{"title":"静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗因抗a抗体引起的溶血。","authors":"S Morgan, P Sorensen, G Vercellotti, N D Zantek","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01078.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to treat an increasing number of conditions. IVIG contains immunoglobulin G (IgG) directed against many targets, including red blood cell (RBC) antigens.</p><p><strong>Methods/materials: </strong>We report on three patients identified within a 7-month period in a single institution who developed haemolysis because of passively transferred anti-A.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were a 34-year-old A (non-A1) D-positive male with aplastic anaemia, a 61-year-old A1 D-negative female with myasthenia gravis and a 57-year-old AB D-positive female lung transplant recipient. The haemoglobin decreased from 11.1 to 5.3 g dL(-1) over 2 days, 12.8 to 7.8 g dL(-1) over 6 days and 7.8 to 6.0 g dL(-1) over several hours, respectively. All three patients had a negative antibody screen, positive direct antiglobulin test for IgG only and an elution containing anti-A1 reactivity. The patients were transfused with O RBC with an appropriate rise in haemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These cases illustrate the potential severity of haemolysis after IVIG because of passively transferred antibodies to blood group antigens. Lack of recognition of IVIG as a cause for haemolysis by clinicians may be further confounded if routine testing fails to detect the passively transferred ABO blood group antibodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":442504,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"267-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01078.x","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Haemolysis after treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin due to anti-A.\",\"authors\":\"S Morgan, P Sorensen, G Vercellotti, N D Zantek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01078.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to treat an increasing number of conditions. IVIG contains immunoglobulin G (IgG) directed against many targets, including red blood cell (RBC) antigens.</p><p><strong>Methods/materials: </strong>We report on three patients identified within a 7-month period in a single institution who developed haemolysis because of passively transferred anti-A.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were a 34-year-old A (non-A1) D-positive male with aplastic anaemia, a 61-year-old A1 D-negative female with myasthenia gravis and a 57-year-old AB D-positive female lung transplant recipient. The haemoglobin decreased from 11.1 to 5.3 g dL(-1) over 2 days, 12.8 to 7.8 g dL(-1) over 6 days and 7.8 to 6.0 g dL(-1) over several hours, respectively. All three patients had a negative antibody screen, positive direct antiglobulin test for IgG only and an elution containing anti-A1 reactivity. The patients were transfused with O RBC with an appropriate rise in haemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These cases illustrate the potential severity of haemolysis after IVIG because of passively transferred antibodies to blood group antigens. Lack of recognition of IVIG as a cause for haemolysis by clinicians may be further confounded if routine testing fails to detect the passively transferred ABO blood group antibodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":442504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"267-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01078.x\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01078.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01078.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
摘要
背景:静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)用于治疗越来越多的疾病。IVIG含有免疫球蛋白G (IgG),可针对多种靶标,包括红细胞(RBC)抗原。方法/材料:我们报告了在一个机构中发现的3例7个月内因被动转移抗- a而发生溶血的患者。结果:34岁a(非A1) d阳性男性伴再生障碍性贫血,61岁A1 d阴性女性伴重症肌无力,57岁AB d阳性女性肺移植接受者。血红蛋白在2天内分别从11.1降至5.3 g dL(-1),在6天内从12.8降至7.8 g dL(-1),在几个小时内分别从7.8降至6.0 g dL(-1)。3例患者抗体筛查均为阴性,IgG直接抗球蛋白试验阳性,洗脱液含抗a1反应性。患者输注O型红细胞,血红蛋白适当升高。结论:这些病例说明了IVIG后溶血的潜在严重性,因为抗体被动转移到血型抗原。如果常规检测不能检测到被动转移的ABO血型抗体,临床医生对IVIG作为溶血原因的认识不足可能会进一步混淆。
Haemolysis after treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin due to anti-A.
Background: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to treat an increasing number of conditions. IVIG contains immunoglobulin G (IgG) directed against many targets, including red blood cell (RBC) antigens.
Methods/materials: We report on three patients identified within a 7-month period in a single institution who developed haemolysis because of passively transferred anti-A.
Results: The patients were a 34-year-old A (non-A1) D-positive male with aplastic anaemia, a 61-year-old A1 D-negative female with myasthenia gravis and a 57-year-old AB D-positive female lung transplant recipient. The haemoglobin decreased from 11.1 to 5.3 g dL(-1) over 2 days, 12.8 to 7.8 g dL(-1) over 6 days and 7.8 to 6.0 g dL(-1) over several hours, respectively. All three patients had a negative antibody screen, positive direct antiglobulin test for IgG only and an elution containing anti-A1 reactivity. The patients were transfused with O RBC with an appropriate rise in haemoglobin.
Conclusion: These cases illustrate the potential severity of haemolysis after IVIG because of passively transferred antibodies to blood group antigens. Lack of recognition of IVIG as a cause for haemolysis by clinicians may be further confounded if routine testing fails to detect the passively transferred ABO blood group antibodies.