病人患病证明——医生的工作环境问题?

T Ljungquist, E Hinas, B Arrelöv, C Lindholm, A L Wilteus, G H Nilsson, K Alexanderson
{"title":"病人患病证明——医生的工作环境问题?","authors":"T Ljungquist,&nbsp;E Hinas,&nbsp;B Arrelöv,&nbsp;C Lindholm,&nbsp;A L Wilteus,&nbsp;G H Nilsson,&nbsp;K Alexanderson","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqs080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to several studies, physicians find sickness certification of patients to be problematic, and some smaller studies suggest that this is a psychosocial work environment problem (WEP).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore to what extent physicians experience sickness certification as a WEP and the associations of this with the type of clinic and other workplace factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses of data from a questionnaire sent to all physicians who were living and working in Sweden. The study group consisted of physicians aged <65 years who performed sickness certification tasks (SCTs). Prevalence rates (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of finding SCTs as a WEP in relation to background factors were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 61%. The final study group consisted of 14 210 responders. Half of the physicians (50%) experienced SCTs as a WEP, and 11% found them as a WEP to a great extent. The proportion of physicians experiencing certification tasks as a WEP varied with the type of clinic and were highest in general practice (73%), orthopaedics (68%), rheumatology (67%), neurology (59%) and psychiatry (58%). Using internal medicine as a reference group, the PRs for finding SCTs as a WEP to a great extent were 4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09) in general practice, 2.67 (2.05-3.47) in psychiatry and 2.66 (2.04-3.47) in orthopaedics, after adjusting for educational level and frequency of sickness certification consultations. In ear, nose and throat clinics, the PR was 0.43 (0.21-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underline the importance of measures to improve the work situation for physicians regarding sickness certification practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"23-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs080","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sickness certification of patients--a work environment problem among physicians?\",\"authors\":\"T Ljungquist,&nbsp;E Hinas,&nbsp;B Arrelöv,&nbsp;C Lindholm,&nbsp;A L Wilteus,&nbsp;G H Nilsson,&nbsp;K Alexanderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqs080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to several studies, physicians find sickness certification of patients to be problematic, and some smaller studies suggest that this is a psychosocial work environment problem (WEP).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore to what extent physicians experience sickness certification as a WEP and the associations of this with the type of clinic and other workplace factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses of data from a questionnaire sent to all physicians who were living and working in Sweden. The study group consisted of physicians aged <65 years who performed sickness certification tasks (SCTs). Prevalence rates (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of finding SCTs as a WEP in relation to background factors were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 61%. The final study group consisted of 14 210 responders. Half of the physicians (50%) experienced SCTs as a WEP, and 11% found them as a WEP to a great extent. The proportion of physicians experiencing certification tasks as a WEP varied with the type of clinic and were highest in general practice (73%), orthopaedics (68%), rheumatology (67%), neurology (59%) and psychiatry (58%). Using internal medicine as a reference group, the PRs for finding SCTs as a WEP to a great extent were 4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09) in general practice, 2.67 (2.05-3.47) in psychiatry and 2.66 (2.04-3.47) in orthopaedics, after adjusting for educational level and frequency of sickness certification consultations. In ear, nose and throat clinics, the PR was 0.43 (0.21-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underline the importance of measures to improve the work situation for physicians regarding sickness certification practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs080\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景:根据一些研究,医生发现病人的疾病证明是有问题的,一些较小的研究表明这是一个社会心理工作环境问题(WEP)。目的:探讨在何种程度上医生经历疾病证明作为一个WEP和这与类型的诊所和其他工作场所因素的关联。方法:对发给所有在瑞典生活和工作的医生的问卷数据进行分析。研究组由年龄较大的医师组成结果:有效率为61%。最后的研究组由14210名应答者组成。一半的医生(50%)认为sct是WEP, 11%的医生认为sct在很大程度上是WEP。作为WEP经历认证任务的医生比例因诊所类型而异,最高的是全科(73%)、骨科(68%)、风湿病学(67%)、神经病学(59%)和精神病学(58%)。以内科作为参照组,在调整教育水平和疾病证明咨询频率后,发现sct作为WEP的pr在很大程度上为全科4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09),精神病学2.67(2.05-3.47)和骨科2.66(2.04-3.47)。耳、鼻、喉门诊的PR为0.43(0.21 ~ 0.88)。结论:研究结果强调措施的重要性,以改善工作情况的医生有关疾病证明的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sickness certification of patients--a work environment problem among physicians?

Background: According to several studies, physicians find sickness certification of patients to be problematic, and some smaller studies suggest that this is a psychosocial work environment problem (WEP).

Aims: To explore to what extent physicians experience sickness certification as a WEP and the associations of this with the type of clinic and other workplace factors.

Methods: Analyses of data from a questionnaire sent to all physicians who were living and working in Sweden. The study group consisted of physicians aged <65 years who performed sickness certification tasks (SCTs). Prevalence rates (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of finding SCTs as a WEP in relation to background factors were calculated.

Results: The response rate was 61%. The final study group consisted of 14 210 responders. Half of the physicians (50%) experienced SCTs as a WEP, and 11% found them as a WEP to a great extent. The proportion of physicians experiencing certification tasks as a WEP varied with the type of clinic and were highest in general practice (73%), orthopaedics (68%), rheumatology (67%), neurology (59%) and psychiatry (58%). Using internal medicine as a reference group, the PRs for finding SCTs as a WEP to a great extent were 4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09) in general practice, 2.67 (2.05-3.47) in psychiatry and 2.66 (2.04-3.47) in orthopaedics, after adjusting for educational level and frequency of sickness certification consultations. In ear, nose and throat clinics, the PR was 0.43 (0.21-0.88).

Conclusions: The findings underline the importance of measures to improve the work situation for physicians regarding sickness certification practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信