机器人辅助肾移植:准备好进入黄金时代了吗?

Vincenzo Li Marzi, Alessio Pecoraro, Maria Lucia Gallo, Leonardo Caroti, Adriano Peris, Graziano Vignolini, Sergio Serni, Riccardo Campi
{"title":"机器人辅助肾移植:准备好进入黄金时代了吗?","authors":"Vincenzo Li Marzi,&nbsp;Alessio Pecoraro,&nbsp;Maria Lucia Gallo,&nbsp;Leonardo Caroti,&nbsp;Adriano Peris,&nbsp;Graziano Vignolini,&nbsp;Sergio Serni,&nbsp;Riccardo Campi","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v12.i7.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, providing a better survival rate and quality of life compared to dialysis. Despite the progress in the medical management of KT patients, from a purely surgical standpoint, KT has resisted innovations during the last 50 years. Recently, robot-assisted KT (RAKT) has been proposed as an alternative approach to open surgery, especially due to its potential benefits for fragile and immunocompromised recipients. It was not until 2014 that the role of RAKT has found value thanks to the pioneering Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta collaboration that conceptualized and developed a new surgical technique for RAKT following the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up recommendations for introducing surgical innovations into real-life practice. During the last years, mirroring the Vattikuti-Medanta technique, several centers developed RAKT program worldwide, providing strong evidence about the safety and the feasibility of this procedure. However, the majority of RAKT are still performed in the living donor setting, as an \"eligible\" procedure, while only a few centers have realized KT through a robotic approach in the challenging scenario of cadaver donation. In addition, despite the spread of minimally-invasive (predominantly robotic) surgery worldwide, many KTs are still performed in an open fashion. Regardless of the type of incision employed by surgeons, open KT may lead to non-negligible risks of wound complications, especially among obese patients. Particularly, the assessment for KT should consider not only the added surgical technical challenges but also the higher risk of postoperative complications. In this context, robotic surgery could offer several benefits, including providing a better exposure of the surgical field and better instrument maneuverability, as well as the possibility to integrate other technological nuances, such as the use of intraoperative fluorescence vascular imaging with indocyanine green to assess the ureteral vascularization before the uretero-vesical anastomosis. Therefore, our review aims to report the more significant experiences regarding RAKT, focusing on the results and future perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":68893,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","volume":"12 7","pages":"163-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/72/WJT-12-163.PMC9331411.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: Is it getting ready for prime time?\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Li Marzi,&nbsp;Alessio Pecoraro,&nbsp;Maria Lucia Gallo,&nbsp;Leonardo Caroti,&nbsp;Adriano Peris,&nbsp;Graziano Vignolini,&nbsp;Sergio Serni,&nbsp;Riccardo Campi\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v12.i7.163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, providing a better survival rate and quality of life compared to dialysis. Despite the progress in the medical management of KT patients, from a purely surgical standpoint, KT has resisted innovations during the last 50 years. Recently, robot-assisted KT (RAKT) has been proposed as an alternative approach to open surgery, especially due to its potential benefits for fragile and immunocompromised recipients. It was not until 2014 that the role of RAKT has found value thanks to the pioneering Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta collaboration that conceptualized and developed a new surgical technique for RAKT following the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up recommendations for introducing surgical innovations into real-life practice. During the last years, mirroring the Vattikuti-Medanta technique, several centers developed RAKT program worldwide, providing strong evidence about the safety and the feasibility of this procedure. However, the majority of RAKT are still performed in the living donor setting, as an \\\"eligible\\\" procedure, while only a few centers have realized KT through a robotic approach in the challenging scenario of cadaver donation. In addition, despite the spread of minimally-invasive (predominantly robotic) surgery worldwide, many KTs are still performed in an open fashion. Regardless of the type of incision employed by surgeons, open KT may lead to non-negligible risks of wound complications, especially among obese patients. Particularly, the assessment for KT should consider not only the added surgical technical challenges but also the higher risk of postoperative complications. In this context, robotic surgery could offer several benefits, including providing a better exposure of the surgical field and better instrument maneuverability, as well as the possibility to integrate other technological nuances, such as the use of intraoperative fluorescence vascular imaging with indocyanine green to assess the ureteral vascularization before the uretero-vesical anastomosis. Therefore, our review aims to report the more significant experiences regarding RAKT, focusing on the results and future perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":68893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界移植杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"12 7\",\"pages\":\"163-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/72/WJT-12-163.PMC9331411.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界移植杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v12.i7.163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v12.i7.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

肾移植(KT)是终末期肾病患者的治疗选择,与透析相比,它提供了更好的生存率和生活质量。尽管在KT患者的医疗管理方面取得了进展,但从纯粹的外科角度来看,KT在过去的50年里一直抵制创新。最近,机器人辅助KT (RAKT)被提议作为开放手术的替代方法,特别是由于其对脆弱和免疫功能低下的受者的潜在益处。直到2014年,RAKT的作用发现了价值,这要归功于开创性的Vattikuti泌尿外科研究所- medanta合作,根据将外科创新引入现实实践的想法,开发,探索,评估,长期随访建议,为RAKT概念化并开发了一种新的外科技术。在过去的几年里,效仿Vattikuti-Medanta技术,世界各地的几个中心开发了RAKT项目,提供了关于该程序安全性和可行性的有力证据。然而,大多数RAKT仍然是在活体供体环境中进行的,作为一种“合格”的程序,而只有少数中心通过机器人方法在具有挑战性的尸体捐赠场景中实现了KT。此外,尽管微创(主要是机器人)手术在世界范围内的传播,许多kt仍然以开放的方式进行。无论外科医生采用何种切口,开放式KT都可能导致不可忽视的伤口并发症风险,尤其是在肥胖患者中。特别是,对KT的评估不仅要考虑到增加的手术技术挑战,还要考虑到术后并发症的高风险。在这种情况下,机器人手术可以提供一些好处,包括提供更好的手术视野和更好的器械可操作性,以及整合其他技术细微差别的可能性,例如在输尿管-膀胱吻合前使用吲哚菁绿荧光血管成像来评估输尿管血管化。因此,我们的综述旨在报告有关RAKT的更重要的经验,重点关注结果和未来的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: Is it getting ready for prime time?

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: Is it getting ready for prime time?

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: Is it getting ready for prime time?

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, providing a better survival rate and quality of life compared to dialysis. Despite the progress in the medical management of KT patients, from a purely surgical standpoint, KT has resisted innovations during the last 50 years. Recently, robot-assisted KT (RAKT) has been proposed as an alternative approach to open surgery, especially due to its potential benefits for fragile and immunocompromised recipients. It was not until 2014 that the role of RAKT has found value thanks to the pioneering Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta collaboration that conceptualized and developed a new surgical technique for RAKT following the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up recommendations for introducing surgical innovations into real-life practice. During the last years, mirroring the Vattikuti-Medanta technique, several centers developed RAKT program worldwide, providing strong evidence about the safety and the feasibility of this procedure. However, the majority of RAKT are still performed in the living donor setting, as an "eligible" procedure, while only a few centers have realized KT through a robotic approach in the challenging scenario of cadaver donation. In addition, despite the spread of minimally-invasive (predominantly robotic) surgery worldwide, many KTs are still performed in an open fashion. Regardless of the type of incision employed by surgeons, open KT may lead to non-negligible risks of wound complications, especially among obese patients. Particularly, the assessment for KT should consider not only the added surgical technical challenges but also the higher risk of postoperative complications. In this context, robotic surgery could offer several benefits, including providing a better exposure of the surgical field and better instrument maneuverability, as well as the possibility to integrate other technological nuances, such as the use of intraoperative fluorescence vascular imaging with indocyanine green to assess the ureteral vascularization before the uretero-vesical anastomosis. Therefore, our review aims to report the more significant experiences regarding RAKT, focusing on the results and future perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
364
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信