腰痛患者进行稳定和不稳定桥接运动时横腹激活的差异

Susan A Saliba, Ted Croy, Rebecca Guthrie, Dustin Grooms, Arthur Weltman, Terry L Grindstaff
{"title":"腰痛患者进行稳定和不稳定桥接运动时横腹激活的差异","authors":"Susan A Saliba,&nbsp;Ted Croy,&nbsp;Rebecca Guthrie,&nbsp;Dustin Grooms,&nbsp;Arthur Weltman,&nbsp;Terry L Grindstaff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transversus abdominis (TrA) is a spine stabilizer frequently targeted during rehabilitation exercises for individuals with low back pain (LBP). Performance of exercises on unstable surfaces is thought to increase muscle activation, however no research has investigated differences in TrA activation when stable or unstable surfaces are used.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether TrA activation in individuals with LBP is greater when performing bridging exercises on an unstable surface versus a stable surface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty one adults (mean ± SD, age 23.1 ± 6.0 years, height 173.60 ± 10.5 cm, mass 74.7 ± 14.5 kg) with stabilization classification of LBP were randomly assigned to either exercise progression utilizing a sling bridge device or a traditional bridging exercise progression, each with 4 levels of increasing difficulty. TrA activation ratio (TrA contracted thickness/TrA resting thickness) was measured during each exercise using ultrasound imaging. The dependent variable was the TrA activation ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first 3 levels of the sling-based and traditional bridging exercise progression were not significantly different. There was a significant increase in the TrA activation ratio in the sling-based exercise group when bridging was performed with abduction of the hip (1.48 ± .38) compared to the traditional bridge with abduction of the hip (1.22 ± .38; p<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both types of exercise result in activation of the TrA, however, the sling based exercise when combined with dynamic movement resulted in a significantly higher activation of the local stabilizers of the spine compared to traditional bridging exercise. This may have implications for rehabilitation of individuals with LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":88617,"journal":{"name":"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT","volume":"5 2","pages":"63-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953390/pdf/najspt-05-063.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in transverse abdominis activation with stable and unstable bridging exercises in individuals with low back pain.\",\"authors\":\"Susan A Saliba,&nbsp;Ted Croy,&nbsp;Rebecca Guthrie,&nbsp;Dustin Grooms,&nbsp;Arthur Weltman,&nbsp;Terry L Grindstaff\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transversus abdominis (TrA) is a spine stabilizer frequently targeted during rehabilitation exercises for individuals with low back pain (LBP). Performance of exercises on unstable surfaces is thought to increase muscle activation, however no research has investigated differences in TrA activation when stable or unstable surfaces are used.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether TrA activation in individuals with LBP is greater when performing bridging exercises on an unstable surface versus a stable surface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty one adults (mean ± SD, age 23.1 ± 6.0 years, height 173.60 ± 10.5 cm, mass 74.7 ± 14.5 kg) with stabilization classification of LBP were randomly assigned to either exercise progression utilizing a sling bridge device or a traditional bridging exercise progression, each with 4 levels of increasing difficulty. TrA activation ratio (TrA contracted thickness/TrA resting thickness) was measured during each exercise using ultrasound imaging. The dependent variable was the TrA activation ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first 3 levels of the sling-based and traditional bridging exercise progression were not significantly different. There was a significant increase in the TrA activation ratio in the sling-based exercise group when bridging was performed with abduction of the hip (1.48 ± .38) compared to the traditional bridge with abduction of the hip (1.22 ± .38; p<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both types of exercise result in activation of the TrA, however, the sling based exercise when combined with dynamic movement resulted in a significantly higher activation of the local stabilizers of the spine compared to traditional bridging exercise. This may have implications for rehabilitation of individuals with LBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"63-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953390/pdf/najspt-05-063.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹横肌(TrA)是一种脊柱稳定剂,经常用于腰痛(LBP)患者的康复训练。在不稳定的表面上进行运动被认为会增加肌肉的激活,但是没有研究调查在稳定或不稳定的表面上进行运动时TrA激活的差异。目的:本研究的目的是研究在不稳定表面与稳定表面进行桥接练习时,LBP患者的TrA激活是否更大。方法:51名腰痛稳定分级的成人(平均±SD,年龄23.1±6.0岁,身高173.60±10.5 cm,体重74.7±14.5 kg)随机分为使用吊桥装置和传统桥式运动两组,每组难度增加4个等级。在每次运动过程中使用超声成像测量TrA激活比(TrA收缩厚度/TrA静息厚度)。因变量为TrA激活比。结果:吊带式与传统桥式运动前3个阶段的进展无显著性差异。与传统桥接髋关节外展组(1.22±0.38)相比,吊带运动组在桥接髋关节外展时TrA激活比显著增加(1.48±0.38);结论:两种类型的运动都能激活TrA,然而,与传统桥接运动相比,基于吊带的运动与动态运动相结合可显著提高脊柱局部稳定器的激活。这可能对腰痛患者的康复有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Differences in transverse abdominis activation with stable and unstable bridging exercises in individuals with low back pain.

Differences in transverse abdominis activation with stable and unstable bridging exercises in individuals with low back pain.

Differences in transverse abdominis activation with stable and unstable bridging exercises in individuals with low back pain.

Differences in transverse abdominis activation with stable and unstable bridging exercises in individuals with low back pain.

Background: The transversus abdominis (TrA) is a spine stabilizer frequently targeted during rehabilitation exercises for individuals with low back pain (LBP). Performance of exercises on unstable surfaces is thought to increase muscle activation, however no research has investigated differences in TrA activation when stable or unstable surfaces are used.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether TrA activation in individuals with LBP is greater when performing bridging exercises on an unstable surface versus a stable surface.

Methods: Fifty one adults (mean ± SD, age 23.1 ± 6.0 years, height 173.60 ± 10.5 cm, mass 74.7 ± 14.5 kg) with stabilization classification of LBP were randomly assigned to either exercise progression utilizing a sling bridge device or a traditional bridging exercise progression, each with 4 levels of increasing difficulty. TrA activation ratio (TrA contracted thickness/TrA resting thickness) was measured during each exercise using ultrasound imaging. The dependent variable was the TrA activation ratio.

Results: The first 3 levels of the sling-based and traditional bridging exercise progression were not significantly different. There was a significant increase in the TrA activation ratio in the sling-based exercise group when bridging was performed with abduction of the hip (1.48 ± .38) compared to the traditional bridge with abduction of the hip (1.22 ± .38; p<.05).

Conclusion: Both types of exercise result in activation of the TrA, however, the sling based exercise when combined with dynamic movement resulted in a significantly higher activation of the local stabilizers of the spine compared to traditional bridging exercise. This may have implications for rehabilitation of individuals with LBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信