星偏移平衡试验检测慢性腰痛患者到达缺陷的效果。

G Shankar Ganesh, Deepak Chhabra, K Mrityunjay
{"title":"星偏移平衡试验检测慢性腰痛患者到达缺陷的效果。","authors":"G Shankar Ganesh,&nbsp;Deepak Chhabra,&nbsp;K Mrityunjay","doi":"10.1002/pri.1589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study design is a case control study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate how chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects the performance of Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain is associated with paraspinal and other trunk muscle weakness and reduction in coordination of low back muscles. This reduction in muscular strength and coordination contributes to decreased postural stability, balance and neuromuscular control in subjects with CLBP. SEBT is a simple, reliable and valid method of dynamic performance and is an alternative to more sophisticated instrumented methods. However, no study has evaluated the effect of SEBT on CLBP patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>Ten patients with CLBP (localized back pain, lasting more than 6 months and radiating no further than the buttock with normal neurological examination) and 10 normal age and sex matched subjects (mean age 34.30 + 8.67(range 22-50) participated in this study. All participants completed the SEBT on their dominant leg, and distance measures were collected and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dependant variable was analysed using independent t-test with p < 0.05. The CLBP group demonstrated significant reductions in excursion distances for all directions of the SEBT compared with the control group, except for the posterior (P) direction (0.281) CONCLUSION: Star Excursion Balance Test is an effective and simple tool to identify and measure reach deficits in patients with CLBP. We recommend using SEBT as an outcome measure to identify dynamic balance, multi-planar excursion and postural control in patients with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":519522,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","volume":" ","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1589","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of the star excursion balance test in detecting reach deficits in subjects with chronic low back pain.\",\"authors\":\"G Shankar Ganesh,&nbsp;Deepak Chhabra,&nbsp;K Mrityunjay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.1589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study design is a case control study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate how chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects the performance of Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain is associated with paraspinal and other trunk muscle weakness and reduction in coordination of low back muscles. This reduction in muscular strength and coordination contributes to decreased postural stability, balance and neuromuscular control in subjects with CLBP. SEBT is a simple, reliable and valid method of dynamic performance and is an alternative to more sophisticated instrumented methods. However, no study has evaluated the effect of SEBT on CLBP patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>Ten patients with CLBP (localized back pain, lasting more than 6 months and radiating no further than the buttock with normal neurological examination) and 10 normal age and sex matched subjects (mean age 34.30 + 8.67(range 22-50) participated in this study. All participants completed the SEBT on their dominant leg, and distance measures were collected and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dependant variable was analysed using independent t-test with p < 0.05. The CLBP group demonstrated significant reductions in excursion distances for all directions of the SEBT compared with the control group, except for the posterior (P) direction (0.281) CONCLUSION: Star Excursion Balance Test is an effective and simple tool to identify and measure reach deficits in patients with CLBP. We recommend using SEBT as an outcome measure to identify dynamic balance, multi-planar excursion and postural control in patients with CLBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1589\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

研究设计:研究设计为病例对照研究。目的:本研究的目的是评估慢性腰痛(CLBP)如何影响星偏移平衡测试(SEBT)的表现。背景:慢性腰痛与脊柱旁和其他躯干肌肉无力以及腰背部肌肉协调性降低有关。这种肌肉力量和协调性的降低导致CLBP患者的姿势稳定性、平衡性和神经肌肉控制能力下降。SEBT是一种简单、可靠和有效的动态性能测量方法,是更复杂的仪器测量方法的替代方法。然而,没有研究评估SEBT对CLBP患者的影响。方法和措施:10例CLBP患者(局限性背部疼痛,持续6个月以上,放射不超过臀部,神经学检查正常)和10例正常年龄和性别匹配的受试者(平均年龄34.30 + 8.67(范围22-50))。所有参与者都用主腿完成了SEBT测试,并收集了各组之间的距离测量值并进行了比较。结果:因变量分析采用独立t检验,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of the star excursion balance test in detecting reach deficits in subjects with chronic low back pain.

Study design: The study design is a case control study.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate how chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects the performance of Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).

Background: Chronic low back pain is associated with paraspinal and other trunk muscle weakness and reduction in coordination of low back muscles. This reduction in muscular strength and coordination contributes to decreased postural stability, balance and neuromuscular control in subjects with CLBP. SEBT is a simple, reliable and valid method of dynamic performance and is an alternative to more sophisticated instrumented methods. However, no study has evaluated the effect of SEBT on CLBP patients.

Methods and measures: Ten patients with CLBP (localized back pain, lasting more than 6 months and radiating no further than the buttock with normal neurological examination) and 10 normal age and sex matched subjects (mean age 34.30 + 8.67(range 22-50) participated in this study. All participants completed the SEBT on their dominant leg, and distance measures were collected and compared between groups.

Results: The dependant variable was analysed using independent t-test with p < 0.05. The CLBP group demonstrated significant reductions in excursion distances for all directions of the SEBT compared with the control group, except for the posterior (P) direction (0.281) CONCLUSION: Star Excursion Balance Test is an effective and simple tool to identify and measure reach deficits in patients with CLBP. We recommend using SEBT as an outcome measure to identify dynamic balance, multi-planar excursion and postural control in patients with CLBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信