术中白色试验检测胆漏的评价。

Kawin Leelawat, Kittipong Chaiyabutr, Somboon Subwongcharoen, Sa-Ad Treepongkaruna
{"title":"术中白色试验检测胆漏的评价。","authors":"Kawin Leelawat,&nbsp;Kittipong Chaiyabutr,&nbsp;Somboon Subwongcharoen,&nbsp;Sa-Ad Treepongkaruna","doi":"10.1155/2012/425435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We assess whether the White test is better than the conventional bile leakage test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage in hepatectomized patients. This study included 30 patients who received elective liver resection. Both the conventional bile leakage test (injecting an isotonic sodium chloride solution through the cystic duct) and the White test (injecting a fat emulsion solution through the cystic duct) were carried out in the same patients. The detection of bile leakage was compared between the conventional method and the White test. A bile leak was demonstrated in 8 patients (26.7%) by the conventional method and in 19 patients (63.3%) by the White test. In addition, the White test detected a significantly higher number of bile leakage sites compared with the conventional method (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P < 0.001). The White test is better than the conventional test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage. Based on our study, we recommend that surgeons investigating bile leakage sites during liver resections should use the White test instead of the conventional bile leakage test.</p>","PeriodicalId":77165,"journal":{"name":"HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery","volume":" ","pages":"425435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/425435","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the white test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage.\",\"authors\":\"Kawin Leelawat,&nbsp;Kittipong Chaiyabutr,&nbsp;Somboon Subwongcharoen,&nbsp;Sa-Ad Treepongkaruna\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2012/425435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We assess whether the White test is better than the conventional bile leakage test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage in hepatectomized patients. This study included 30 patients who received elective liver resection. Both the conventional bile leakage test (injecting an isotonic sodium chloride solution through the cystic duct) and the White test (injecting a fat emulsion solution through the cystic duct) were carried out in the same patients. The detection of bile leakage was compared between the conventional method and the White test. A bile leak was demonstrated in 8 patients (26.7%) by the conventional method and in 19 patients (63.3%) by the White test. In addition, the White test detected a significantly higher number of bile leakage sites compared with the conventional method (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P < 0.001). The White test is better than the conventional test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage. Based on our study, we recommend that surgeons investigating bile leakage sites during liver resections should use the White test instead of the conventional bile leakage test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"425435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/425435\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/425435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/425435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们评估White试验是否优于传统的胆漏试验用于肝切除术患者术中胆漏的检测。本研究包括30例接受择期肝切除术的患者。常规胆漏试验(经胆囊管注射等渗氯化钠溶液)和White试验(经胆囊管注射脂肪乳溶液)均在同一患者中进行。比较了常规方法与怀特试验对胆漏的检测效果。常规胆漏8例(26.7%),白氏试验19例(63.3%)。此外,与传统方法相比,White试验检测到的胆汁泄漏部位数量显著增加(Wilcoxon sign -rank检验;P < 0.001)。术中胆漏的检测怀特试验优于常规试验。根据我们的研究,我们建议外科医生在肝切除术中调查胆漏部位时应使用White试验而不是传统的胆漏试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the white test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage.

We assess whether the White test is better than the conventional bile leakage test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage in hepatectomized patients. This study included 30 patients who received elective liver resection. Both the conventional bile leakage test (injecting an isotonic sodium chloride solution through the cystic duct) and the White test (injecting a fat emulsion solution through the cystic duct) were carried out in the same patients. The detection of bile leakage was compared between the conventional method and the White test. A bile leak was demonstrated in 8 patients (26.7%) by the conventional method and in 19 patients (63.3%) by the White test. In addition, the White test detected a significantly higher number of bile leakage sites compared with the conventional method (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; P < 0.001). The White test is better than the conventional test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage. Based on our study, we recommend that surgeons investigating bile leakage sites during liver resections should use the White test instead of the conventional bile leakage test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信