中性粒细胞减少性癌症患者社区发病肺炎的治疗:β-内酰胺单药治疗与联合抗生素治疗方案

IF 8.5 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pneumonia Pub Date : 2019-06-05 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s41479-019-0061-1
Hyeri Seok, Jae-Hoon Ko, Kyong Ran Peck, Ji-Yeon Kim, Ji Hye Lee, Ga Eun Park, Sun Young Cho, Cheol-In Kang, Nam Yong Lee, Doo Ryeon Chung
{"title":"中性粒细胞减少性癌症患者社区发病肺炎的治疗:β-内酰胺单药治疗与联合抗生素治疗方案","authors":"Hyeri Seok,&nbsp;Jae-Hoon Ko,&nbsp;Kyong Ran Peck,&nbsp;Ji-Yeon Kim,&nbsp;Ji Hye Lee,&nbsp;Ga Eun Park,&nbsp;Sun Young Cho,&nbsp;Cheol-In Kang,&nbsp;Nam Yong Lee,&nbsp;Doo Ryeon Chung","doi":"10.1186/s41479-019-0061-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although β-lactam monotherapy may be sufficient in non-critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia, the value of combination antibiotic regimens in community-onset neutropenic pneumonia remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the effects of combination antibiotic regimens to those of β-lactam monotherapy in cancer patients with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia. Electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia between March 1995 and February 2015 at a tertiary care center were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 165 cancer patients with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia were identified. Seventy-two patients received β-lactam monotherapy and 93 received combination therapy (β-lactam plus either a macrolide or fluoroquinolone). Causative pathogens were identified in 27.9% of the patients, and only two were positive for atypical pathogens. Although 30-day mortality was higher in the β-lactam group (15.3% versus 4.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.015), combination therapy was not associated with a statistically significant survival benefit in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.20-3.67; <i>P</i> = 0.827). Duration of neutropenia, C-reactive protein level, and Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index were significant factors for 30-day mortality. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with cefepime, the most frequently used β-lactam (63.0%), combination therapy also showed no significant survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination antibiotic regimens were not associated with a survival benefit over β-lactam monotherapy in the treatment of community-onset neutropenic pneumonia. Unnecessary combination therapy should be reconsidered in cancer patients who are at high risk for adverse drug reactions and colonization with multi-drug resistant organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":45120,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonia","volume":" ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41479-019-0061-1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of community-onset pneumonia in neutropenic cancer patients: β-lactam monotherapy versus combination antibiotic regimens.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeri Seok,&nbsp;Jae-Hoon Ko,&nbsp;Kyong Ran Peck,&nbsp;Ji-Yeon Kim,&nbsp;Ji Hye Lee,&nbsp;Ga Eun Park,&nbsp;Sun Young Cho,&nbsp;Cheol-In Kang,&nbsp;Nam Yong Lee,&nbsp;Doo Ryeon Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41479-019-0061-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although β-lactam monotherapy may be sufficient in non-critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia, the value of combination antibiotic regimens in community-onset neutropenic pneumonia remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the effects of combination antibiotic regimens to those of β-lactam monotherapy in cancer patients with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia. Electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia between March 1995 and February 2015 at a tertiary care center were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 165 cancer patients with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia were identified. Seventy-two patients received β-lactam monotherapy and 93 received combination therapy (β-lactam plus either a macrolide or fluoroquinolone). Causative pathogens were identified in 27.9% of the patients, and only two were positive for atypical pathogens. Although 30-day mortality was higher in the β-lactam group (15.3% versus 4.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.015), combination therapy was not associated with a statistically significant survival benefit in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.20-3.67; <i>P</i> = 0.827). Duration of neutropenia, C-reactive protein level, and Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index were significant factors for 30-day mortality. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with cefepime, the most frequently used β-lactam (63.0%), combination therapy also showed no significant survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination antibiotic regimens were not associated with a survival benefit over β-lactam monotherapy in the treatment of community-onset neutropenic pneumonia. Unnecessary combination therapy should be reconsidered in cancer patients who are at high risk for adverse drug reactions and colonization with multi-drug resistant organisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pneumonia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41479-019-0061-1\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pneumonia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-019-0061-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-019-0061-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:虽然β-内酰胺单药治疗可能足以治疗社区获得性肺炎的非危重患者,但联合抗生素治疗社区发病中性粒细胞减少性肺炎的价值尚不清楚。方法:回顾性队列研究,比较抗生素联合治疗方案与β-内酰胺单药治疗癌症合并社区发病中性粒细胞减少性肺炎的疗效。回顾了1995年3月至2015年2月在三级保健中心诊断为社区发病中性粒细胞减少性肺炎的患者的电子病历。结果:在研究期间,确诊了165例社区发病中性粒细胞减少性肺炎的癌症患者。72名患者接受β-内酰胺单药治疗,93名患者接受联合治疗(β-内酰胺加大环内酯或氟喹诺酮)。27.9%的患者检出致病菌,仅有2例非典型致病菌阳性。虽然β-内酰胺组的30天死亡率更高(15.3%对4.3%;P = 0.015),在多因素分析中,联合治疗与统计学上显著的生存获益无关(风险比0.85,95%可信区间0.20-3.67;p = 0.827)。中性粒细胞减少持续时间、c反应蛋白水平和多国癌症支持治疗协会风险指数是影响30天死亡率的重要因素。在用头孢吡肟治疗的患者的亚组分析中,最常用的β-内酰胺(63.0%)联合治疗也没有显着的生存获益。结论:与β-内酰胺单药治疗相比,联合抗生素治疗与社区发病中性粒细胞减少性肺炎的生存获益无关。对于存在药物不良反应和多药耐药菌定植高风险的癌症患者,应重新考虑不必要的联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of community-onset pneumonia in neutropenic cancer patients: β-lactam monotherapy versus combination antibiotic regimens.

Background: Although β-lactam monotherapy may be sufficient in non-critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia, the value of combination antibiotic regimens in community-onset neutropenic pneumonia remains unclear.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the effects of combination antibiotic regimens to those of β-lactam monotherapy in cancer patients with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia. Electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia between March 1995 and February 2015 at a tertiary care center were reviewed.

Results: During the study period, 165 cancer patients with community-onset neutropenic pneumonia were identified. Seventy-two patients received β-lactam monotherapy and 93 received combination therapy (β-lactam plus either a macrolide or fluoroquinolone). Causative pathogens were identified in 27.9% of the patients, and only two were positive for atypical pathogens. Although 30-day mortality was higher in the β-lactam group (15.3% versus 4.3%; P = 0.015), combination therapy was not associated with a statistically significant survival benefit in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.20-3.67; P = 0.827). Duration of neutropenia, C-reactive protein level, and Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index were significant factors for 30-day mortality. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with cefepime, the most frequently used β-lactam (63.0%), combination therapy also showed no significant survival benefit.

Conclusions: Combination antibiotic regimens were not associated with a survival benefit over β-lactam monotherapy in the treatment of community-onset neutropenic pneumonia. Unnecessary combination therapy should be reconsidered in cancer patients who are at high risk for adverse drug reactions and colonization with multi-drug resistant organisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumonia
Pneumonia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
1.50%
发文量
7
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信