芬太尼果胶鼻喷雾剂与硫酸吗啡速释片治疗突破性癌痛的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、对照、双盲、双虚拟的多交叉研究。

Marie Fallon, Carlo Reale, Andrew Davies, A Eberhard Lux, Kirushna Kumar, Andrzej Stachowiak, Rafael Galvez
{"title":"芬太尼果胶鼻喷雾剂与硫酸吗啡速释片治疗突破性癌痛的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、对照、双盲、双虚拟的多交叉研究。","authors":"Marie Fallon,&nbsp;Carlo Reale,&nbsp;Andrew Davies,&nbsp;A Eberhard Lux,&nbsp;Kirushna Kumar,&nbsp;Andrzej Stachowiak,&nbsp;Rafael Galvez","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2011.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immediate-release morphine sulfate (IRMS) remains the standard treatment for breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP), but its onset of effect does not match the rapid onset and short duration of most BTCP episodes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study will evaluate the efficacy/tolerability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) compared with IRMS for BTCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 110) experiencing one to four BTCP episodes/day while taking ≥ 60 mg/day oral morphine (or equivalent) for background cancer pain entered a double-blind, double-dummy (DB/DD), multiple-crossover study. Patients completing a titration phase (n = 84) continued to a DB/DD phase: 10 episodes of BTCP were randomly treated with FPNS and oral capsule placebo (five episodes) or IRMS and nasal spray placebo (5 episodes). The primary end point was pain intensity (P < .05 FPNS vs. IRMS) difference from baseline at 15 minutes (PID(15)). Secondary end points were onset of pain intensity (PI) decrease (≥ 1-point) and time to clinically meaningful pain relief (CMPR, ≥ 2-point PI decrease). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by adverse events (AEs) and nasal assessments. By-patient and by-episode analyses were completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with IRMS, FPNS significantly improved mean PID(15) scores. 57.5% of FPNS-treated episodes significantly demonstrated onset of PI improvement by 5 minutes and 95.7% by 30 minutes. CMPR (≥ 2-point PI decrease) was seen in 52.4% of episodes by 10 minutes. Only 4.7% of patients withdrew from titration (2.4% in DB/DD phase) because of AEs; no significant nasal effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FPNS was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of BTCP and provided faster onset of analgesia and attainment of CMPR than IRMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":" ","pages":"224-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.07.004","citationCount":"75","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of fentanyl pectin nasal spray compared with immediate-release morphine sulfate tablets in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy multiple-crossover study.\",\"authors\":\"Marie Fallon,&nbsp;Carlo Reale,&nbsp;Andrew Davies,&nbsp;A Eberhard Lux,&nbsp;Kirushna Kumar,&nbsp;Andrzej Stachowiak,&nbsp;Rafael Galvez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suponc.2011.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immediate-release morphine sulfate (IRMS) remains the standard treatment for breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP), but its onset of effect does not match the rapid onset and short duration of most BTCP episodes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study will evaluate the efficacy/tolerability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) compared with IRMS for BTCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 110) experiencing one to four BTCP episodes/day while taking ≥ 60 mg/day oral morphine (or equivalent) for background cancer pain entered a double-blind, double-dummy (DB/DD), multiple-crossover study. Patients completing a titration phase (n = 84) continued to a DB/DD phase: 10 episodes of BTCP were randomly treated with FPNS and oral capsule placebo (five episodes) or IRMS and nasal spray placebo (5 episodes). The primary end point was pain intensity (P < .05 FPNS vs. IRMS) difference from baseline at 15 minutes (PID(15)). Secondary end points were onset of pain intensity (PI) decrease (≥ 1-point) and time to clinically meaningful pain relief (CMPR, ≥ 2-point PI decrease). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by adverse events (AEs) and nasal assessments. By-patient and by-episode analyses were completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with IRMS, FPNS significantly improved mean PID(15) scores. 57.5% of FPNS-treated episodes significantly demonstrated onset of PI improvement by 5 minutes and 95.7% by 30 minutes. CMPR (≥ 2-point PI decrease) was seen in 52.4% of episodes by 10 minutes. Only 4.7% of patients withdrew from titration (2.4% in DB/DD phase) because of AEs; no significant nasal effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FPNS was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of BTCP and provided faster onset of analgesia and attainment of CMPR than IRMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"224-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.07.004\",\"citationCount\":\"75\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of supportive oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.07.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

摘要

背景:即刻释放硫酸吗啡(IRMS)仍然是突破性癌性疼痛(BTCP)的标准治疗方法,但其起效与大多数BTCP发作的快速起效和短持续时间不匹配。目的:评价芬太尼果胶鼻喷雾剂(FPNS)与IRMS治疗BTCP的疗效和耐受性。方法:患者(n = 110)在服用≥60mg /天口服吗啡(或同等药物)治疗癌症背景疼痛时,每天出现1 - 4次BTCP发作,进入双盲、双假人(DB/DD)、多重交叉研究。完成滴定期的患者(n = 84)继续进入DB/DD期:10次BTCP随机接受FPNS和口服胶囊安慰剂(5次)或IRMS和鼻喷雾剂安慰剂(5次)治疗。主要终点是疼痛强度(FPNS vs. IRMS)与基线在15分钟(PID(15))的差异(P < 0.05)。次要终点为疼痛强度(PI)下降(≥1点)和达到有临床意义的疼痛缓解时间(CMPR, PI下降≥2点)。通过不良事件(ae)和鼻腔评估来评估安全性和耐受性。完成了逐个患者和逐个发作的分析。结果:与IRMS相比,FPNS显著提高了平均PID(15)评分。57.5%的fpns治疗发作在5分钟内显着改善,95.7%在30分钟内显着改善。CMPR (PI下降≥2点)在10分钟时有52.4%的发作。只有4.7%的患者因不良事件退出滴定(DB/DD期为2.4%);没有明显的鼻效应报道。结论:FPNS治疗BTCP有效,耐受性好,比IRMS镇痛起效快,达到CMPR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of fentanyl pectin nasal spray compared with immediate-release morphine sulfate tablets in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy multiple-crossover study.

Background: Immediate-release morphine sulfate (IRMS) remains the standard treatment for breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP), but its onset of effect does not match the rapid onset and short duration of most BTCP episodes.

Objective: This study will evaluate the efficacy/tolerability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) compared with IRMS for BTCP.

Methods: Patients (n = 110) experiencing one to four BTCP episodes/day while taking ≥ 60 mg/day oral morphine (or equivalent) for background cancer pain entered a double-blind, double-dummy (DB/DD), multiple-crossover study. Patients completing a titration phase (n = 84) continued to a DB/DD phase: 10 episodes of BTCP were randomly treated with FPNS and oral capsule placebo (five episodes) or IRMS and nasal spray placebo (5 episodes). The primary end point was pain intensity (P < .05 FPNS vs. IRMS) difference from baseline at 15 minutes (PID(15)). Secondary end points were onset of pain intensity (PI) decrease (≥ 1-point) and time to clinically meaningful pain relief (CMPR, ≥ 2-point PI decrease). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by adverse events (AEs) and nasal assessments. By-patient and by-episode analyses were completed.

Results: Compared with IRMS, FPNS significantly improved mean PID(15) scores. 57.5% of FPNS-treated episodes significantly demonstrated onset of PI improvement by 5 minutes and 95.7% by 30 minutes. CMPR (≥ 2-point PI decrease) was seen in 52.4% of episodes by 10 minutes. Only 4.7% of patients withdrew from titration (2.4% in DB/DD phase) because of AEs; no significant nasal effects were reported.

Conclusion: FPNS was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of BTCP and provided faster onset of analgesia and attainment of CMPR than IRMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信