南非四所教学医院的数字放射摄影实践调查:一项启发性研究。

T Nyathi, Tf Chirwa, Dg van der Merwe
{"title":"南非四所教学医院的数字放射摄影实践调查:一项启发性研究。","authors":"T Nyathi,&nbsp;Tf Chirwa,&nbsp;Dg van der Merwe","doi":"10.2349/biij.6.1.e5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess radiographer familiarity and preferences with digital radiography in four teaching hospitals and thereafter make recommendations in line with the migration from screen film to digital radiography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A questionnaire was designed to collect data from either qualified or student radiographers from four teaching hospitals. From the four teaching hospitals, there were a total of 205 potential respondents. Among other things, responses regarding experiences and preferences with digital radiography, quality control procedures, patient dose, advantages and disadvantages of digital radiography were sought. The information collected was based on self-reporting by the participants. The study is exploratory in nature and descriptive statistics were generated from the collected data using Microsoft Excel 2007 and StatsDirect software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three out of 205 (31%) radiographers from all the four radiology centers responded to the circulated questionnaire. Only 15% (8) of the qualified radiographers had 4 or more years of experience with digital radiography compared to 68% (36) for the same amount of experience with screen-film radiography. Sixty-one percent (38) of the participants had been exposed to digital radiography during their lectures while at university. A small proportion, 16% (10) of the respondents underwent formal training in quality control procedures on the digital X-ray units they were using. Slightly more than half (55%) of the participants felt it was easier for them to retake an image in digital radiography than in screen film radiography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey showed that the participants are familiar with digital radiography and have embraced this relatively new technology as shown by the fact that they can identify both its advantages and disadvantages as applied to clinical practice. However, there are minimal quality control procedures specific to digital radiography being undertaken as such there is need for formal education, continuing education and manufacturer training with respect to quality control as institutions make the transition from conventional screen film radiology to digital radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":89331,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical imaging and intervention journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2349/biij.6.1.e5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study.\",\"authors\":\"T Nyathi,&nbsp;Tf Chirwa,&nbsp;Dg van der Merwe\",\"doi\":\"10.2349/biij.6.1.e5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess radiographer familiarity and preferences with digital radiography in four teaching hospitals and thereafter make recommendations in line with the migration from screen film to digital radiography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A questionnaire was designed to collect data from either qualified or student radiographers from four teaching hospitals. From the four teaching hospitals, there were a total of 205 potential respondents. Among other things, responses regarding experiences and preferences with digital radiography, quality control procedures, patient dose, advantages and disadvantages of digital radiography were sought. The information collected was based on self-reporting by the participants. The study is exploratory in nature and descriptive statistics were generated from the collected data using Microsoft Excel 2007 and StatsDirect software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three out of 205 (31%) radiographers from all the four radiology centers responded to the circulated questionnaire. Only 15% (8) of the qualified radiographers had 4 or more years of experience with digital radiography compared to 68% (36) for the same amount of experience with screen-film radiography. Sixty-one percent (38) of the participants had been exposed to digital radiography during their lectures while at university. A small proportion, 16% (10) of the respondents underwent formal training in quality control procedures on the digital X-ray units they were using. Slightly more than half (55%) of the participants felt it was easier for them to retake an image in digital radiography than in screen film radiography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey showed that the participants are familiar with digital radiography and have embraced this relatively new technology as shown by the fact that they can identify both its advantages and disadvantages as applied to clinical practice. However, there are minimal quality control procedures specific to digital radiography being undertaken as such there is need for formal education, continuing education and manufacturer training with respect to quality control as institutions make the transition from conventional screen film radiology to digital radiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical imaging and intervention journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"e5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2349/biij.6.1.e5\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical imaging and intervention journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.6.1.e5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical imaging and intervention journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.6.1.e5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估四家教学医院放射技师对数字放射摄影的熟悉程度和偏好,然后根据从银幕胶片到数字放射摄影的迁移提出建议。材料和方法:设计一份调查问卷,收集来自四所教学医院的合格或实习放射技师的数据。从四所教学医院中,总共有205名潜在的受访者。除其他事项外,对数字放射照相的经验和偏好、质量控制程序、患者剂量、数字放射照相的优点和缺点进行了回应。收集的信息是基于参与者的自我报告。本研究是探索性的,使用Microsoft Excel 2007和StatsDirect软件对收集的数据进行描述性统计。结果:来自所有四个放射中心的205名放射技师中有63名(31%)回答了循环问卷。只有15%(8名)合资格放射技师有4年或以上的数码放射摄影经验,而有相同经验的胶片放射技师则有68%(36名)。61%(38)的参与者在大学期间的讲座中接触过数字射线照相。一小部分,16%(10)的受访者接受了他们正在使用的数字x光机质量控制程序的正式培训。略多于一半(55%)的参与者认为用数字放射线照相比用胶片放射线照相更容易重拍图像。结论:本次调查的结果表明,参与者熟悉数字放射照相,并接受了这一相对较新的技术,这一事实表明,他们可以识别其优点和缺点,应用于临床实践。然而,目前针对数字放射照相的质量控制程序很少,因此,在机构从传统屏幕胶片放射学向数字放射学过渡的过程中,需要对质量控制进行正规教育、继续教育和制造商培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study.

A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess radiographer familiarity and preferences with digital radiography in four teaching hospitals and thereafter make recommendations in line with the migration from screen film to digital radiography.

Materials and methods: A questionnaire was designed to collect data from either qualified or student radiographers from four teaching hospitals. From the four teaching hospitals, there were a total of 205 potential respondents. Among other things, responses regarding experiences and preferences with digital radiography, quality control procedures, patient dose, advantages and disadvantages of digital radiography were sought. The information collected was based on self-reporting by the participants. The study is exploratory in nature and descriptive statistics were generated from the collected data using Microsoft Excel 2007 and StatsDirect software.

Results: Sixty-three out of 205 (31%) radiographers from all the four radiology centers responded to the circulated questionnaire. Only 15% (8) of the qualified radiographers had 4 or more years of experience with digital radiography compared to 68% (36) for the same amount of experience with screen-film radiography. Sixty-one percent (38) of the participants had been exposed to digital radiography during their lectures while at university. A small proportion, 16% (10) of the respondents underwent formal training in quality control procedures on the digital X-ray units they were using. Slightly more than half (55%) of the participants felt it was easier for them to retake an image in digital radiography than in screen film radiography.

Conclusion: The results of this survey showed that the participants are familiar with digital radiography and have embraced this relatively new technology as shown by the fact that they can identify both its advantages and disadvantages as applied to clinical practice. However, there are minimal quality control procedures specific to digital radiography being undertaken as such there is need for formal education, continuing education and manufacturer training with respect to quality control as institutions make the transition from conventional screen film radiology to digital radiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信