单剂量和双剂量伊维菌素早期治疗对预防轻度COVID-19进展至住院的疗效:一项多组、平行组、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-23 DOI:10.1111/resp.14318
Alireza Mirahmadizadeh, Ali Semati, Alireza Heiran, Mostafa Ebrahimi, Abdolrasool Hemmati, Mohammadreza Karimi, Souzan Basir, Marjan Zare, Antonio Charlys da Costa, Mohammad Zeinali, Maryam Sargolzaee, Owrang Eilami
{"title":"单剂量和双剂量伊维菌素早期治疗对预防轻度COVID-19进展至住院的疗效:一项多组、平行组、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验","authors":"Alireza Mirahmadizadeh,&nbsp;Ali Semati,&nbsp;Alireza Heiran,&nbsp;Mostafa Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Abdolrasool Hemmati,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Karimi,&nbsp;Souzan Basir,&nbsp;Marjan Zare,&nbsp;Antonio Charlys da Costa,&nbsp;Mohammad Zeinali,&nbsp;Maryam Sargolzaee,&nbsp;Owrang Eilami","doi":"10.1111/resp.14318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Ivermectin is a known anti-parasitic agent that has been investigated as an antiviral agent against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin in mild COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-arm randomized clinical trial conducted between 9 April 2021 and 20 May 2021, a total of 393 patients with reverse transcription-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection and mild symptoms were enrolled. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive single-dose ivermectin (12 mg), double-dose ivermectin (24 mg) or placebo. The primary outcome was need for hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the proportion of subjects who required hospitalization between the placebo and single-dose ivermectin groups (absolute difference in the proportions: -2.3 [95% CI = -8.5, 4.1]) and between the placebo and double-dose ivermectin groups (absolute difference in the proportions: -3.9 [95% CI = -9.8, 2.2]). The odds of differences in mean change in severity score between single-dose ivermectin and placebo groups (OR<sub>difference</sub>  = 1.005 [95% CI: 0.972, 1.040]; p = 0.762) and double-dose ivermectin and placebo groups (OR<sub>difference</sub>  = 1.010 [95% CI: 0.974, 1.046]; p = 0.598) were not statistically significant. None of the six adverse events (including mild dermatitis, tachycardia and hypertension) were serious and required extra action.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-dose and double-dose ivermectin early treatment were not superior to the placebo in preventing progression to hospitalization and improving clinical course in mild COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":162871,"journal":{"name":"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)","volume":" ","pages":"758-766"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350312/pdf/RESP-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of single-dose and double-dose ivermectin early treatment in preventing progression to hospitalization in mild COVID-19: A multi-arm, parallel-group randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Mirahmadizadeh,&nbsp;Ali Semati,&nbsp;Alireza Heiran,&nbsp;Mostafa Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Abdolrasool Hemmati,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Karimi,&nbsp;Souzan Basir,&nbsp;Marjan Zare,&nbsp;Antonio Charlys da Costa,&nbsp;Mohammad Zeinali,&nbsp;Maryam Sargolzaee,&nbsp;Owrang Eilami\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/resp.14318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Ivermectin is a known anti-parasitic agent that has been investigated as an antiviral agent against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin in mild COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-arm randomized clinical trial conducted between 9 April 2021 and 20 May 2021, a total of 393 patients with reverse transcription-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection and mild symptoms were enrolled. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive single-dose ivermectin (12 mg), double-dose ivermectin (24 mg) or placebo. The primary outcome was need for hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the proportion of subjects who required hospitalization between the placebo and single-dose ivermectin groups (absolute difference in the proportions: -2.3 [95% CI = -8.5, 4.1]) and between the placebo and double-dose ivermectin groups (absolute difference in the proportions: -3.9 [95% CI = -9.8, 2.2]). The odds of differences in mean change in severity score between single-dose ivermectin and placebo groups (OR<sub>difference</sub>  = 1.005 [95% CI: 0.972, 1.040]; p = 0.762) and double-dose ivermectin and placebo groups (OR<sub>difference</sub>  = 1.010 [95% CI: 0.974, 1.046]; p = 0.598) were not statistically significant. None of the six adverse events (including mild dermatitis, tachycardia and hypertension) were serious and required extra action.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-dose and double-dose ivermectin early treatment were not superior to the placebo in preventing progression to hospitalization and improving clinical course in mild COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":162871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"758-766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350312/pdf/RESP-9999-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景与目的:伊维菌素是一种已知的抗寄生虫药物,已被研究作为冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)的抗病毒药物。本研究旨在评价伊维菌素治疗轻症COVID-19患者的疗效。方法:在2021年4月9日至2021年5月20日进行的这项多组随机临床试验中,共招募了393例逆转录pcr确诊的COVID-19感染且症状轻微的患者。受试者按1:1:1的比例随机接受单剂量伊维菌素(12mg)、双剂量伊维菌素(24mg)或安慰剂。主要结局是住院治疗的需要。结果:安慰剂组和单剂量伊维菌素组之间需要住院治疗的受试者比例(绝对差异:-2.3 [95% CI = -8.5, 4.1])和安慰剂组和双剂量伊维菌素组之间(绝对差异:-3.9 [95% CI = -9.8, 2.2])无显著差异。单剂量伊维菌素组与安慰剂组严重程度评分平均变化的比值差异(ORdifference = 1.005 [95% CI: 0.972, 1.040];p = 0.762),双剂量伊维菌素和安慰剂组(or差异= 1.010 [95% CI: 0.974, 1.046];P = 0.598),差异无统计学意义。6个不良事件(包括轻度皮炎、心动过速和高血压)均不严重,不需要采取额外措施。结论:单剂量和双剂量伊维菌素早期治疗在预防轻症患者住院进展和改善临床病程方面均不优于安慰剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of single-dose and double-dose ivermectin early treatment in preventing progression to hospitalization in mild COVID-19: A multi-arm, parallel-group randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Background and objective: Ivermectin is a known anti-parasitic agent that has been investigated as an antiviral agent against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin in mild COVID-19 patients.

Methods: In this multi-arm randomized clinical trial conducted between 9 April 2021 and 20 May 2021, a total of 393 patients with reverse transcription-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection and mild symptoms were enrolled. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive single-dose ivermectin (12 mg), double-dose ivermectin (24 mg) or placebo. The primary outcome was need for hospitalization.

Results: There was no significant difference in the proportion of subjects who required hospitalization between the placebo and single-dose ivermectin groups (absolute difference in the proportions: -2.3 [95% CI = -8.5, 4.1]) and between the placebo and double-dose ivermectin groups (absolute difference in the proportions: -3.9 [95% CI = -9.8, 2.2]). The odds of differences in mean change in severity score between single-dose ivermectin and placebo groups (ORdifference  = 1.005 [95% CI: 0.972, 1.040]; p = 0.762) and double-dose ivermectin and placebo groups (ORdifference  = 1.010 [95% CI: 0.974, 1.046]; p = 0.598) were not statistically significant. None of the six adverse events (including mild dermatitis, tachycardia and hypertension) were serious and required extra action.

Conclusion: Single-dose and double-dose ivermectin early treatment were not superior to the placebo in preventing progression to hospitalization and improving clinical course in mild COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信