最近关于限制医疗保险覆盖范围和修改医疗保险费用分摊的提案。

Kathryn Linehan
{"title":"最近关于限制医疗保险覆盖范围和修改医疗保险费用分摊的提案。","authors":"Kathryn Linehan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As policymakers look for savings from the Medicare program, some have proposed eliminating or discouraging \"first-dollar coverage\" available through privately purchased Medigap policies. Medigap coverage, which beneficiaries obtain to protect themselves from Medicare's cost-sharing requirements and its lack of a cap on out-of-pocket spending, may discourage the judicious use of medical services by reducing or eliminating beneficiary cost sharing. It is estimated that eliminating such coverage, which has been shown to be associated with higher Medicare spending, and requiring some cost sharing would encourage beneficiaries to reduce their service use and thus reduce pro­gram spending. However, eliminating first-dollar coverage could cause some beneficiaries to incur higher spending or forego necessary services. Some policy proposals to eliminate first-dollar coverage would also modify Medicare's cost sharing and add an out-of-pocket spending cap for fee-for-service Medicare. This paper discusses Medicare's current cost-sharing requirements, Medigap insurance, and proposals to modify Medicare's cost sharing and eliminate first-dollar coverage in Medigap plans. It reviews the evidence on the effects of first-dollar coverage on spending, some objections to eliminating first-dollar coverage, and results of research that has modeled the impact of eliminating first-dollar coverage, modifying Medicare's cost-sharing requirements, and adding an out-of-pocket limit on beneficiaries' spending.</p>","PeriodicalId":87188,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)","volume":" 845","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent proposals to limit Medigap coverage and modify Medicare cost sharing.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Linehan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As policymakers look for savings from the Medicare program, some have proposed eliminating or discouraging \\\"first-dollar coverage\\\" available through privately purchased Medigap policies. Medigap coverage, which beneficiaries obtain to protect themselves from Medicare's cost-sharing requirements and its lack of a cap on out-of-pocket spending, may discourage the judicious use of medical services by reducing or eliminating beneficiary cost sharing. It is estimated that eliminating such coverage, which has been shown to be associated with higher Medicare spending, and requiring some cost sharing would encourage beneficiaries to reduce their service use and thus reduce pro­gram spending. However, eliminating first-dollar coverage could cause some beneficiaries to incur higher spending or forego necessary services. Some policy proposals to eliminate first-dollar coverage would also modify Medicare's cost sharing and add an out-of-pocket spending cap for fee-for-service Medicare. This paper discusses Medicare's current cost-sharing requirements, Medigap insurance, and proposals to modify Medicare's cost sharing and eliminate first-dollar coverage in Medigap plans. It reviews the evidence on the effects of first-dollar coverage on spending, some objections to eliminating first-dollar coverage, and results of research that has modeled the impact of eliminating first-dollar coverage, modifying Medicare's cost-sharing requirements, and adding an out-of-pocket limit on beneficiaries' spending.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)\",\"volume\":\" 845\",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于政策制定者希望从医疗保险计划中节省开支,一些人提议取消或阻止通过私人购买的医疗保险计划提供的“第一美元保险”。医疗保险覆盖范围是受益人获得的,以保护自己免受医疗保险的费用分摊要求的影响,而且医疗保险对自付费用没有上限,这可能会减少或取消受益人的费用分摊,从而阻碍明智地使用医疗服务。据估计,取消这样的覆盖范围,这已被证明与更高的医疗保险支出有关,并要求一些成本分担,将鼓励受益人减少他们的服务使用,从而减少项目支出。但是,取消第一美元保险可能会导致一些受益人产生更高的支出或放弃必要的服务。一些取消第一美元保险的政策建议还将修改医疗保险的成本分担,并为按服务收费的医疗保险增加自付支出上限。本文讨论了医疗保险目前的费用分摊要求,医疗保险计划,以及修改医疗保险的费用分摊和取消医疗保险计划中的第一美元保险的建议。它回顾了第一美元覆盖对支出影响的证据,一些反对取消第一美元覆盖的意见,以及对取消第一美元覆盖的影响进行建模的研究结果,修改医疗保险的成本分摊要求,并增加对受益人支出的自付限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent proposals to limit Medigap coverage and modify Medicare cost sharing.

As policymakers look for savings from the Medicare program, some have proposed eliminating or discouraging "first-dollar coverage" available through privately purchased Medigap policies. Medigap coverage, which beneficiaries obtain to protect themselves from Medicare's cost-sharing requirements and its lack of a cap on out-of-pocket spending, may discourage the judicious use of medical services by reducing or eliminating beneficiary cost sharing. It is estimated that eliminating such coverage, which has been shown to be associated with higher Medicare spending, and requiring some cost sharing would encourage beneficiaries to reduce their service use and thus reduce pro­gram spending. However, eliminating first-dollar coverage could cause some beneficiaries to incur higher spending or forego necessary services. Some policy proposals to eliminate first-dollar coverage would also modify Medicare's cost sharing and add an out-of-pocket spending cap for fee-for-service Medicare. This paper discusses Medicare's current cost-sharing requirements, Medigap insurance, and proposals to modify Medicare's cost sharing and eliminate first-dollar coverage in Medigap plans. It reviews the evidence on the effects of first-dollar coverage on spending, some objections to eliminating first-dollar coverage, and results of research that has modeled the impact of eliminating first-dollar coverage, modifying Medicare's cost-sharing requirements, and adding an out-of-pocket limit on beneficiaries' spending.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信