在31个欧洲国家暴露于社会心理工作因素。

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) Pub Date : 2012-04-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-06 DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqs020
I Niedhammer, H Sultan-Taïeb, J-F Chastang, G Vermeylen, A Parent-Thirion
{"title":"在31个欧洲国家暴露于社会心理工作因素。","authors":"I Niedhammer,&nbsp;H Sultan-Taïeb,&nbsp;J-F Chastang,&nbsp;G Vermeylen,&nbsp;A Parent-Thirion","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqs020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although psychosocial work factors are recognized as major occupational risk factors, little information is available regarding the prevalence of exposure to these factors and the differences in exposure between countries.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the differences in various psychosocial work exposures between 31 European countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was based on a sample of 14,881 male and 14,799 female workers from the 2005 European Working Conditions Survey. Eighteen psychosocial work factors were studied: low decision latitude (skill discretion and decision authority), high psychological demands, job strain, low social support, iso-strain, physical violence, sexual harassment, bullying, discrimination, work-family imbalance, long working hours, high effort, job insecurity, low job promotion, low reward and effort-reward imbalance. Covariates were age, number of workers in household, occupation, economic activity, self-employed/employee, public/private sector and part/full time work. Statistical analysis was performed using multilevel logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in all psychosocial work factors were observed between countries. The rank of the countries varied according to the exposure considered. However, some countries, especially Denmark, Netherlands and Norway, displayed a significantly lower prevalence of exposure to four factors or more, while some Southern and Eastern countries, especially Czech Republic, Greece, Lithuania and Turkey, had a higher prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in psychosocial work exposures were found between countries. This study is the first to compare a large set of psychosocial work exposures between 31 European countries. These findings may be useful to guide prevention policies at European level.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"196-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs020","citationCount":"82","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposure to psychosocial work factors in 31 European countries.\",\"authors\":\"I Niedhammer,&nbsp;H Sultan-Taïeb,&nbsp;J-F Chastang,&nbsp;G Vermeylen,&nbsp;A Parent-Thirion\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqs020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although psychosocial work factors are recognized as major occupational risk factors, little information is available regarding the prevalence of exposure to these factors and the differences in exposure between countries.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the differences in various psychosocial work exposures between 31 European countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was based on a sample of 14,881 male and 14,799 female workers from the 2005 European Working Conditions Survey. Eighteen psychosocial work factors were studied: low decision latitude (skill discretion and decision authority), high psychological demands, job strain, low social support, iso-strain, physical violence, sexual harassment, bullying, discrimination, work-family imbalance, long working hours, high effort, job insecurity, low job promotion, low reward and effort-reward imbalance. Covariates were age, number of workers in household, occupation, economic activity, self-employed/employee, public/private sector and part/full time work. Statistical analysis was performed using multilevel logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in all psychosocial work factors were observed between countries. The rank of the countries varied according to the exposure considered. However, some countries, especially Denmark, Netherlands and Norway, displayed a significantly lower prevalence of exposure to four factors or more, while some Southern and Eastern countries, especially Czech Republic, Greece, Lithuania and Turkey, had a higher prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in psychosocial work exposures were found between countries. This study is the first to compare a large set of psychosocial work exposures between 31 European countries. These findings may be useful to guide prevention policies at European level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"196-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqs020\",\"citationCount\":\"82\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

摘要

背景:虽然社会心理工作因素被认为是主要的职业风险因素,但关于这些因素暴露的流行程度和国家之间暴露的差异的信息很少。目的:探讨31个欧洲国家在各种社会心理工作暴露方面的差异。方法:该研究基于2005年欧洲工作条件调查的14881名男性和14799名女性员工的样本。研究了18个工作心理因素:低决策纬度(技能自由裁量权和决策权)、高心理要求、工作压力、低社会支持、等压力、身体暴力、性骚扰、欺凌、歧视、工作与家庭不平衡、长工作时间、高努力、工作不安全感、低晋升、低回报和努力与回报不平衡。协变量包括年龄、家庭工人人数、职业、经济活动、自雇/雇员、公共/私营部门和兼职/全职工作。采用多水平logistic回归分析进行统计分析。结果:各国家在所有社会心理工作因素上存在显著差异。这些国家的排名根据所考虑的暴露程度而有所不同。然而,一些国家,特别是丹麦、荷兰和挪威,暴露于四种或更多因素的患病率明显较低,而一些南部和东部国家,特别是捷克共和国、希腊、立陶宛和土耳其,患病率较高。结论:社会心理工作暴露在不同国家之间存在差异。这项研究首次对31个欧洲国家的大量社会心理工作进行了比较。这些发现可能有助于指导欧洲一级的预防政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exposure to psychosocial work factors in 31 European countries.

Background: Although psychosocial work factors are recognized as major occupational risk factors, little information is available regarding the prevalence of exposure to these factors and the differences in exposure between countries.

Aims: To explore the differences in various psychosocial work exposures between 31 European countries.

Methods: The study was based on a sample of 14,881 male and 14,799 female workers from the 2005 European Working Conditions Survey. Eighteen psychosocial work factors were studied: low decision latitude (skill discretion and decision authority), high psychological demands, job strain, low social support, iso-strain, physical violence, sexual harassment, bullying, discrimination, work-family imbalance, long working hours, high effort, job insecurity, low job promotion, low reward and effort-reward imbalance. Covariates were age, number of workers in household, occupation, economic activity, self-employed/employee, public/private sector and part/full time work. Statistical analysis was performed using multilevel logistic regression analysis.

Results: Significant differences in all psychosocial work factors were observed between countries. The rank of the countries varied according to the exposure considered. However, some countries, especially Denmark, Netherlands and Norway, displayed a significantly lower prevalence of exposure to four factors or more, while some Southern and Eastern countries, especially Czech Republic, Greece, Lithuania and Turkey, had a higher prevalence.

Conclusions: Differences in psychosocial work exposures were found between countries. This study is the first to compare a large set of psychosocial work exposures between 31 European countries. These findings may be useful to guide prevention policies at European level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信