{"title":"干细胞治疗膝骨关节炎的系统评价和荟萃分析的方法学质量和偏倚风险:一项横断面调查。","authors":"Aifeng Liu, Weijie Yu, Jixin Chen, Tianci Guo, Puyu Niu, Huichuan Feng, Yizhen Jia","doi":"10.1089/scd.2022.0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical guidelines need high-quality studies to support clinical decision making, in which the evidence often was collected from systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses (MAs). At present, the methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) of SRs/MAs on stem cell therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has been poorly investigated. This study aims to strictly evaluate the methodological quality and RoB in SRs/MAs of stem cell therapy for KOA. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases) were searched, from inception to October 5, 2021. SRs/MAs involving randomized control trials or cohort studies on stem cell therapy for the treatment of KOA were included. The methodological quality and RoB were assessed using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tool, respectively. In total, 22 SRs/MAs were included. According to the results obtained by AMSTAR 2 tool, all SRs/MAs were rated as \"Critically low.\" Main methodological weaknesses were as follows: up to 81.82% did not meet protocol registration requirements, only 13.64% provided a list of excluded studies and justification, and 13.64% investigated and discussed the publication bias. ROBIS-based RoB assessment showed that all the SRs/MAs were rated as \"High.\" Besides, the lack of following the implementation of the PRISMA reporting guideline seems to reduce the methodological quality of the studies. The overall methodological quality of the SRs/MAs concerning the application of stem cell therapy in treating KOA is \"Critically low,\" while the RoB is high. It is difficult to provide effective evidence for the formulation of guidelines for KOA treatment. We suggest that the relevant methodological quality assessment should be carried out in the future before the SRs/MAs are used as clinical evidence. In addition, it may be necessary for many journals to include the checklist with a submitted article. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021246924.</p>","PeriodicalId":21934,"journal":{"name":"Stem cells and development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Aifeng Liu, Weijie Yu, Jixin Chen, Tianci Guo, Puyu Niu, Huichuan Feng, Yizhen Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/scd.2022.0060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical guidelines need high-quality studies to support clinical decision making, in which the evidence often was collected from systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses (MAs). At present, the methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) of SRs/MAs on stem cell therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has been poorly investigated. This study aims to strictly evaluate the methodological quality and RoB in SRs/MAs of stem cell therapy for KOA. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases) were searched, from inception to October 5, 2021. SRs/MAs involving randomized control trials or cohort studies on stem cell therapy for the treatment of KOA were included. The methodological quality and RoB were assessed using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tool, respectively. In total, 22 SRs/MAs were included. According to the results obtained by AMSTAR 2 tool, all SRs/MAs were rated as \\\"Critically low.\\\" Main methodological weaknesses were as follows: up to 81.82% did not meet protocol registration requirements, only 13.64% provided a list of excluded studies and justification, and 13.64% investigated and discussed the publication bias. ROBIS-based RoB assessment showed that all the SRs/MAs were rated as \\\"High.\\\" Besides, the lack of following the implementation of the PRISMA reporting guideline seems to reduce the methodological quality of the studies. The overall methodological quality of the SRs/MAs concerning the application of stem cell therapy in treating KOA is \\\"Critically low,\\\" while the RoB is high. It is difficult to provide effective evidence for the formulation of guidelines for KOA treatment. We suggest that the relevant methodological quality assessment should be carried out in the future before the SRs/MAs are used as clinical evidence. In addition, it may be necessary for many journals to include the checklist with a submitted article. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021246924.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stem cells and development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stem cells and development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2022.0060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem cells and development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2022.0060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
临床指南需要高质量的研究来支持临床决策,其中的证据通常来自系统评价(SRs)和/或荟萃分析(MAs)。目前,干细胞疗法治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的SRs/MAs的方法学质量和偏倚风险(RoB)研究甚少。本研究旨在严格评价干细胞治疗KOA的方法质量和SRs/MAs的RoB。检索了四个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库),检索时间从创立到2021年10月5日。纳入了涉及干细胞治疗KOA的随机对照试验或队列研究的SRs/MAs。分别使用AMSTAR 2和ROBIS工具评估方法学质量和RoB。总共包括22个sr / ma。根据AMSTAR 2工具获得的结果,所有的SRs/ ma都被评为“极低”。方法学的主要缺陷如下:高达81.82%的研究不符合方案注册要求,只有13.64%的研究提供了排除研究的清单和证明,13.64%的研究调查和讨论了发表偏倚。基于robis的RoB评估显示,所有的SRs/MAs都被评为“高”。此外,缺乏遵循PRISMA报告指南的实施似乎降低了研究的方法学质量。关于干细胞治疗KOA的应用的SRs/MAs的整体方法学质量“极低”,而RoB很高。很难为KOA治疗指南的制定提供有效的证据。我们建议,在将SRs/MAs用作临床证据之前,应进行相关的方法学质量评估。此外,许多期刊可能有必要在提交的文章中包含清单。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021246924。
Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Clinical guidelines need high-quality studies to support clinical decision making, in which the evidence often was collected from systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses (MAs). At present, the methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) of SRs/MAs on stem cell therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has been poorly investigated. This study aims to strictly evaluate the methodological quality and RoB in SRs/MAs of stem cell therapy for KOA. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases) were searched, from inception to October 5, 2021. SRs/MAs involving randomized control trials or cohort studies on stem cell therapy for the treatment of KOA were included. The methodological quality and RoB were assessed using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tool, respectively. In total, 22 SRs/MAs were included. According to the results obtained by AMSTAR 2 tool, all SRs/MAs were rated as "Critically low." Main methodological weaknesses were as follows: up to 81.82% did not meet protocol registration requirements, only 13.64% provided a list of excluded studies and justification, and 13.64% investigated and discussed the publication bias. ROBIS-based RoB assessment showed that all the SRs/MAs were rated as "High." Besides, the lack of following the implementation of the PRISMA reporting guideline seems to reduce the methodological quality of the studies. The overall methodological quality of the SRs/MAs concerning the application of stem cell therapy in treating KOA is "Critically low," while the RoB is high. It is difficult to provide effective evidence for the formulation of guidelines for KOA treatment. We suggest that the relevant methodological quality assessment should be carried out in the future before the SRs/MAs are used as clinical evidence. In addition, it may be necessary for many journals to include the checklist with a submitted article. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021246924.
期刊介绍:
Stem Cells and Development is globally recognized as the trusted source for critical, even controversial coverage of emerging hypotheses and novel findings. With a focus on stem cells of all tissue types and their potential therapeutic applications, the Journal provides clinical, basic, and translational scientists with cutting-edge research and findings.
Stem Cells and Development coverage includes:
Embryogenesis and adult counterparts of this process
Physical processes linking stem cells, primary cell function, and structural development
Hypotheses exploring the relationship between genotype and phenotype
Development of vasculature, CNS, and other germ layer development and defects
Pluripotentiality of embryonic and somatic stem cells
The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in development