螺内酯治疗心力衰竭的使用、耐受性和依从性。

Jean Lachaine, Catherine Beauchemin, Elodie Ramos
{"title":"螺内酯治疗心力衰竭的使用、耐受性和依从性。","authors":"Jean Lachaine,&nbsp;Catherine Beauchemin,&nbsp;Elodie Ramos","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-11-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure (HF) is reduced by blockade of aldosterone receptors with spironolactone. However, benefits of spironolactone are potentially limited by treatment compliance and adverse events profile. The aim of this study was to estimate use of spironolactone by patients with HF, incidence of key adverse events, and patient compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed using data from the Quebec provincial medical and drug plans (Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec, RAMQ) for patients who had a diagnosis of HF. Relative incidence of gynecomastia and hyperkalemia was estimated for users and non-users of spironolactone. Treatment adherence was estimated for users of spironolactone and compared to adherence with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers (β-blockers), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RAMQ data were obtained for a total of 82,018 patients with a diagnosis of HF. Of these patients, 59.9% used an ACE inhibitor, 59.5% used a beta-blocker, 28.4% used an ARB, and 15.1% (n = 12,344) used spironolactone. Despite underestimation due to limitation of the database, the documented incidence of hyperkalemia (3.3% versus 1.4%) and gynecomastia (1.8% versus 0.7%) was significantly higher in spironolactone users than non-users (p < 0.001). Treatment compliance was significantly lower with spironolactone compared to ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, and ARBs (45.6% versus 56.1%, 59.7%, and 57.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). Persistence to treatment over a one-year period was also lower with spironolactone compared to ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, and ARBs (50.7% versus 64.5%, 70.4%, and 66.3%, respectively; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of spironolactone is associated with an incidence of adverse events, which may have an impact on treatment compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-11-4","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use, tolerability and compliance of spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure.\",\"authors\":\"Jean Lachaine,&nbsp;Catherine Beauchemin,&nbsp;Elodie Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1472-6904-11-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure (HF) is reduced by blockade of aldosterone receptors with spironolactone. However, benefits of spironolactone are potentially limited by treatment compliance and adverse events profile. The aim of this study was to estimate use of spironolactone by patients with HF, incidence of key adverse events, and patient compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed using data from the Quebec provincial medical and drug plans (Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec, RAMQ) for patients who had a diagnosis of HF. Relative incidence of gynecomastia and hyperkalemia was estimated for users and non-users of spironolactone. Treatment adherence was estimated for users of spironolactone and compared to adherence with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers (β-blockers), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RAMQ data were obtained for a total of 82,018 patients with a diagnosis of HF. Of these patients, 59.9% used an ACE inhibitor, 59.5% used a beta-blocker, 28.4% used an ARB, and 15.1% (n = 12,344) used spironolactone. Despite underestimation due to limitation of the database, the documented incidence of hyperkalemia (3.3% versus 1.4%) and gynecomastia (1.8% versus 0.7%) was significantly higher in spironolactone users than non-users (p < 0.001). Treatment compliance was significantly lower with spironolactone compared to ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, and ARBs (45.6% versus 56.1%, 59.7%, and 57.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). Persistence to treatment over a one-year period was also lower with spironolactone compared to ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, and ARBs (50.7% versus 64.5%, 70.4%, and 66.3%, respectively; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of spironolactone is associated with an incidence of adverse events, which may have an impact on treatment compliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-11-4\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-11-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-11-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

背景:用螺内酯阻断醛固酮受体可降低严重心力衰竭(HF)患者的发病和死亡风险。然而,螺内酯的益处可能受到治疗依从性和不良事件概况的限制。本研究的目的是评估HF患者使用螺内酯的情况、主要不良事件的发生率和患者的依从性。方法:本研究使用来自魁北克省医疗和药物计划(RAMQ)的数据,用于诊断为HF的患者。估计使用和不使用螺内酯的男性乳房发育症和高钾血症的相对发生率。评估了螺内酯使用者的治疗依从性,并与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂(β-阻滞剂)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)的依从性进行了比较。结果:共获得了82018例HF诊断患者的RAMQ数据。在这些患者中,59.9%使用ACE抑制剂,59.5%使用β受体阻滞剂,28.4%使用ARB, 15.1% (n = 12,344)使用螺内酯。尽管由于数据库的限制而被低估,但螺内酯服用者的高钾血症(3.3%对1.4%)和男性乳房发育症(1.8%对0.7%)的发生率明显高于非服用者(p < 0.001)。与ACE抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂和arb相比,螺内酯治疗依从性显著降低(分别为45.6%、56.1%、59.7%和57.0%;P < 0.001)。与ACE抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂和arb相比,螺内酯治疗一年的持续治疗也较低(分别为50.7%比64.5%、70.4%和66.3%;P < 0.001)。结论:使用螺内酯与不良事件发生率相关,可能影响治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use, tolerability and compliance of spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure.

Background: Risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure (HF) is reduced by blockade of aldosterone receptors with spironolactone. However, benefits of spironolactone are potentially limited by treatment compliance and adverse events profile. The aim of this study was to estimate use of spironolactone by patients with HF, incidence of key adverse events, and patient compliance.

Methods: This study was performed using data from the Quebec provincial medical and drug plans (Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec, RAMQ) for patients who had a diagnosis of HF. Relative incidence of gynecomastia and hyperkalemia was estimated for users and non-users of spironolactone. Treatment adherence was estimated for users of spironolactone and compared to adherence with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers (β-blockers), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

Results: RAMQ data were obtained for a total of 82,018 patients with a diagnosis of HF. Of these patients, 59.9% used an ACE inhibitor, 59.5% used a beta-blocker, 28.4% used an ARB, and 15.1% (n = 12,344) used spironolactone. Despite underestimation due to limitation of the database, the documented incidence of hyperkalemia (3.3% versus 1.4%) and gynecomastia (1.8% versus 0.7%) was significantly higher in spironolactone users than non-users (p < 0.001). Treatment compliance was significantly lower with spironolactone compared to ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, and ARBs (45.6% versus 56.1%, 59.7%, and 57.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). Persistence to treatment over a one-year period was also lower with spironolactone compared to ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, and ARBs (50.7% versus 64.5%, 70.4%, and 66.3%, respectively; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Use of spironolactone is associated with an incidence of adverse events, which may have an impact on treatment compliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信