Domenico Galzerano, Sara Di Michele, Giuseppe Paolisso, Bernardino Tuccillo, Diana Lama, Sabino Carbotta, Antonio Cittadini, Michele Adolfo Tedesco, Carlo Gaudio
{"title":"替米沙坦与卡维地洛预防高血压患者房颤复发的多中心随机研究","authors":"Domenico Galzerano, Sara Di Michele, Giuseppe Paolisso, Bernardino Tuccillo, Diana Lama, Sabino Carbotta, Antonio Cittadini, Michele Adolfo Tedesco, Carlo Gaudio","doi":"10.1177/1470320312443909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial remodelling, leading to atrial fibrillation (AF), is mediated by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mild hypertensive outpatients (systolic/diastolic blood pressure 140-159/90-99 mmHg) in sinus rhythm who had experienced ≥ 1 electrocardiogram (ECG)-documented AF episode in the previous six months received randomly telmisartan 80 mg/day or carvedilol 25 mg/day. Blood pressure and 24-hour ECG were monitored monthly for one year; patients were asked to report symptomatic AF episodes and to undergo an ECG as early as possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-two patients completed the study (telmisartan, n=70; carvedilol, n=62). Significantly fewer AF episodes were reported with telmisartan versus carvedilol (14.3% vs. 37.1%; p<0.003). Left atrial diameter, assessed by echocardiography, was similar with telmisartan and carvedilol (3.4±2.3 cm vs. 3.6±2.4 cm). At study end, both regimes significantly reduced mean left ventricular mass index, but the reduction obtained with telmisartan was significantly greater than with carvedilol (117.8±10.7 vs. 124.7±14.5; p<0.0001). Mean blood pressure values were not significantly different between the groups (telmisartan 154/97 to 123/75 mmHg; p<0.001; carvedilol 153/94 to 125/78 mmHg; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telmisartan was significantly more effective than carvedilol in preventing recurrent AF episodes in hypertensive AF patients, despite a similar lowering of blood pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":520698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS","volume":" ","pages":"496-503"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1470320312443909","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicentre, randomized study of telmisartan versus carvedilol for prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive patients.\",\"authors\":\"Domenico Galzerano, Sara Di Michele, Giuseppe Paolisso, Bernardino Tuccillo, Diana Lama, Sabino Carbotta, Antonio Cittadini, Michele Adolfo Tedesco, Carlo Gaudio\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1470320312443909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial remodelling, leading to atrial fibrillation (AF), is mediated by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mild hypertensive outpatients (systolic/diastolic blood pressure 140-159/90-99 mmHg) in sinus rhythm who had experienced ≥ 1 electrocardiogram (ECG)-documented AF episode in the previous six months received randomly telmisartan 80 mg/day or carvedilol 25 mg/day. Blood pressure and 24-hour ECG were monitored monthly for one year; patients were asked to report symptomatic AF episodes and to undergo an ECG as early as possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-two patients completed the study (telmisartan, n=70; carvedilol, n=62). Significantly fewer AF episodes were reported with telmisartan versus carvedilol (14.3% vs. 37.1%; p<0.003). Left atrial diameter, assessed by echocardiography, was similar with telmisartan and carvedilol (3.4±2.3 cm vs. 3.6±2.4 cm). At study end, both regimes significantly reduced mean left ventricular mass index, but the reduction obtained with telmisartan was significantly greater than with carvedilol (117.8±10.7 vs. 124.7±14.5; p<0.0001). Mean blood pressure values were not significantly different between the groups (telmisartan 154/97 to 123/75 mmHg; p<0.001; carvedilol 153/94 to 125/78 mmHg; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telmisartan was significantly more effective than carvedilol in preventing recurrent AF episodes in hypertensive AF patients, despite a similar lowering of blood pressure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"496-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1470320312443909\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320312443909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320312443909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
摘要
心房重构导致心房颤动(AF)是由肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统介导的。方法:有窦性心律的轻度高血压门诊患者(收缩压/舒张压140-159/90-99 mmHg),前6个月有≥1次心电图记录的房颤发作,随机给予替米沙坦80 mg/天或卡维地洛25 mg/天。每月监测血压和24小时心电图1年;要求患者报告有症状的房颤发作,并尽早进行心电图检查。结果:132例患者完成了研究(替米沙坦,n=70;卡维地洛,n = 62)。替米沙坦组与卡维地洛组相比,AF发作明显减少(14.3% vs 37.1%;结论:替米沙坦在预防高血压房颤患者房颤复发方面明显优于卡维地洛,尽管血压降低相似。
A multicentre, randomized study of telmisartan versus carvedilol for prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive patients.
Introduction: Atrial remodelling, leading to atrial fibrillation (AF), is mediated by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
Methods: Mild hypertensive outpatients (systolic/diastolic blood pressure 140-159/90-99 mmHg) in sinus rhythm who had experienced ≥ 1 electrocardiogram (ECG)-documented AF episode in the previous six months received randomly telmisartan 80 mg/day or carvedilol 25 mg/day. Blood pressure and 24-hour ECG were monitored monthly for one year; patients were asked to report symptomatic AF episodes and to undergo an ECG as early as possible.
Results: One hundred and thirty-two patients completed the study (telmisartan, n=70; carvedilol, n=62). Significantly fewer AF episodes were reported with telmisartan versus carvedilol (14.3% vs. 37.1%; p<0.003). Left atrial diameter, assessed by echocardiography, was similar with telmisartan and carvedilol (3.4±2.3 cm vs. 3.6±2.4 cm). At study end, both regimes significantly reduced mean left ventricular mass index, but the reduction obtained with telmisartan was significantly greater than with carvedilol (117.8±10.7 vs. 124.7±14.5; p<0.0001). Mean blood pressure values were not significantly different between the groups (telmisartan 154/97 to 123/75 mmHg; p<0.001; carvedilol 153/94 to 125/78 mmHg; p<0.001).
Conclusions: Telmisartan was significantly more effective than carvedilol in preventing recurrent AF episodes in hypertensive AF patients, despite a similar lowering of blood pressure.