降钙素原或其他感染标志物在A组链球菌急性扁桃体炎检测中有用吗?

Ann Marlene Gram Christensen, Marianne Kragh Thomsen, Therese Ovesen, Tejs Ehlers Klug
{"title":"降钙素原或其他感染标志物在A组链球菌急性扁桃体炎检测中有用吗?","authors":"Ann Marlene Gram Christensen,&nbsp;Marianne Kragh Thomsen,&nbsp;Therese Ovesen,&nbsp;Tejs Ehlers Klug","doi":"10.3109/00365548.2014.885656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Centor criteria and the streptococcal rapid antigen detection test (RADT) are commonly used to differentiate sore throat patients with group A streptococci (GAS) from patients with other pathogens. We aimed to investigate if procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) could increase the diagnostic accuracy when added to the Centor score and RADT, or be used instead of the RADT, in the differential diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 6-month prospective study was carried out in a Danish general practice with 8 physicians. One hundred acute tonsillitis patients aged 15 to 40 y were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of GAS was 26%. The sensitivity (90%) and specificity (97%) of the RADT were high. Mean values of CRP, WBC, and ANC were significantly higher in patients with GAS compared to non-GAS patients (p < 0.001). However, the sensitivities (66-90%) and specificities (45-75%) were low. No difference in PCT levels was found (p = 0.334). CRP was the most reliable infection marker (sensitivity 90% and specificity 45%) for GAS aetiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the RADT were higher than those of the 4 measured infection markers in the differentiation between GAS and non-GAS acute tonsillitis patients. The infection markers did not increase the diagnostic accuracy when added to the Centor score and RADT. When RADT is not available, measurement of CRP or ANC may increase the diagnostic accuracy in the detection of GAS-positive patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21541,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.885656","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are procalcitonin or other infection markers useful in the detection of group A streptococcal acute tonsillitis?\",\"authors\":\"Ann Marlene Gram Christensen,&nbsp;Marianne Kragh Thomsen,&nbsp;Therese Ovesen,&nbsp;Tejs Ehlers Klug\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/00365548.2014.885656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Centor criteria and the streptococcal rapid antigen detection test (RADT) are commonly used to differentiate sore throat patients with group A streptococci (GAS) from patients with other pathogens. We aimed to investigate if procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) could increase the diagnostic accuracy when added to the Centor score and RADT, or be used instead of the RADT, in the differential diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 6-month prospective study was carried out in a Danish general practice with 8 physicians. One hundred acute tonsillitis patients aged 15 to 40 y were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of GAS was 26%. The sensitivity (90%) and specificity (97%) of the RADT were high. Mean values of CRP, WBC, and ANC were significantly higher in patients with GAS compared to non-GAS patients (p < 0.001). However, the sensitivities (66-90%) and specificities (45-75%) were low. No difference in PCT levels was found (p = 0.334). CRP was the most reliable infection marker (sensitivity 90% and specificity 45%) for GAS aetiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the RADT were higher than those of the 4 measured infection markers in the differentiation between GAS and non-GAS acute tonsillitis patients. The infection markers did not increase the diagnostic accuracy when added to the Centor score and RADT. When RADT is not available, measurement of CRP or ANC may increase the diagnostic accuracy in the detection of GAS-positive patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.885656\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.885656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.885656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

背景:常用Centor标准和链球菌快速抗原检测试验(RADT)来区分A组链球菌(GAS)咽喉痛患者和其他病原体患者。我们的目的是研究降钙素原(PCT)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数(WBC)和绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)是否可以增加Centor评分和RADT的诊断准确性,或者代替RADT用于鉴别诊断。方法:一项为期6个月的前瞻性研究在丹麦全科医生8进行。研究对象为100例15 ~ 40岁的急性扁桃体炎患者。结果:GAS的患病率为26%。RADT具有较高的灵敏度(90%)和特异性(97%)。与非GAS患者相比,GAS患者CRP、WBC和ANC的平均值显著升高(p < 0.001)。然而,敏感性(66-90%)和特异性(45-75%)较低。PCT水平差异无统计学意义(p = 0.334)。CRP是GAS病因最可靠的感染标志物(敏感性90%,特异性45%)。结论:RADT在鉴别急性扁桃体炎与非急性扁桃体炎的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积均高于4种检测感染标志物。当将感染标记物与Centor评分和RADT加在一起时,并没有增加诊断的准确性。当不能使用RADT时,测量CRP或ANC可提高检测gas阳性患者的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are procalcitonin or other infection markers useful in the detection of group A streptococcal acute tonsillitis?

Background: The Centor criteria and the streptococcal rapid antigen detection test (RADT) are commonly used to differentiate sore throat patients with group A streptococci (GAS) from patients with other pathogens. We aimed to investigate if procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) could increase the diagnostic accuracy when added to the Centor score and RADT, or be used instead of the RADT, in the differential diagnosis.

Methods: A 6-month prospective study was carried out in a Danish general practice with 8 physicians. One hundred acute tonsillitis patients aged 15 to 40 y were included.

Results: The prevalence of GAS was 26%. The sensitivity (90%) and specificity (97%) of the RADT were high. Mean values of CRP, WBC, and ANC were significantly higher in patients with GAS compared to non-GAS patients (p < 0.001). However, the sensitivities (66-90%) and specificities (45-75%) were low. No difference in PCT levels was found (p = 0.334). CRP was the most reliable infection marker (sensitivity 90% and specificity 45%) for GAS aetiology.

Conclusions: The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the RADT were higher than those of the 4 measured infection markers in the differentiation between GAS and non-GAS acute tonsillitis patients. The infection markers did not increase the diagnostic accuracy when added to the Centor score and RADT. When RADT is not available, measurement of CRP or ANC may increase the diagnostic accuracy in the detection of GAS-positive patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信