奥沙利铂和丸调5-氟尿嘧啶作为晚期胰腺癌的二线治疗:丸调方案是否可以取代FOLFOX作为二线治疗方案?

ISRN oncology Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-24 DOI:10.1155/2013/358538
A Azmy, S Abdelwahab, M Yassen
{"title":"奥沙利铂和丸调5-氟尿嘧啶作为晚期胰腺癌的二线治疗:丸调方案是否可以取代FOLFOX作为二线治疗方案?","authors":"A Azmy,&nbsp;S Abdelwahab,&nbsp;M Yassen","doi":"10.1155/2013/358538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective. Comparing activity of 2 regimens combining oxaliplatin to bolus modulated fluorouracil as second line treatment in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma pretreated with gemcitabine-containing schedule. Methods. Forty eight patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either FU 500 mg/m(2) IV bolus weekly ×6 weeks plus leucovorin 500 mg/m(2) IV weekly for 6 weeks during each 8-week cycle plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) IV on weeks 1, 3, and 5 of each 8-week (FLOX) OR receive weekly intravenous infusions of oxaliplatin 40 mg/m(2), 5-FU 500 mg/m(2), and leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) (3 weeks on, 1 week off). Results. Non progression(PR+SD) was found in 33.5% for first regimen and 29% for second regimen, and 37.5% had clinical benefit (FLOX regimen) compared to 50% in 3-weeks regimen. The median TTP was 3.9,4 months respectively. Median OS was 8, 9 months for both regimens. Only one case in 3-weeks arm suffered from grade IV diarrhea. Two cases > grade 2 neutropenia were observed; one in each treatment groups. Grade 3 anemia was recorded in 3 patients (2 in FLOX arm, one in 3-weeks arm). Conclusions. Both regimens showed encouraging efficacy, acceptable toxicity, and clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":89399,"journal":{"name":"ISRN oncology","volume":" ","pages":"358538"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/358538","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxaliplatin and Bolus-Modulated 5-Fluorouracil as a Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Can Bolus Regimens Replace FOLFOX When Considered for Second Line?\",\"authors\":\"A Azmy,&nbsp;S Abdelwahab,&nbsp;M Yassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/358538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective. Comparing activity of 2 regimens combining oxaliplatin to bolus modulated fluorouracil as second line treatment in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma pretreated with gemcitabine-containing schedule. Methods. Forty eight patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either FU 500 mg/m(2) IV bolus weekly ×6 weeks plus leucovorin 500 mg/m(2) IV weekly for 6 weeks during each 8-week cycle plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) IV on weeks 1, 3, and 5 of each 8-week (FLOX) OR receive weekly intravenous infusions of oxaliplatin 40 mg/m(2), 5-FU 500 mg/m(2), and leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) (3 weeks on, 1 week off). Results. Non progression(PR+SD) was found in 33.5% for first regimen and 29% for second regimen, and 37.5% had clinical benefit (FLOX regimen) compared to 50% in 3-weeks regimen. The median TTP was 3.9,4 months respectively. Median OS was 8, 9 months for both regimens. Only one case in 3-weeks arm suffered from grade IV diarrhea. Two cases > grade 2 neutropenia were observed; one in each treatment groups. Grade 3 anemia was recorded in 3 patients (2 in FLOX arm, one in 3-weeks arm). Conclusions. Both regimens showed encouraging efficacy, acceptable toxicity, and clinical benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"358538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/358538\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/358538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/358538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目标。比较两种方案联合奥沙利铂和大剂量调节氟尿嘧啶作为二线治疗晚期胰腺腺癌用吉西他滨方案预处理的活性。方法。48例晚期胰腺腺癌患者被随机分配接受FU 500 mg/m(2)静脉滴注,每周×6周,每周加亚叶酸500 mg/m(2)静脉滴注,每8周6周,每8周1、3和5周加奥沙利铂85 mg/m(2)静脉滴注(FLOX),或接受奥沙利铂40 mg/m(2), 5-FU 500 mg/m(2)和亚叶酸250 mg/m(2)静脉滴注(3周,1周停药)。结果。第一方案中有33.5%的患者无进展(PR+SD),第二方案中有29%,37.5%的患者有临床获益(FLOX方案),而3周方案中有50%。中位TTP分别为3.9和4个月。两种方案的中位OS均为8.9个月。3周臂仅1例出现IV级腹泻。2例> 2级中性粒细胞减少;每个治疗组一个。3例患者记录了3级贫血(2例在FLOX组,1例在3周组)。结论。两种方案均显示出令人鼓舞的疗效、可接受的毒性和临床效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Oxaliplatin and Bolus-Modulated 5-Fluorouracil as a Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Can Bolus Regimens Replace FOLFOX When Considered for Second Line?

Oxaliplatin and Bolus-Modulated 5-Fluorouracil as a Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Can Bolus Regimens Replace FOLFOX When Considered for Second Line?

Objective. Comparing activity of 2 regimens combining oxaliplatin to bolus modulated fluorouracil as second line treatment in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma pretreated with gemcitabine-containing schedule. Methods. Forty eight patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either FU 500 mg/m(2) IV bolus weekly ×6 weeks plus leucovorin 500 mg/m(2) IV weekly for 6 weeks during each 8-week cycle plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) IV on weeks 1, 3, and 5 of each 8-week (FLOX) OR receive weekly intravenous infusions of oxaliplatin 40 mg/m(2), 5-FU 500 mg/m(2), and leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) (3 weeks on, 1 week off). Results. Non progression(PR+SD) was found in 33.5% for first regimen and 29% for second regimen, and 37.5% had clinical benefit (FLOX regimen) compared to 50% in 3-weeks regimen. The median TTP was 3.9,4 months respectively. Median OS was 8, 9 months for both regimens. Only one case in 3-weeks arm suffered from grade IV diarrhea. Two cases > grade 2 neutropenia were observed; one in each treatment groups. Grade 3 anemia was recorded in 3 patients (2 in FLOX arm, one in 3-weeks arm). Conclusions. Both regimens showed encouraging efficacy, acceptable toxicity, and clinical benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信