荷兰海员工作适能资格的结果。

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) Pub Date : 2014-06-01 Epub Date: 2014-03-06 DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqu020
J Zevallos, C T Hulshof, T Mutsaerts, J K Sluiter
{"title":"荷兰海员工作适能资格的结果。","authors":"J Zevallos,&nbsp;C T Hulshof,&nbsp;T Mutsaerts,&nbsp;J K Sluiter","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqu020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seafaring is a dangerous profession involving high fatality rates and little research has been done to identify conditions that may lead to failing the seafarer's medical qualification (SMQ).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the proportion of seafarers failing to pass the SMQ in the Netherlands during 2012, to analyse the outcomes of the SMQ according to qualification, age, duties and requirements of additional evaluations and to describe the reasons for considering a seafarer unfit for duty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective descriptive study of SMQs registered in the Netherlands Shipping Inspectorate database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Less than 1% (46 cases; 0.6%) of the 7617 final SMQ candidates were considered unfit for duty with 53% (24) of these being temporarily unfit. Four per cent (276) of cases were classified 'fit with restrictions' and 1% (66) 'fit by exemption' (FEx). Re-examination was required in 2% (122) of cases. A second opinion from a medical referee was sought in 4% of cases. The highest rate of FEx was found in older seafarers (aged over 55) due to restrictions in hearing and vision in the majority (59%) of cases. The leading causes of unfitness were other medical reasons, mainly associated with cardiovascular conditions and morbid obesity, in 52% of cases and visual impairment in 34%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of seafarers considered unfit in the SMQ carried out in the Netherlands in 2012 is relatively low. The proportion of FEx was higher in older groups, mainly due to hearing or visual impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"267-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqu020","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of seafarer work fitness qualifications in the Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"J Zevallos,&nbsp;C T Hulshof,&nbsp;T Mutsaerts,&nbsp;J K Sluiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqu020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seafaring is a dangerous profession involving high fatality rates and little research has been done to identify conditions that may lead to failing the seafarer's medical qualification (SMQ).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the proportion of seafarers failing to pass the SMQ in the Netherlands during 2012, to analyse the outcomes of the SMQ according to qualification, age, duties and requirements of additional evaluations and to describe the reasons for considering a seafarer unfit for duty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective descriptive study of SMQs registered in the Netherlands Shipping Inspectorate database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Less than 1% (46 cases; 0.6%) of the 7617 final SMQ candidates were considered unfit for duty with 53% (24) of these being temporarily unfit. Four per cent (276) of cases were classified 'fit with restrictions' and 1% (66) 'fit by exemption' (FEx). Re-examination was required in 2% (122) of cases. A second opinion from a medical referee was sought in 4% of cases. The highest rate of FEx was found in older seafarers (aged over 55) due to restrictions in hearing and vision in the majority (59%) of cases. The leading causes of unfitness were other medical reasons, mainly associated with cardiovascular conditions and morbid obesity, in 52% of cases and visual impairment in 34%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of seafarers considered unfit in the SMQ carried out in the Netherlands in 2012 is relatively low. The proportion of FEx was higher in older groups, mainly due to hearing or visual impairments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"267-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqu020\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:航海是一项危险的职业,涉及高死亡率,很少进行研究以确定可能导致海员不合格的医疗资格(SMQ)的条件。目的:确定2012年荷兰未通过SMQ的海员比例,根据资格、年龄、职责和附加评估要求分析SMQ的结果,并描述认为海员不适合执勤的原因。方法:对荷兰船舶检查局数据库中注册的smq进行回顾性描述性研究。结果:小于1%(46例;在7617名最终的SMQ候选人中,0.6%的人被认为不适合工作,其中53%(24人)暂时不适合工作。百分之四(276)的个案被列为“符合限制”,百分之一(66)个案被列为“符合限制”。“豁免适用”(FEx)。2%(122)的病例需要复查。在4%的案件中寻求医学裁判的第二意见。FEx在年龄较大的海员(55岁以上)中发病率最高,因为大多数(59%)病例的听力和视力受到限制。不健康的主要原因是其他医学原因,主要与心血管疾病和病态肥胖有关,占52%,视力障碍占34%。结论:在2012年荷兰进行的SMQ中,被认为不适合的海员比例相对较低。FEx的比例在老年人中较高,主要是由于听力或视觉障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of seafarer work fitness qualifications in the Netherlands.

Background: Seafaring is a dangerous profession involving high fatality rates and little research has been done to identify conditions that may lead to failing the seafarer's medical qualification (SMQ).

Aims: To determine the proportion of seafarers failing to pass the SMQ in the Netherlands during 2012, to analyse the outcomes of the SMQ according to qualification, age, duties and requirements of additional evaluations and to describe the reasons for considering a seafarer unfit for duty.

Methods: A retrospective descriptive study of SMQs registered in the Netherlands Shipping Inspectorate database.

Results: Less than 1% (46 cases; 0.6%) of the 7617 final SMQ candidates were considered unfit for duty with 53% (24) of these being temporarily unfit. Four per cent (276) of cases were classified 'fit with restrictions' and 1% (66) 'fit by exemption' (FEx). Re-examination was required in 2% (122) of cases. A second opinion from a medical referee was sought in 4% of cases. The highest rate of FEx was found in older seafarers (aged over 55) due to restrictions in hearing and vision in the majority (59%) of cases. The leading causes of unfitness were other medical reasons, mainly associated with cardiovascular conditions and morbid obesity, in 52% of cases and visual impairment in 34%.

Conclusions: The proportion of seafarers considered unfit in the SMQ carried out in the Netherlands in 2012 is relatively low. The proportion of FEx was higher in older groups, mainly due to hearing or visual impairments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信