{"title":"临床高危精神病患者的抗精神病药物暴露:来自大型队列研究的经验见解。","authors":"JiaHui Zeng, Andrea Raballo, RanPiao Gan, GuiSen Wu, YanYan Wei, LiHua Xu, XiaoChen Tang, YeGang Hu, YingYing Tang, Tao Chen, ChunBo Li, JiJun Wang, TianHong Zhang","doi":"10.4088/JCP.21m14092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Current treatment guidelines for individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis do not recommend the prescription of antipsychotics (not even second-generation ones) as the first treatment option for preventing psychosis. Yet, recent meta-analytic evidence indicates that antipsychotic exposure in CHR is relatively widespread and associated with a higher imminent risk of transition to psychosis. Therefore, we undertook this study to better delineate which clinical characteristics of CHR individuals may lead to the choice of antipsychotic prescription and whether it identifies a subgroup at higher risk for conversion to psychosis.</p><p><p><b><i>Methods:</i></b> Consecutively referred CHR individuals (N = 717) were assessed for demographic and clinical characteristics and followed up for 3 years (200 did not reach the end of the follow-up time) from 2016 to 2021. The sample was then dichotomized, on the basis of antipsychotic prescription, to prescribed (CHRAP+, n = 492) or not-prescribed (CHRAP-, n = 225) groups, which were subsequently compared for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The risks of conversion to psychosis in CHRAP+ versus CHRAP- groups were tested via survival analysis.</p><p><p><b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 717 CHR individuals, 492 (68.62%) were prescribed antipsychotics; among these antipsychotics, the highest proportion used was for aripiprazole (n = 152), followed by olanzapine (n = 106), amisulpride (n = 76), and risperidone (n = 64). The CHRAP+ group had younger age (<i>t</i> = 2.138, <i>P</i> = .033), higher proportion of female individuals (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 5.084, <i>P</i> = .024), psychotic symptoms of greater severity (<i>t</i> = 7.910, <i>P</i> < .001), and more impaired general function (<i>t</i> = 5.846, <i>P</i> < .001) than the CHRAP- group. The CHRAP+ group had greater risk for conversion to psychosis (27.0% in the CHRAP+ group vs 10.9% in the CHRAP- group, <i>P</i> < .001). Factors related to positive symptoms were the most likely to influence doctors' decision-making regarding prescripton of antipsychotics, without influence of age, sex, and education levels.</p><p><p><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Clinicians may prescribe antipsychotics mainly based on the severity of positive and disorganization symptoms of CHR individuals. The CHRAP+ group was associated with a higher risk of conversion to psychosis. In pragmatic terms, this finding indicates that baseline antipsychotic prescription in CHR cohorts is a warning flag for higher incipient risk of psychosis and designates as hyper-CHR subgroup as compared to antipsychotic-naive CHR.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04010864.</p>","PeriodicalId":516853,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antipsychotic Exposure in Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: Empirical Insights From a Large Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"JiaHui Zeng, Andrea Raballo, RanPiao Gan, GuiSen Wu, YanYan Wei, LiHua Xu, XiaoChen Tang, YeGang Hu, YingYing Tang, Tao Chen, ChunBo Li, JiJun Wang, TianHong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.21m14092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Current treatment guidelines for individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis do not recommend the prescription of antipsychotics (not even second-generation ones) as the first treatment option for preventing psychosis. Yet, recent meta-analytic evidence indicates that antipsychotic exposure in CHR is relatively widespread and associated with a higher imminent risk of transition to psychosis. Therefore, we undertook this study to better delineate which clinical characteristics of CHR individuals may lead to the choice of antipsychotic prescription and whether it identifies a subgroup at higher risk for conversion to psychosis.</p><p><p><b><i>Methods:</i></b> Consecutively referred CHR individuals (N = 717) were assessed for demographic and clinical characteristics and followed up for 3 years (200 did not reach the end of the follow-up time) from 2016 to 2021. The sample was then dichotomized, on the basis of antipsychotic prescription, to prescribed (CHRAP+, n = 492) or not-prescribed (CHRAP-, n = 225) groups, which were subsequently compared for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The risks of conversion to psychosis in CHRAP+ versus CHRAP- groups were tested via survival analysis.</p><p><p><b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 717 CHR individuals, 492 (68.62%) were prescribed antipsychotics; among these antipsychotics, the highest proportion used was for aripiprazole (n = 152), followed by olanzapine (n = 106), amisulpride (n = 76), and risperidone (n = 64). The CHRAP+ group had younger age (<i>t</i> = 2.138, <i>P</i> = .033), higher proportion of female individuals (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 5.084, <i>P</i> = .024), psychotic symptoms of greater severity (<i>t</i> = 7.910, <i>P</i> < .001), and more impaired general function (<i>t</i> = 5.846, <i>P</i> < .001) than the CHRAP- group. The CHRAP+ group had greater risk for conversion to psychosis (27.0% in the CHRAP+ group vs 10.9% in the CHRAP- group, <i>P</i> < .001). Factors related to positive symptoms were the most likely to influence doctors' decision-making regarding prescripton of antipsychotics, without influence of age, sex, and education levels.</p><p><p><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Clinicians may prescribe antipsychotics mainly based on the severity of positive and disorganization symptoms of CHR individuals. The CHRAP+ group was associated with a higher risk of conversion to psychosis. In pragmatic terms, this finding indicates that baseline antipsychotic prescription in CHR cohorts is a warning flag for higher incipient risk of psychosis and designates as hyper-CHR subgroup as compared to antipsychotic-naive CHR.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04010864.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.21m14092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.21m14092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:目前精神病临床高危人群(CHR)的治疗指南不建议将抗精神病药物(甚至不是第二代抗精神病药物)作为预防精神病的首选治疗方案。然而,最近的荟萃分析证据表明,CHR中的抗精神病药物暴露相对普遍,并且与更高的即将转变为精神病的风险相关。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以更好地描述CHR个体的哪些临床特征可能导致抗精神病药物的选择,以及它是否确定了一个亚组转化为精神病的风险更高。方法:2016 - 2021年,对连续入组的CHR患者(N = 717)进行人口学及临床特征评估,随访3年(200例未到随访结束)。然后,根据抗精神病药物处方,将样本分为处方组(CHRAP+, n = 492)和非处方组(CHRAP-, n = 225),随后比较其社会人口学和临床特征。通过生存分析测试CHRAP+组与CHRAP-组转化为精神病的风险。结果:717例CHR患者中,492例(68.62%)使用抗精神病药物;在这些抗精神病药物中,使用比例最高的是阿立哌唑(n = 152),其次是奥氮平(n = 106)、氨硫pride (n = 76)和利培酮(n = 64)。CHRAP+组患者年龄更小(t = 2.138, P = 0.033),女性患者比例更高(χ2 = 5.084, P = 0.024),精神病症状更严重(t = 7.910, P = 5.846, P)。结论:临床医生可主要根据CHR患者阳性和紊乱症状的严重程度开具抗精神病药物。CHRAP+组转化为精神病的风险较高。从实用的角度来看,这一发现表明,在CHR队列中,基线抗精神病药物处方是精神病早期风险较高的警告信号,与抗精神病药物初始CHR相比,被指定为超CHR亚组。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04010864。
Antipsychotic Exposure in Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: Empirical Insights From a Large Cohort Study.
Objective: Current treatment guidelines for individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis do not recommend the prescription of antipsychotics (not even second-generation ones) as the first treatment option for preventing psychosis. Yet, recent meta-analytic evidence indicates that antipsychotic exposure in CHR is relatively widespread and associated with a higher imminent risk of transition to psychosis. Therefore, we undertook this study to better delineate which clinical characteristics of CHR individuals may lead to the choice of antipsychotic prescription and whether it identifies a subgroup at higher risk for conversion to psychosis.
Methods: Consecutively referred CHR individuals (N = 717) were assessed for demographic and clinical characteristics and followed up for 3 years (200 did not reach the end of the follow-up time) from 2016 to 2021. The sample was then dichotomized, on the basis of antipsychotic prescription, to prescribed (CHRAP+, n = 492) or not-prescribed (CHRAP-, n = 225) groups, which were subsequently compared for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The risks of conversion to psychosis in CHRAP+ versus CHRAP- groups were tested via survival analysis.
Results: Of the 717 CHR individuals, 492 (68.62%) were prescribed antipsychotics; among these antipsychotics, the highest proportion used was for aripiprazole (n = 152), followed by olanzapine (n = 106), amisulpride (n = 76), and risperidone (n = 64). The CHRAP+ group had younger age (t = 2.138, P = .033), higher proportion of female individuals (χ2 = 5.084, P = .024), psychotic symptoms of greater severity (t = 7.910, P < .001), and more impaired general function (t = 5.846, P < .001) than the CHRAP- group. The CHRAP+ group had greater risk for conversion to psychosis (27.0% in the CHRAP+ group vs 10.9% in the CHRAP- group, P < .001). Factors related to positive symptoms were the most likely to influence doctors' decision-making regarding prescripton of antipsychotics, without influence of age, sex, and education levels.
Conclusions: Clinicians may prescribe antipsychotics mainly based on the severity of positive and disorganization symptoms of CHR individuals. The CHRAP+ group was associated with a higher risk of conversion to psychosis. In pragmatic terms, this finding indicates that baseline antipsychotic prescription in CHR cohorts is a warning flag for higher incipient risk of psychosis and designates as hyper-CHR subgroup as compared to antipsychotic-naive CHR.