因适应障碍而长期生病缺勤。

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) Pub Date : 2012-07-01 Epub Date: 2012-04-27 DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqs043
C Catalina-Romero, J I Pastrana-Jiménez, M J Tenas-López, P Martínez-Muñoz, M Ruiz-Moraga, C Fernández-Labandera, E Calvo-Bonacho
{"title":"因适应障碍而长期生病缺勤。","authors":"C Catalina-Romero,&nbsp;J I Pastrana-Jiménez,&nbsp;M J Tenas-López,&nbsp;P Martínez-Muñoz,&nbsp;M Ruiz-Moraga,&nbsp;C Fernández-Labandera,&nbsp;E Calvo-Bonacho","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqs043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although adjustment disorder is frequently reported in clinical settings, scientific evidence is scarce regarding its impact on sickness absence and the variables associated with sickness absence duration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To report sickness absence duration and to identify predictors of long-term sickness absence in patients with adjustment disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, prospective study included subjects with non-work-related sickness absence (>15 days) after a diagnosis of adjustment disorder. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the best predictors of long-term sickness absence (≥ 6 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1182 subjects in the final analysis. The median duration of sickness absence due to adjustment disorder was 91 days. Twenty-two per cent of the subjects reported long-term sickness absence. After multivariate analysis, comorbidity (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.43-3.49), age (25-34 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.27-6.07; 35-44 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 3.70, 95% CI 1.71-7.99; 45-54 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 3.58, 95% CI 1.60-8.02; ≥ 55 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 6.35, 95% CI 2.64-15.31) and occupational level (blue collar versus white collar: OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.10-2.09) remained significantly associated with long-term sickness absence. Comorbidity was the strongest predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible to predict long-term sickness absence due to adjustment disorder on the basis of demographic, work-related and clinical information available during the basic assessment of the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"375-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs043","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term sickness absence due to adjustment disorder.\",\"authors\":\"C Catalina-Romero,&nbsp;J I Pastrana-Jiménez,&nbsp;M J Tenas-López,&nbsp;P Martínez-Muñoz,&nbsp;M Ruiz-Moraga,&nbsp;C Fernández-Labandera,&nbsp;E Calvo-Bonacho\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqs043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although adjustment disorder is frequently reported in clinical settings, scientific evidence is scarce regarding its impact on sickness absence and the variables associated with sickness absence duration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To report sickness absence duration and to identify predictors of long-term sickness absence in patients with adjustment disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational, prospective study included subjects with non-work-related sickness absence (>15 days) after a diagnosis of adjustment disorder. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the best predictors of long-term sickness absence (≥ 6 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1182 subjects in the final analysis. The median duration of sickness absence due to adjustment disorder was 91 days. Twenty-two per cent of the subjects reported long-term sickness absence. After multivariate analysis, comorbidity (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.43-3.49), age (25-34 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.27-6.07; 35-44 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 3.70, 95% CI 1.71-7.99; 45-54 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 3.58, 95% CI 1.60-8.02; ≥ 55 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 6.35, 95% CI 2.64-15.31) and occupational level (blue collar versus white collar: OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.10-2.09) remained significantly associated with long-term sickness absence. Comorbidity was the strongest predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible to predict long-term sickness absence due to adjustment disorder on the basis of demographic, work-related and clinical information available during the basic assessment of the patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"375-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs043\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景:虽然适应障碍在临床环境中经常被报道,但关于其对缺勤的影响以及与缺勤时间相关的变量的科学证据很少。目的:报告疾病缺勤时间,并确定适应障碍患者长期缺勤的预测因素。方法:本观察性前瞻性研究纳入了诊断为适应障碍后与工作无关的疾病缺勤(>15天)的受试者。采用逐步logistic回归分析确定长期病假(≥6个月)的最佳预测因子。结果:共纳入1182例受试者。因适应障碍而缺勤的中位时间为91天。22%的研究对象报告长期因病缺勤。多因素分析后,共病(OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.43-3.49)、年龄(25-34岁)与结论:根据患者基本评估期间可获得的人口统计学、工作相关和临床信息,可以预测由于适应障碍导致的长期缺勤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term sickness absence due to adjustment disorder.

Background: Although adjustment disorder is frequently reported in clinical settings, scientific evidence is scarce regarding its impact on sickness absence and the variables associated with sickness absence duration.

Aims: To report sickness absence duration and to identify predictors of long-term sickness absence in patients with adjustment disorder.

Methods: This observational, prospective study included subjects with non-work-related sickness absence (>15 days) after a diagnosis of adjustment disorder. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the best predictors of long-term sickness absence (≥ 6 months).

Results: There were 1182 subjects in the final analysis. The median duration of sickness absence due to adjustment disorder was 91 days. Twenty-two per cent of the subjects reported long-term sickness absence. After multivariate analysis, comorbidity (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.43-3.49), age (25-34 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.27-6.07; 35-44 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 3.70, 95% CI 1.71-7.99; 45-54 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 3.58, 95% CI 1.60-8.02; ≥ 55 years old versus <25 years old: OR = 6.35, 95% CI 2.64-15.31) and occupational level (blue collar versus white collar: OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.10-2.09) remained significantly associated with long-term sickness absence. Comorbidity was the strongest predictor.

Conclusions: It is possible to predict long-term sickness absence due to adjustment disorder on the basis of demographic, work-related and clinical information available during the basic assessment of the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信