矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂起始时间对心力衰竭患者死亡风险的重要性。

Rosario Rossi, Nicola Crupi, Francesca Coppi, Daniel Monopoli, Fabio Sgura
{"title":"矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂起始时间对心力衰竭患者死亡风险的重要性。","authors":"Rosario Rossi,&nbsp;Nicola Crupi,&nbsp;Francesca Coppi,&nbsp;Daniel Monopoli,&nbsp;Fabio Sgura","doi":"10.1177/1470320313482603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several studies have definitively shown the benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure (HF). However, very few prior studies examined the relationship between the timing of initiation of MRAs and prognosis. In addition, on this topic, there is no information regarding the specific population of patients suffering a first episode of decompensated congestive HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied a homogenous cohort of patients discharged alive from our hospital after a first episode of decompensated congestive HF, in order to clarify the association between time of aldosterone receptor antagonist (ARA) initiation (within the first 90 days after hospital discharge) and mortality. Our population was composed of a series of consecutive patients. All-cause mortality was compared between patients who initiated MRAs at discharge (early group) and those who initiated MRAs one month later and up to 90 days after discharge (delayed group). We used prescription time distribution matching to control for survival difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The early and delayed groups consisted of 365 and 320 patients, respectively. During the one-year follow-up, a significant difference in mortality was demonstrated between groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for early versus delayed initiation were 1.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 2.84) at six months, and 1.93 (95% CI 1.18 to 3.14) at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delay of MRA initiation up to 30 to 90 days after discharge implies a significant increase in mortality compared with MRA initiation at discharge, after a first episode of decompensate congestive HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":520698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS","volume":" ","pages":"119-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1470320313482603","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of the time of initiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on risk of mortality in patients with heart failure.\",\"authors\":\"Rosario Rossi,&nbsp;Nicola Crupi,&nbsp;Francesca Coppi,&nbsp;Daniel Monopoli,&nbsp;Fabio Sgura\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1470320313482603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several studies have definitively shown the benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure (HF). However, very few prior studies examined the relationship between the timing of initiation of MRAs and prognosis. In addition, on this topic, there is no information regarding the specific population of patients suffering a first episode of decompensated congestive HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied a homogenous cohort of patients discharged alive from our hospital after a first episode of decompensated congestive HF, in order to clarify the association between time of aldosterone receptor antagonist (ARA) initiation (within the first 90 days after hospital discharge) and mortality. Our population was composed of a series of consecutive patients. All-cause mortality was compared between patients who initiated MRAs at discharge (early group) and those who initiated MRAs one month later and up to 90 days after discharge (delayed group). We used prescription time distribution matching to control for survival difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The early and delayed groups consisted of 365 and 320 patients, respectively. During the one-year follow-up, a significant difference in mortality was demonstrated between groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for early versus delayed initiation were 1.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 2.84) at six months, and 1.93 (95% CI 1.18 to 3.14) at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delay of MRA initiation up to 30 to 90 days after discharge implies a significant increase in mortality compared with MRA initiation at discharge, after a first episode of decompensate congestive HF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1470320313482603\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320313482603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320313482603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

几项研究明确显示矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)对心力衰竭(HF)患者的益处。然而,很少有先前的研究检查了mra起始时间与预后之间的关系。此外,关于这一主题,没有关于失代偿性充血性心力衰竭首发患者的特定人群的信息。方法:我们研究了一组同质队列的失代偿性充血性HF首次发作后存活出院的患者,以阐明醛固酮受体拮抗剂(ARA)起始时间(出院后90天内)与死亡率之间的关系。我们的人群是由一系列连续的病人组成的。比较在出院时开始mra的患者(早期组)和在出院后一个月和90天内开始mra的患者(延迟组)的全因死亡率。我们使用处方时间分布匹配来控制组间生存差异。结果:早期组365例,延迟组320例。在一年的随访中,两组之间的死亡率有显著差异。6个月时早期起始与延迟起始的校正风险比(hr)为1.72(95%可信区间(CI) 0.96 - 2.84), 1年时为1.93 (95% CI 1.18 - 3.14)。结论:与首次失代偿性充血性心力衰竭发作后出院时开始MRA相比,延迟至出院后30至90天开始MRA意味着死亡率显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Importance of the time of initiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on risk of mortality in patients with heart failure.

Introduction: Several studies have definitively shown the benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure (HF). However, very few prior studies examined the relationship between the timing of initiation of MRAs and prognosis. In addition, on this topic, there is no information regarding the specific population of patients suffering a first episode of decompensated congestive HF.

Methods: We studied a homogenous cohort of patients discharged alive from our hospital after a first episode of decompensated congestive HF, in order to clarify the association between time of aldosterone receptor antagonist (ARA) initiation (within the first 90 days after hospital discharge) and mortality. Our population was composed of a series of consecutive patients. All-cause mortality was compared between patients who initiated MRAs at discharge (early group) and those who initiated MRAs one month later and up to 90 days after discharge (delayed group). We used prescription time distribution matching to control for survival difference between groups.

Results: The early and delayed groups consisted of 365 and 320 patients, respectively. During the one-year follow-up, a significant difference in mortality was demonstrated between groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for early versus delayed initiation were 1.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 2.84) at six months, and 1.93 (95% CI 1.18 to 3.14) at one year.

Conclusions: Delay of MRA initiation up to 30 to 90 days after discharge implies a significant increase in mortality compared with MRA initiation at discharge, after a first episode of decompensate congestive HF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信