Ali Riza Erbay, Murat Meric, Hasan Alacam, Halit Zengin, Filiz Akin, Ali Okuyucu, Serkan Yuksel, Korhan Soylu, Omer Gedikli
{"title":"非杓型高血压患者血清尿紧张素II水平。","authors":"Ali Riza Erbay, Murat Meric, Hasan Alacam, Halit Zengin, Filiz Akin, Ali Okuyucu, Serkan Yuksel, Korhan Soylu, Omer Gedikli","doi":"10.3109/10641963.2012.758276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypertension terms “dipper” and “non-dipper” are propounded by the change that occurs during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The purpose of this study is to present whether the serum urotensin II levels are different in patients with dipper and non-dipper hypertension and to put forward the effects causing this difference, if there are any. Patients recently diagnosed with hypertension were included in the study. With ambulatory BP monitoring, 81 patients with high BP were divided into two groups, dipper (n = 40) and non-dipper (n = 41). Serum urotensin II levels were analyzed by ELISA method. Serum urotensin II levels were higher in patients with non-dipper hypertension than in patients with dipper hypertension (204 [106–533] vs. 140 [96–309], P = .004). There was a positive correlation between total systolic BP and serum urotensin II levels (r = 0.408 and P = .009), but the relation in the non-dipper hypertension group was not significant (r = 0.194 and P = .2). In conclusion, serum urotensin II levels were higher in non-dipper HT patients than dipper HT patients. This higher urotensin II level might be responsible for poor prognoses.","PeriodicalId":286988,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)","volume":" ","pages":"506-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10641963.2012.758276","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serum urotensin II levels in patients with non-dipper hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Riza Erbay, Murat Meric, Hasan Alacam, Halit Zengin, Filiz Akin, Ali Okuyucu, Serkan Yuksel, Korhan Soylu, Omer Gedikli\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10641963.2012.758276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hypertension terms “dipper” and “non-dipper” are propounded by the change that occurs during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The purpose of this study is to present whether the serum urotensin II levels are different in patients with dipper and non-dipper hypertension and to put forward the effects causing this difference, if there are any. Patients recently diagnosed with hypertension were included in the study. With ambulatory BP monitoring, 81 patients with high BP were divided into two groups, dipper (n = 40) and non-dipper (n = 41). Serum urotensin II levels were analyzed by ELISA method. Serum urotensin II levels were higher in patients with non-dipper hypertension than in patients with dipper hypertension (204 [106–533] vs. 140 [96–309], P = .004). There was a positive correlation between total systolic BP and serum urotensin II levels (r = 0.408 and P = .009), but the relation in the non-dipper hypertension group was not significant (r = 0.194 and P = .2). In conclusion, serum urotensin II levels were higher in non-dipper HT patients than dipper HT patients. This higher urotensin II level might be responsible for poor prognoses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"506-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10641963.2012.758276\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10641963.2012.758276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10641963.2012.758276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
高血压术语“斗”和“非斗”是由于动态血压(BP)监测期间发生的变化而提出的。本研究的目的是了解斗型和非斗型高血压患者血清尿紧张素II水平是否存在差异,如果存在差异,则提出造成这种差异的影响。最近被诊断为高血压的患者被纳入研究。通过动态血压监测,将81例高血压患者分为两组,40例为侧倾血压组,41例为非侧倾血压组。ELISA法分析血清尿紧张素II水平。非杓型高血压患者血清尿紧张素II水平高于杓型高血压患者(204[106-533]对140 [96-309],P = 0.004)。总收缩压与血清尿紧张素II水平呈正相关(r = 0.408, P = 0.009),而非肾盂高血压组相关性不显著(r = 0.194, P = 0.2)。结论:未使用勺型HT的患者血清尿紧张素II水平高于使用勺型HT的患者。较高的尿紧张素II水平可能是不良预后的原因。
Serum urotensin II levels in patients with non-dipper hypertension.
Hypertension terms “dipper” and “non-dipper” are propounded by the change that occurs during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The purpose of this study is to present whether the serum urotensin II levels are different in patients with dipper and non-dipper hypertension and to put forward the effects causing this difference, if there are any. Patients recently diagnosed with hypertension were included in the study. With ambulatory BP monitoring, 81 patients with high BP were divided into two groups, dipper (n = 40) and non-dipper (n = 41). Serum urotensin II levels were analyzed by ELISA method. Serum urotensin II levels were higher in patients with non-dipper hypertension than in patients with dipper hypertension (204 [106–533] vs. 140 [96–309], P = .004). There was a positive correlation between total systolic BP and serum urotensin II levels (r = 0.408 and P = .009), but the relation in the non-dipper hypertension group was not significant (r = 0.194 and P = .2). In conclusion, serum urotensin II levels were higher in non-dipper HT patients than dipper HT patients. This higher urotensin II level might be responsible for poor prognoses.