类风湿性关节炎的现代治疗策略。

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-11-01
Merete Lund Hetland
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎的现代治疗策略。","authors":"Merete Lund Hetland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main aim of the thesis was to evaluate the impact of modern treatment strategies on disease activity and disease course in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify predictors for treatment response. Two different treatment strategies were investigated: (A) Aggressive, conventional treatment aiming at achieving inflammatory control in patients with recent-onset RA and (B) Treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors in patients with RA, who had an incomplete response to conventional treatment. (A) was studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (CIMESTRA), whereas (B) was investigated in an observational, nationwide cohort study (the DANBIO database). The main findings were: 1. Treatment strategy (A) with methotrexate (MTX) and injections of glucocorticoids into swollen joints had rapid and sustained effect and reduced disease activity and halted joint damage. Addition of cyclosporine during the first 2 years reduced disease activity for as long as it was given, but had no effect on the development of joint damage. After 5 years, the majority of the patients was in remission and had no progression of structural joint damage. 2. Bone marrow oedema by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the wrists predicted the development of structural joint damage 2 to 5 years later (based on x-rays). Anti-CCP antibodies and structural joint damage at the start of treatment were also independent predictors for joint damage after 5 years. 3. Routine registration of adverse events observed in patients who received treatment with etanercept or infliximab (TNFα inhibitors) in the DANBIO database picked up twice as many serious adverse events than the spontaneous, mandatory reports to the Danish Medicines Agency. 4. Despite changes in prescription practice for the treatment with TNFα inhibitors in clinical practice from year 2000 to year 2005 towards less stringent treatment criteria, DANBIO data showed an improved treatment response. 5. High age, low functional status and concomitant treatment with prednisolone were negative predictors of a EULAR good response and remission after 6 months of treatment with TNFα inhibitors in clinical practice. 6. In patients, who were naïve to treatment with TNFα inhibitors, significant differences between drugs were observed regarding treatment responses and adherence to therapies. Infliximab had the lowest treatment response, remission rates and adherence to therapy. Adalimumab had the highest treatment response and remission rates, whereas etanercept had the highest adherence. In conclusion, the results from the CIMESTRA trial and the DANBIO database showed that an aggressive treatment strategy with conventional drugs and intra-articular injections with betamethasone effectively controlled disease activity and prevent structural joint damage in patients with early RA. TNFα inhibitors were efficacious in clinical practice in the treatment of RA patients that had failed conventional treatment. Differences between the TNFα inhibitors regarding efficacy and drug adherence were found. Predictors of disease course and treatment response were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 11","pages":"B4320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Merete Lund Hetland\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The main aim of the thesis was to evaluate the impact of modern treatment strategies on disease activity and disease course in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify predictors for treatment response. Two different treatment strategies were investigated: (A) Aggressive, conventional treatment aiming at achieving inflammatory control in patients with recent-onset RA and (B) Treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors in patients with RA, who had an incomplete response to conventional treatment. (A) was studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (CIMESTRA), whereas (B) was investigated in an observational, nationwide cohort study (the DANBIO database). The main findings were: 1. Treatment strategy (A) with methotrexate (MTX) and injections of glucocorticoids into swollen joints had rapid and sustained effect and reduced disease activity and halted joint damage. Addition of cyclosporine during the first 2 years reduced disease activity for as long as it was given, but had no effect on the development of joint damage. After 5 years, the majority of the patients was in remission and had no progression of structural joint damage. 2. Bone marrow oedema by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the wrists predicted the development of structural joint damage 2 to 5 years later (based on x-rays). Anti-CCP antibodies and structural joint damage at the start of treatment were also independent predictors for joint damage after 5 years. 3. Routine registration of adverse events observed in patients who received treatment with etanercept or infliximab (TNFα inhibitors) in the DANBIO database picked up twice as many serious adverse events than the spontaneous, mandatory reports to the Danish Medicines Agency. 4. Despite changes in prescription practice for the treatment with TNFα inhibitors in clinical practice from year 2000 to year 2005 towards less stringent treatment criteria, DANBIO data showed an improved treatment response. 5. High age, low functional status and concomitant treatment with prednisolone were negative predictors of a EULAR good response and remission after 6 months of treatment with TNFα inhibitors in clinical practice. 6. In patients, who were naïve to treatment with TNFα inhibitors, significant differences between drugs were observed regarding treatment responses and adherence to therapies. Infliximab had the lowest treatment response, remission rates and adherence to therapy. Adalimumab had the highest treatment response and remission rates, whereas etanercept had the highest adherence. In conclusion, the results from the CIMESTRA trial and the DANBIO database showed that an aggressive treatment strategy with conventional drugs and intra-articular injections with betamethasone effectively controlled disease activity and prevent structural joint damage in patients with early RA. TNFα inhibitors were efficacious in clinical practice in the treatment of RA patients that had failed conventional treatment. Differences between the TNFα inhibitors regarding efficacy and drug adherence were found. Predictors of disease course and treatment response were identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"58 11\",\"pages\":\"B4320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本论文的主要目的是评估现代治疗策略对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者疾病活动和病程的影响,并确定治疗反应的预测因子。研究了两种不同的治疗策略:(A)积极的常规治疗,旨在控制新发RA患者的炎症;(B)对常规治疗反应不完全的RA患者使用肿瘤坏死因子α (TNFα)抑制剂治疗。(A)在一项随机、安慰剂对照临床试验(CIMESTRA)中进行研究,而(B)在一项观察性、全国性队列研究(DANBIO数据库)中进行研究。主要发现有:1。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和向肿胀关节注射糖皮质激素的治疗策略(A)具有快速和持续的效果,可减少疾病活动并停止关节损伤。在头2年添加环孢素可以降低疾病活动性,但对关节损伤的发展没有影响。5年后,大多数患者病情缓解,无结构性关节损伤进展。2. 通过对手腕进行磁共振成像(MRI)扫描,骨髓水肿可以预测2至5年后(基于x射线)结构性关节损伤的发展。抗ccp抗体和治疗开始时的结构性关节损伤也是5年后关节损伤的独立预测因子。3.在DANBIO数据库中,接受依那西普或英夫利昔单抗(TNFα抑制剂)治疗的患者中观察到的不良事件的常规登记是自发的,强制性报告给丹麦药品管理局的不良事件的两倍。尽管从2000年到2005年,临床实践中使用TNFα抑制剂治疗的处方实践发生了变化,治疗标准变得不那么严格,但DANBIO数据显示治疗反应得到了改善。5. 在临床实践中,高年龄、低功能状态和同时使用强的松龙治疗是TNFα抑制剂治疗6个月后EULAR良好反应和缓解的阴性预测因素。6. 在接受TNFα抑制剂治疗naïve的患者中,观察到药物之间在治疗反应和治疗依从性方面的显着差异。英夫利昔单抗的治疗反应、缓解率和治疗依从性最低。阿达木单抗具有最高的治疗反应和缓解率,而依那西普具有最高的依从性。总之,CIMESTRA试验和DANBIO数据库的结果表明,常规药物和关节内注射倍他米松的积极治疗策略有效地控制了早期RA患者的疾病活动并预防了结构性关节损伤。TNFα抑制剂在常规治疗失败的RA患者的临床实践中是有效的。发现TNFα抑制剂在疗效和药物依从性方面存在差异。确定病程和治疗反应的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis.

The main aim of the thesis was to evaluate the impact of modern treatment strategies on disease activity and disease course in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify predictors for treatment response. Two different treatment strategies were investigated: (A) Aggressive, conventional treatment aiming at achieving inflammatory control in patients with recent-onset RA and (B) Treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors in patients with RA, who had an incomplete response to conventional treatment. (A) was studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (CIMESTRA), whereas (B) was investigated in an observational, nationwide cohort study (the DANBIO database). The main findings were: 1. Treatment strategy (A) with methotrexate (MTX) and injections of glucocorticoids into swollen joints had rapid and sustained effect and reduced disease activity and halted joint damage. Addition of cyclosporine during the first 2 years reduced disease activity for as long as it was given, but had no effect on the development of joint damage. After 5 years, the majority of the patients was in remission and had no progression of structural joint damage. 2. Bone marrow oedema by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the wrists predicted the development of structural joint damage 2 to 5 years later (based on x-rays). Anti-CCP antibodies and structural joint damage at the start of treatment were also independent predictors for joint damage after 5 years. 3. Routine registration of adverse events observed in patients who received treatment with etanercept or infliximab (TNFα inhibitors) in the DANBIO database picked up twice as many serious adverse events than the spontaneous, mandatory reports to the Danish Medicines Agency. 4. Despite changes in prescription practice for the treatment with TNFα inhibitors in clinical practice from year 2000 to year 2005 towards less stringent treatment criteria, DANBIO data showed an improved treatment response. 5. High age, low functional status and concomitant treatment with prednisolone were negative predictors of a EULAR good response and remission after 6 months of treatment with TNFα inhibitors in clinical practice. 6. In patients, who were naïve to treatment with TNFα inhibitors, significant differences between drugs were observed regarding treatment responses and adherence to therapies. Infliximab had the lowest treatment response, remission rates and adherence to therapy. Adalimumab had the highest treatment response and remission rates, whereas etanercept had the highest adherence. In conclusion, the results from the CIMESTRA trial and the DANBIO database showed that an aggressive treatment strategy with conventional drugs and intra-articular injections with betamethasone effectively controlled disease activity and prevent structural joint damage in patients with early RA. TNFα inhibitors were efficacious in clinical practice in the treatment of RA patients that had failed conventional treatment. Differences between the TNFα inhibitors regarding efficacy and drug adherence were found. Predictors of disease course and treatment response were identified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信