DTRAX颈椎笼用于寰枢关节C1/2稳定的安全性和可行性。

Fabian Sommer, Sertac Kirnaz, Jacob L Goldberg, Lynn B McGrath, Franziska Schmidt, Pravesh Gadjradj, Branden Medary, Roger Härtl
{"title":"DTRAX颈椎笼用于寰枢关节C1/2稳定的安全性和可行性。","authors":"Fabian Sommer, Sertac Kirnaz, Jacob L Goldberg, Lynn B McGrath, Franziska Schmidt, Pravesh Gadjradj, Branden Medary, Roger Härtl","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000000139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Pathological changes in the atlantoaxial joint often lead to instability, pain, and neurological deterioration. One treatment option is the surgical stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint. In other areas of the spine, fusion rates have been improved by the introduction of an interbody cage. Our aim was to use cervical interbody spacers, originally designed to augment fusion across subaxial posterior cervical facets, to optimize the conditions for atlantoaxial fusion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implanting cervical cages in the atlantoaxial joint for C1/2 stabilization. METHODS: Our retrospective study evaluated patients who had undergone C1/2 cervical fusions by the Harms/Goel technique. This technique was modified by implanting a titanium cervical interbody spacer into the joint space. Mean overall pain, as measured by a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) and neurological outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition, radiological outcomes were collected using follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this case series. The mean preoperative VAS for overall pain was 5.0 ± 4.0, which changed to a mean VAS of 2.0 ± 3.0 after an average follow-up period of 41.4 ± 20.4 (P = .043). All patients showed a bony fusion in our case series. None of the radiological imaging during follow-up showed screw loosening, hardware breakage, implant migration, or nonunion. CONCLUSION: The implantation of cervical titanium cages into the atlantoaxial joint in combination with posterior fixation appears to be a safe and effective method for achieving C1/2 fusion.","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"322-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Feasibility of DTRAX Cervical Cages in the Atlantoaxial Joint for C1/2 Stabilization.\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Sommer, Sertac Kirnaz, Jacob L Goldberg, Lynn B McGrath, Franziska Schmidt, Pravesh Gadjradj, Branden Medary, Roger Härtl\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000000139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Pathological changes in the atlantoaxial joint often lead to instability, pain, and neurological deterioration. One treatment option is the surgical stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint. In other areas of the spine, fusion rates have been improved by the introduction of an interbody cage. Our aim was to use cervical interbody spacers, originally designed to augment fusion across subaxial posterior cervical facets, to optimize the conditions for atlantoaxial fusion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implanting cervical cages in the atlantoaxial joint for C1/2 stabilization. METHODS: Our retrospective study evaluated patients who had undergone C1/2 cervical fusions by the Harms/Goel technique. This technique was modified by implanting a titanium cervical interbody spacer into the joint space. Mean overall pain, as measured by a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) and neurological outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition, radiological outcomes were collected using follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this case series. The mean preoperative VAS for overall pain was 5.0 ± 4.0, which changed to a mean VAS of 2.0 ± 3.0 after an average follow-up period of 41.4 ± 20.4 (P = .043). All patients showed a bony fusion in our case series. None of the radiological imaging during follow-up showed screw loosening, hardware breakage, implant migration, or nonunion. CONCLUSION: The implantation of cervical titanium cages into the atlantoaxial joint in combination with posterior fixation appears to be a safe and effective method for achieving C1/2 fusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":520730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"322-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:寰枢关节的病理改变常导致不稳定、疼痛和神经功能恶化。一种治疗选择是寰枢关节的手术稳定。在脊柱的其他部位,椎间固定器的引入提高了融合率。我们的目的是使用颈椎椎间间隔器来优化寰枢椎融合的条件,该间隔器最初设计用于增强颈椎后亚轴小关节的融合。目的:评价寰枢关节内植入颈椎笼固定C1/2的安全性和有效性。方法:我们对采用Harms/Goel技术行C1/2颈椎融合的患者进行回顾性研究。该技术通过在关节间隙植入钛颈椎椎间垫片而得到改进。通过0 - 10视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量的平均总疼痛,以及术前和术后的神经预后。此外,通过随访影像学收集放射学结果。结果:9例患者纳入本病例系列。术前总疼痛的平均VAS为5.0±4.0,平均随访时间为41.4±20.4,平均VAS为2.0±3.0 (P = 0.043)。在我们的病例系列中,所有患者均出现骨融合。随访期间所有影像学检查均未显示螺钉松动、硬体断裂、植入物移位或骨不连。结论:颈椎钛笼植入寰枢关节联合后路固定是实现C1/2融合安全有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Feasibility of DTRAX Cervical Cages in the Atlantoaxial Joint for C1/2 Stabilization.
BACKGROUND: Pathological changes in the atlantoaxial joint often lead to instability, pain, and neurological deterioration. One treatment option is the surgical stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint. In other areas of the spine, fusion rates have been improved by the introduction of an interbody cage. Our aim was to use cervical interbody spacers, originally designed to augment fusion across subaxial posterior cervical facets, to optimize the conditions for atlantoaxial fusion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implanting cervical cages in the atlantoaxial joint for C1/2 stabilization. METHODS: Our retrospective study evaluated patients who had undergone C1/2 cervical fusions by the Harms/Goel technique. This technique was modified by implanting a titanium cervical interbody spacer into the joint space. Mean overall pain, as measured by a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) and neurological outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition, radiological outcomes were collected using follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this case series. The mean preoperative VAS for overall pain was 5.0 ± 4.0, which changed to a mean VAS of 2.0 ± 3.0 after an average follow-up period of 41.4 ± 20.4 (P = .043). All patients showed a bony fusion in our case series. None of the radiological imaging during follow-up showed screw loosening, hardware breakage, implant migration, or nonunion. CONCLUSION: The implantation of cervical titanium cages into the atlantoaxial joint in combination with posterior fixation appears to be a safe and effective method for achieving C1/2 fusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信