T Ljungquist, E Hinas, B Arrelöv, C Lindholm, A L Wilteus, G H Nilsson, K Alexanderson
{"title":"病人患病证明——医生的工作环境问题?","authors":"T Ljungquist, E Hinas, B Arrelöv, C Lindholm, A L Wilteus, G H Nilsson, K Alexanderson","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqs080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to several studies, physicians find sickness certification of patients to be problematic, and some smaller studies suggest that this is a psychosocial work environment problem (WEP).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore to what extent physicians experience sickness certification as a WEP and the associations of this with the type of clinic and other workplace factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses of data from a questionnaire sent to all physicians who were living and working in Sweden. The study group consisted of physicians aged <65 years who performed sickness certification tasks (SCTs). Prevalence rates (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of finding SCTs as a WEP in relation to background factors were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 61%. The final study group consisted of 14 210 responders. Half of the physicians (50%) experienced SCTs as a WEP, and 11% found them as a WEP to a great extent. The proportion of physicians experiencing certification tasks as a WEP varied with the type of clinic and were highest in general practice (73%), orthopaedics (68%), rheumatology (67%), neurology (59%) and psychiatry (58%). Using internal medicine as a reference group, the PRs for finding SCTs as a WEP to a great extent were 4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09) in general practice, 2.67 (2.05-3.47) in psychiatry and 2.66 (2.04-3.47) in orthopaedics, after adjusting for educational level and frequency of sickness certification consultations. In ear, nose and throat clinics, the PR was 0.43 (0.21-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underline the importance of measures to improve the work situation for physicians regarding sickness certification practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"23-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs080","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sickness certification of patients--a work environment problem among physicians?\",\"authors\":\"T Ljungquist, E Hinas, B Arrelöv, C Lindholm, A L Wilteus, G H Nilsson, K Alexanderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqs080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to several studies, physicians find sickness certification of patients to be problematic, and some smaller studies suggest that this is a psychosocial work environment problem (WEP).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore to what extent physicians experience sickness certification as a WEP and the associations of this with the type of clinic and other workplace factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses of data from a questionnaire sent to all physicians who were living and working in Sweden. The study group consisted of physicians aged <65 years who performed sickness certification tasks (SCTs). Prevalence rates (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of finding SCTs as a WEP in relation to background factors were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 61%. The final study group consisted of 14 210 responders. Half of the physicians (50%) experienced SCTs as a WEP, and 11% found them as a WEP to a great extent. The proportion of physicians experiencing certification tasks as a WEP varied with the type of clinic and were highest in general practice (73%), orthopaedics (68%), rheumatology (67%), neurology (59%) and psychiatry (58%). Using internal medicine as a reference group, the PRs for finding SCTs as a WEP to a great extent were 4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09) in general practice, 2.67 (2.05-3.47) in psychiatry and 2.66 (2.04-3.47) in orthopaedics, after adjusting for educational level and frequency of sickness certification consultations. In ear, nose and throat clinics, the PR was 0.43 (0.21-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underline the importance of measures to improve the work situation for physicians regarding sickness certification practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs080\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
摘要
背景:根据一些研究,医生发现病人的疾病证明是有问题的,一些较小的研究表明这是一个社会心理工作环境问题(WEP)。目的:探讨在何种程度上医生经历疾病证明作为一个WEP和这与类型的诊所和其他工作场所因素的关联。方法:对发给所有在瑞典生活和工作的医生的问卷数据进行分析。研究组由年龄较大的医师组成结果:有效率为61%。最后的研究组由14210名应答者组成。一半的医生(50%)认为sct是WEP, 11%的医生认为sct在很大程度上是WEP。作为WEP经历认证任务的医生比例因诊所类型而异,最高的是全科(73%)、骨科(68%)、风湿病学(67%)、神经病学(59%)和精神病学(58%)。以内科作为参照组,在调整教育水平和疾病证明咨询频率后,发现sct作为WEP的pr在很大程度上为全科4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09),精神病学2.67(2.05-3.47)和骨科2.66(2.04-3.47)。耳、鼻、喉门诊的PR为0.43(0.21 ~ 0.88)。结论:研究结果强调措施的重要性,以改善工作情况的医生有关疾病证明的做法。
Sickness certification of patients--a work environment problem among physicians?
Background: According to several studies, physicians find sickness certification of patients to be problematic, and some smaller studies suggest that this is a psychosocial work environment problem (WEP).
Aims: To explore to what extent physicians experience sickness certification as a WEP and the associations of this with the type of clinic and other workplace factors.
Methods: Analyses of data from a questionnaire sent to all physicians who were living and working in Sweden. The study group consisted of physicians aged <65 years who performed sickness certification tasks (SCTs). Prevalence rates (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of finding SCTs as a WEP in relation to background factors were calculated.
Results: The response rate was 61%. The final study group consisted of 14 210 responders. Half of the physicians (50%) experienced SCTs as a WEP, and 11% found them as a WEP to a great extent. The proportion of physicians experiencing certification tasks as a WEP varied with the type of clinic and were highest in general practice (73%), orthopaedics (68%), rheumatology (67%), neurology (59%) and psychiatry (58%). Using internal medicine as a reference group, the PRs for finding SCTs as a WEP to a great extent were 4.05 (95% CI 3.23-5.09) in general practice, 2.67 (2.05-3.47) in psychiatry and 2.66 (2.04-3.47) in orthopaedics, after adjusting for educational level and frequency of sickness certification consultations. In ear, nose and throat clinics, the PR was 0.43 (0.21-0.88).
Conclusions: The findings underline the importance of measures to improve the work situation for physicians regarding sickness certification practices.