Oleg N Vassiliev, Christine B Peterson, Joe Y Chang, Radhe Mohan
{"title":"利用FFF束提高肺部SBRT的治疗率。","authors":"Oleg N Vassiliev, Christine B Peterson, Joe Y Chang, Radhe Mohan","doi":"10.1017/s1460396920000576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the extent to which lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans can be improved by replacing conventional flattening filter (FF) beams with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We selected 15 patients who had received SBRT with conventional 6-MV photon beams for early-stage lung cancer. We imported the patients' treatment plans into the Eclipse 13.6 treatment planning system, in which we configured the AAA dose calculation model using representative beam data for a TrueBeam accelerator operated in 6-MV FFF mode. We then created new treatment plans by replacing the conventional FF beams in the original plans with FFF beams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FFF plans had better target coverage than the original FF plans did. For the planning target volume, FFF plans significantly improved the D<sub>98</sub>, D<sub>95</sub>, D<sub>90</sub>, homogeneity index, and uncomplicated tumor control probability. In most cases, the doses to organs at risk were lower in FFF plans. FFF plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose, V<sub>10</sub>, V<sub>20</sub>, V<sub>30</sub>, and normal tissue complication probability for the total lung and improved the dosimetric indices for the ipsilateral lung. For most patients, FFF beams achieved lower maximum doses to the esophagus, heart, and the spinal cord; and a lower chest wall V<sub>30</sub>.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with FF beams, FFF beams achieved lower doses to organs at risk, especially the lung, without compromising tumor coverage; in fact, FFF beams improved coverage in most cases. Thus, replacing FF beams with FFF beams can achieve a better therapeutic ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":44597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","volume":"20 4","pages":"419-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s1460396920000576","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using FFF Beams to Improve the Therapeutic Ratio of Lung SBRT.\",\"authors\":\"Oleg N Vassiliev, Christine B Peterson, Joe Y Chang, Radhe Mohan\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1460396920000576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the extent to which lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans can be improved by replacing conventional flattening filter (FF) beams with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We selected 15 patients who had received SBRT with conventional 6-MV photon beams for early-stage lung cancer. We imported the patients' treatment plans into the Eclipse 13.6 treatment planning system, in which we configured the AAA dose calculation model using representative beam data for a TrueBeam accelerator operated in 6-MV FFF mode. We then created new treatment plans by replacing the conventional FF beams in the original plans with FFF beams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FFF plans had better target coverage than the original FF plans did. For the planning target volume, FFF plans significantly improved the D<sub>98</sub>, D<sub>95</sub>, D<sub>90</sub>, homogeneity index, and uncomplicated tumor control probability. In most cases, the doses to organs at risk were lower in FFF plans. FFF plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose, V<sub>10</sub>, V<sub>20</sub>, V<sub>30</sub>, and normal tissue complication probability for the total lung and improved the dosimetric indices for the ipsilateral lung. For most patients, FFF beams achieved lower maximum doses to the esophagus, heart, and the spinal cord; and a lower chest wall V<sub>30</sub>.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with FF beams, FFF beams achieved lower doses to organs at risk, especially the lung, without compromising tumor coverage; in fact, FFF beams improved coverage in most cases. Thus, replacing FF beams with FFF beams can achieve a better therapeutic ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"419-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s1460396920000576\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1460396920000576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1460396920000576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using FFF Beams to Improve the Therapeutic Ratio of Lung SBRT.
Aim: To investigate the extent to which lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans can be improved by replacing conventional flattening filter (FF) beams with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams.
Material and methods: We selected 15 patients who had received SBRT with conventional 6-MV photon beams for early-stage lung cancer. We imported the patients' treatment plans into the Eclipse 13.6 treatment planning system, in which we configured the AAA dose calculation model using representative beam data for a TrueBeam accelerator operated in 6-MV FFF mode. We then created new treatment plans by replacing the conventional FF beams in the original plans with FFF beams.
Results: The FFF plans had better target coverage than the original FF plans did. For the planning target volume, FFF plans significantly improved the D98, D95, D90, homogeneity index, and uncomplicated tumor control probability. In most cases, the doses to organs at risk were lower in FFF plans. FFF plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose, V10, V20, V30, and normal tissue complication probability for the total lung and improved the dosimetric indices for the ipsilateral lung. For most patients, FFF beams achieved lower maximum doses to the esophagus, heart, and the spinal cord; and a lower chest wall V30.
Findings: Compared with FF beams, FFF beams achieved lower doses to organs at risk, especially the lung, without compromising tumor coverage; in fact, FFF beams improved coverage in most cases. Thus, replacing FF beams with FFF beams can achieve a better therapeutic ratio.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice is a peer-reviewed journal covering all of the current modalities specific to clinical oncology and radiotherapy. The journal aims to publish research from a wide range of styles and encourage debate and the exchange of information and opinion from within the field of radiotherapy practice and clinical oncology. The journal also aims to encourage technical evaluations and case studies as well as equipment reviews that will be of interest to an international radiotherapy audience.