重访拥挤更新。

The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report Pub Date : 2007-09-01 Epub Date: 2007-09-24
Kathleen T Call, Lynn A Blewett
{"title":"重访拥挤更新。","authors":"Kathleen T Call, Lynn A Blewett","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crowd-out occurs when the existence of public insurance causes people to shift from private to public coverage, thus stretching scarce government resources to insure those who could access private plans. This update looks at the research published since the 2004 synthesis was released. Key findings include: Some level of crowd-out will always occur with public program expansions. There is a wide range of estimates of crowd-out with lower estimates for low-income children (0 to 15%) and higher rates for higher-income children and longer-term enrollees (35% to 50%). Recent studies confirm the most common anti-crowd-out measures--waiting periods and increased public-plan premiums--discourage both the uninsured and the privately insured from enrolling in public coverage. Crowd-out is more likely when eligibility is expanded to include higher-incomes and entire families. Crowd out can occur based on employers', as well as employees' behaviors, but it appear the recent decline in ESI is more a result of employee take-up rather than employers dropping health benefits. Finally, there is limited research that suggests children with public coverage are better off than those with private insurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":89508,"journal":{"name":"The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report","volume":" 12 Suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting crowd-out update.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen T Call, Lynn A Blewett\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Crowd-out occurs when the existence of public insurance causes people to shift from private to public coverage, thus stretching scarce government resources to insure those who could access private plans. This update looks at the research published since the 2004 synthesis was released. Key findings include: Some level of crowd-out will always occur with public program expansions. There is a wide range of estimates of crowd-out with lower estimates for low-income children (0 to 15%) and higher rates for higher-income children and longer-term enrollees (35% to 50%). Recent studies confirm the most common anti-crowd-out measures--waiting periods and increased public-plan premiums--discourage both the uninsured and the privately insured from enrolling in public coverage. Crowd-out is more likely when eligibility is expanded to include higher-incomes and entire families. Crowd out can occur based on employers', as well as employees' behaviors, but it appear the recent decline in ESI is more a result of employee take-up rather than employers dropping health benefits. Finally, there is limited research that suggests children with public coverage are better off than those with private insurance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report\",\"volume\":\" 12 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2007/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2007/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当公共保险的存在导致人们从私人保险转向公共保险时,就会出现挤出现象,从而扩大了稀缺的政府资源,无法为那些可以参加私人保险计划的人提供保险。本更新着眼于自2004年合成发布以来发表的研究。主要发现包括:随着公共项目的扩张,总会出现一定程度的拥挤。对挤出率的估计范围很广,低收入儿童的估计较低(0 - 15%),高收入儿童和长期参保者的估计较高(35% - 50%)。最近的研究证实,最常见的反挤出措施——等待期和增加公共计划保费——会阻碍未参保人和私人参保人加入公共保险。当资格扩大到包括高收入和整个家庭时,挤出的可能性更大。雇主和员工的行为都可能导致挤出,但最近ESI的下降似乎更多是由于员工的接受,而不是雇主减少健康福利。最后,有有限的研究表明,拥有公共保险的孩子比拥有私人保险的孩子生活得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting crowd-out update.

Crowd-out occurs when the existence of public insurance causes people to shift from private to public coverage, thus stretching scarce government resources to insure those who could access private plans. This update looks at the research published since the 2004 synthesis was released. Key findings include: Some level of crowd-out will always occur with public program expansions. There is a wide range of estimates of crowd-out with lower estimates for low-income children (0 to 15%) and higher rates for higher-income children and longer-term enrollees (35% to 50%). Recent studies confirm the most common anti-crowd-out measures--waiting periods and increased public-plan premiums--discourage both the uninsured and the privately insured from enrolling in public coverage. Crowd-out is more likely when eligibility is expanded to include higher-incomes and entire families. Crowd out can occur based on employers', as well as employees' behaviors, but it appear the recent decline in ESI is more a result of employee take-up rather than employers dropping health benefits. Finally, there is limited research that suggests children with public coverage are better off than those with private insurance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信