence of anodal blocking. Evidence that bipolar stimulation preferentially drives stimulation from the cathode better than monopolar cathodal or monopolar anodal in peripheral nerves in human neurophysiology is also lacking. This study compared anode proximal to anode distal bipolar stimulation of median nerve SSEPs and the efficacy of monopolar cathode to monopolar anode stimulation in generating median, ulnar, and tibial nerve SSEPs. No difference in median nerve cortical SSEP amplitude was observed between anode proximal and anode distal bipolar stimulation at supramaximal stimulation suggesting cathode proximal bipolar is equal to anode proximal bipolar stimulation at supramaximal intensity. This data suggests that anodal blocking does not occur in intraoperative SSEPs. Furthermore, no differences were observed in ulnar, median, and tibial nerve SSEP cortical or subcortical amplitudes and latencies between monopolar cathodal or monopolar anodal stimulation suggesting monopolar cathode and anode stimulation are equally effective at evincing intraoperative SSEPs at supramaximal intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22816,"journal":{"name":"The Neurodiagnostic Journal","volume":"62 3","pages":"164-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misconceptions in IONM Part II: Does Anodal Blocking Occur and Is Bipolar Stimulation Necessary with Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potentials?\",\"authors\":\"David W Allison,&nbsp;Randy S D'Amico,&nbsp;Justin W Silverstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21646821.2022.2107862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) guidelines recommend bipolar stimulation with the anode at or near the crease of the wrist and the cathode 2-4 cm proximal to the anode for median nerve SSEPs. The rationale for this cathode proximal bipolar configuration appears to be the avoidance of anodal blocking; however, there is a paucity of experimental support for the existence of anodal blocking. Evidence that bipolar stimulation preferentially drives stimulation from the cathode better than monopolar cathodal or monopolar anodal in peripheral nerves in human neurophysiology is also lacking. This study compared anode proximal to anode distal bipolar stimulation of median nerve SSEPs and the efficacy of monopolar cathode to monopolar anode stimulation in generating median, ulnar, and tibial nerve SSEPs. No difference in median nerve cortical SSEP amplitude was observed between anode proximal and anode distal bipolar stimulation at supramaximal stimulation suggesting cathode proximal bipolar is equal to anode proximal bipolar stimulation at supramaximal intensity. This data suggests that anodal blocking does not occur in intraoperative SSEPs. Furthermore, no differences were observed in ulnar, median, and tibial nerve SSEP cortical or subcortical amplitudes and latencies between monopolar cathodal or monopolar anodal stimulation suggesting monopolar cathode and anode stimulation are equally effective at evincing intraoperative SSEPs at supramaximal intensity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Neurodiagnostic Journal\",\"volume\":\"62 3\",\"pages\":\"164-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Neurodiagnostic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2022.2107862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neurodiagnostic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2022.2107862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目前的术中体感诱发电位(SSEP)指南推荐在正中神经SSEP中采用双极刺激,阳极在手腕皱襞或附近,阴极在阳极近端2-4厘米处。这种阴极近端双极配置的基本原理似乎是避免阳极阻塞;然而,缺乏实验支持阳极阻塞的存在。在人类神经生理学中,双极刺激优先驱动来自阴极的刺激比单极阴极或单极阳极的刺激更好的证据也缺乏。本研究比较了正极近端和负极远端双极刺激对正中神经ssep的影响,以及单极阴极和单极阳极刺激对正中神经、尺神经和胫骨神经ssep的影响。正极近端刺激与负极远端刺激在上极刺激下正中神经皮层SSEP振幅无差异,提示正极近端刺激与负极近端刺激在上极刺激下的强度相等。这一数据表明,术中ssep不会发生阳极阻塞。此外,在单极阴极或单极阳极刺激中,尺神经、正中神经和胫骨神经SSEP皮质或皮质下的振幅和潜伏期均未观察到差异,这表明单极阴极和阳极刺激在证实术中SSEP达到最大强度时同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misconceptions in IONM Part II: Does Anodal Blocking Occur and Is Bipolar Stimulation Necessary with Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potentials?

Current intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) guidelines recommend bipolar stimulation with the anode at or near the crease of the wrist and the cathode 2-4 cm proximal to the anode for median nerve SSEPs. The rationale for this cathode proximal bipolar configuration appears to be the avoidance of anodal blocking; however, there is a paucity of experimental support for the existence of anodal blocking. Evidence that bipolar stimulation preferentially drives stimulation from the cathode better than monopolar cathodal or monopolar anodal in peripheral nerves in human neurophysiology is also lacking. This study compared anode proximal to anode distal bipolar stimulation of median nerve SSEPs and the efficacy of monopolar cathode to monopolar anode stimulation in generating median, ulnar, and tibial nerve SSEPs. No difference in median nerve cortical SSEP amplitude was observed between anode proximal and anode distal bipolar stimulation at supramaximal stimulation suggesting cathode proximal bipolar is equal to anode proximal bipolar stimulation at supramaximal intensity. This data suggests that anodal blocking does not occur in intraoperative SSEPs. Furthermore, no differences were observed in ulnar, median, and tibial nerve SSEP cortical or subcortical amplitudes and latencies between monopolar cathodal or monopolar anodal stimulation suggesting monopolar cathode and anode stimulation are equally effective at evincing intraoperative SSEPs at supramaximal intensity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Neurodiagnostic Journal
The Neurodiagnostic Journal Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Neurodiagnostic Journal is the official journal of ASET - The Neurodiagnostic Society. It serves as an educational resource for Neurodiagnostic professionals, a vehicle for introducing new techniques and innovative technologies in the field, patient safety and advocacy, and an avenue for sharing best practices within the Neurodiagnostic Technology profession. The journal features original articles about electroencephalography (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), nerve conduction (NC), polysomnography (PSG), autonomic testing, and long-term monitoring (LTM) in the intensive care (ICU) and epilepsy monitoring units (EMU). Subject matter also includes education, training, lab management, legislative and licensure needs, guidelines for standards of care, and the impact of our profession in healthcare and society. The journal seeks to foster ideas, commentary, and news from technologists, physicians, clinicians, managers/leaders, and professional organizations, and to introduce trends and the latest developments in the field of neurodiagnostics. Media reviews, case studies, ASET Annual Conference proceedings, review articles, and quizzes for ASET-CEUs are also published in The Neurodiagnostic Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信