Aziz Nather, Wong Keng Lin, Zameer Aziz, Christine Hj Ong, Bernard Mc Feng, Clarabelle B Lin
{"title":"评估糖尿病足病患者的感觉神经病变。","authors":"Aziz Nather, Wong Keng Lin, Zameer Aziz, Christine Hj Ong, Bernard Mc Feng, Clarabelle B Lin","doi":"10.3402/dfa.v2i0.6367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of three different modalities for testing sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients with and without diabetic foot problems. The three devices used included the pin-prick testing using the Neurotip® (PPT), the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10 g monofilament testing (SWMT), and the rapid-current perception threshold (R-CPT) measurements using the Neurometer® testing. Our study population consisted of 54 patients (108 feet) with diabetic foot problems treated at the National University Hospital in Singapore by our multi-disciplinary diabetic foot care team. Our results showed no difference in sensory neuropathy detected by PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT in both the pathological and normal foot. In the pathological foot, there was significant increase in sensory neuropathy detected by the Neurometer® device at both the big toe and ankle sites as compared to PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT. In the normal foot, there was a significant increase in sensory neuropathy detected by the Neurometer® device at the big toe site only as compared to PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT. Finally, the Neurometer® measurements detected a statistically higher proportion of feet with sensory neuropathy as compared to detection by the PPT or 5.07/10 g SWMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":45385,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","volume":"2 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7f/bf/DFA-2-6367.PMC3284271.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetic foot problems.\",\"authors\":\"Aziz Nather, Wong Keng Lin, Zameer Aziz, Christine Hj Ong, Bernard Mc Feng, Clarabelle B Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3402/dfa.v2i0.6367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of three different modalities for testing sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients with and without diabetic foot problems. The three devices used included the pin-prick testing using the Neurotip® (PPT), the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10 g monofilament testing (SWMT), and the rapid-current perception threshold (R-CPT) measurements using the Neurometer® testing. Our study population consisted of 54 patients (108 feet) with diabetic foot problems treated at the National University Hospital in Singapore by our multi-disciplinary diabetic foot care team. Our results showed no difference in sensory neuropathy detected by PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT in both the pathological and normal foot. In the pathological foot, there was significant increase in sensory neuropathy detected by the Neurometer® device at both the big toe and ankle sites as compared to PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT. In the normal foot, there was a significant increase in sensory neuropathy detected by the Neurometer® device at the big toe site only as compared to PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT. Finally, the Neurometer® measurements detected a statistically higher proportion of feet with sensory neuropathy as compared to detection by the PPT or 5.07/10 g SWMT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Foot & Ankle\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7f/bf/DFA-2-6367.PMC3284271.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Foot & Ankle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v2i0.6367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v2i0.6367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们这项研究的目的是比较三种不同模式对有和没有糖尿病足问题的糖尿病患者进行感觉神经病变测试的准确性。使用的三种设备包括使用 Neurotip® (PPT) 进行的针刺测试、Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10 g 单丝测试 (SWMT) 和使用 Neurometer® 测试进行的快速电流感知阈值 (R-CPT) 测量。我们的研究对象包括在新加坡国立大学医院接受多学科糖尿病足护理团队治疗的 54 名糖尿病足患者(108 只脚)。我们的结果显示,在病足和正常足中,通过 PPT 和 5.07/10 g SWMT 检测到的感觉神经病变没有差异。与 PPT 和 5.07/10 g SWMT 相比,在病理足中,Neurometer® 设备在大脚趾和脚踝部位检测到的感觉神经病变明显增加。在正常足部,与 PPT 和 5.07/10 g SWMT 相比,Neurometer® 设备仅在大脚趾部位检测到感觉神经病变明显增加。最后,与使用 PPT 或 5.07/10 g SWMT 检测相比,Neurometer® 设备检测到的足部感觉神经病变比例在统计学上更高。
Assessment of sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetic foot problems.
Our aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of three different modalities for testing sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients with and without diabetic foot problems. The three devices used included the pin-prick testing using the Neurotip® (PPT), the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10 g monofilament testing (SWMT), and the rapid-current perception threshold (R-CPT) measurements using the Neurometer® testing. Our study population consisted of 54 patients (108 feet) with diabetic foot problems treated at the National University Hospital in Singapore by our multi-disciplinary diabetic foot care team. Our results showed no difference in sensory neuropathy detected by PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT in both the pathological and normal foot. In the pathological foot, there was significant increase in sensory neuropathy detected by the Neurometer® device at both the big toe and ankle sites as compared to PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT. In the normal foot, there was a significant increase in sensory neuropathy detected by the Neurometer® device at the big toe site only as compared to PPT and 5.07/10 g SWMT. Finally, the Neurometer® measurements detected a statistically higher proportion of feet with sensory neuropathy as compared to detection by the PPT or 5.07/10 g SWMT.