用阵列CGH评价同源重组和体细胞克隆牛转基因细胞系的基因组完整性。

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
George E Liu, Yali Hou, James M Robl, Yoshimi Kuroiwa, Zhongde Wang
{"title":"用阵列CGH评价同源重组和体细胞克隆牛转基因细胞系的基因组完整性。","authors":"George E Liu,&nbsp;Yali Hou,&nbsp;James M Robl,&nbsp;Yoshimi Kuroiwa,&nbsp;Zhongde Wang","doi":"10.1186/2041-9414-2-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgenic cattle carrying multiple genomic modifications have been produced by serial rounds of somatic cell chromatin transfer (cloning) of sequentially genetically targeted somatic cells. However, cloning efficiency tends to decline with the increase of rounds of cloning. It is possible that multiple rounds of cloning compromise the genome integrity or/and introduce epigenetic errors in the resulting cell lines, rendering a decline in cloning. To test these possibilities, we performed 9 high density array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) experiments to test the genome integrity in 3 independent bovine transgenic cell lineages generated from genetic modification and cloning. Our plan included the control hybridizations (self to self) of the 3 founder cell lines and 6 comparative hybridizations between these founders and their derived cell lines with either high or low cloning efficiencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We detected similar amounts of differences between the control hybridizations (8, 13 and 39 differences) and the comparative analyses of both \"high\" and \"low\" cell lines (ranging from 7 to 57 with a mean of ~20). Almost 75% of the large differences (>10 kb) and about 45% of all differences shared the same type (loss or gain) and were located in nearby genomic regions across hybridizations. Therefore, it is likely that they were not true differences but caused by systematic factors associated with local genomic features (e.g. GC contents).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal that large copy number variations are less likely to arise during genetic targeting and serial rounds of cloning, fortifying the notion that epigenetic errors introduced from serial cloning may be responsible for the cloning efficiency decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":53596,"journal":{"name":"Genome Integrity","volume":" ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2041-9414-2-6","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of genome integrity with array CGH in cattle transgenic cell lines produced by homologous recombination and somatic cell cloning.\",\"authors\":\"George E Liu,&nbsp;Yali Hou,&nbsp;James M Robl,&nbsp;Yoshimi Kuroiwa,&nbsp;Zhongde Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/2041-9414-2-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgenic cattle carrying multiple genomic modifications have been produced by serial rounds of somatic cell chromatin transfer (cloning) of sequentially genetically targeted somatic cells. However, cloning efficiency tends to decline with the increase of rounds of cloning. It is possible that multiple rounds of cloning compromise the genome integrity or/and introduce epigenetic errors in the resulting cell lines, rendering a decline in cloning. To test these possibilities, we performed 9 high density array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) experiments to test the genome integrity in 3 independent bovine transgenic cell lineages generated from genetic modification and cloning. Our plan included the control hybridizations (self to self) of the 3 founder cell lines and 6 comparative hybridizations between these founders and their derived cell lines with either high or low cloning efficiencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We detected similar amounts of differences between the control hybridizations (8, 13 and 39 differences) and the comparative analyses of both \\\"high\\\" and \\\"low\\\" cell lines (ranging from 7 to 57 with a mean of ~20). Almost 75% of the large differences (>10 kb) and about 45% of all differences shared the same type (loss or gain) and were located in nearby genomic regions across hybridizations. Therefore, it is likely that they were not true differences but caused by systematic factors associated with local genomic features (e.g. GC contents).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal that large copy number variations are less likely to arise during genetic targeting and serial rounds of cloning, fortifying the notion that epigenetic errors introduced from serial cloning may be responsible for the cloning efficiency decline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Integrity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2041-9414-2-6\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Integrity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-9414-2-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-9414-2-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:通过对连续的基因靶向体细胞进行连续的体细胞染色质转移(克隆),已经产生了携带多种基因组修饰的转基因牛。但随着克隆次数的增加,克隆效率呈下降趋势。多轮克隆可能会损害基因组的完整性或/并在所产生的细胞系中引入表观遗传错误,从而导致克隆的减少。为了验证这些可能性,我们进行了9个高密度阵列比较基因组杂交(CGH)实验,以测试3个通过基因修饰和克隆产生的独立牛转基因细胞系的基因组完整性。我们的计划包括3个建立细胞系的对照杂交(自我杂交)和6个建立细胞系与其衍生细胞系之间的比较杂交,克隆效率分别为高和低。结果:我们在对照杂交(8、13和39个差异)和“高”和“低”细胞系的比较分析(范围从7到57,平均约20)之间检测到相似的差异。近75%的大差异(>10 kb)和45%的所有差异具有相同的类型(损失或获得),并且在杂交中位于附近的基因组区域。因此,它们很可能不是真正的差异,而是由与局部基因组特征(如GC含量)相关的系统因素引起的。结论:本研究结果表明,在基因靶向和连续克隆过程中,不太可能出现大的拷贝数变异,强化了由连续克隆引入的表观遗传错误可能是克隆效率下降的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of genome integrity with array CGH in cattle transgenic cell lines produced by homologous recombination and somatic cell cloning.

Assessment of genome integrity with array CGH in cattle transgenic cell lines produced by homologous recombination and somatic cell cloning.

Assessment of genome integrity with array CGH in cattle transgenic cell lines produced by homologous recombination and somatic cell cloning.

Background: Transgenic cattle carrying multiple genomic modifications have been produced by serial rounds of somatic cell chromatin transfer (cloning) of sequentially genetically targeted somatic cells. However, cloning efficiency tends to decline with the increase of rounds of cloning. It is possible that multiple rounds of cloning compromise the genome integrity or/and introduce epigenetic errors in the resulting cell lines, rendering a decline in cloning. To test these possibilities, we performed 9 high density array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) experiments to test the genome integrity in 3 independent bovine transgenic cell lineages generated from genetic modification and cloning. Our plan included the control hybridizations (self to self) of the 3 founder cell lines and 6 comparative hybridizations between these founders and their derived cell lines with either high or low cloning efficiencies.

Results: We detected similar amounts of differences between the control hybridizations (8, 13 and 39 differences) and the comparative analyses of both "high" and "low" cell lines (ranging from 7 to 57 with a mean of ~20). Almost 75% of the large differences (>10 kb) and about 45% of all differences shared the same type (loss or gain) and were located in nearby genomic regions across hybridizations. Therefore, it is likely that they were not true differences but caused by systematic factors associated with local genomic features (e.g. GC contents).

Conclusions: Our findings reveal that large copy number variations are less likely to arise during genetic targeting and serial rounds of cloning, fortifying the notion that epigenetic errors introduced from serial cloning may be responsible for the cloning efficiency decline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Integrity
Genome Integrity Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信