揭示物质使用的多种途径:确定人口亚群的方法的比较。

Lisa Dierker, Jennifer Rose, Xianming Tan, Runze Li
{"title":"揭示物质使用的多种途径:确定人口亚群的方法的比较。","authors":"Lisa Dierker, Jennifer Rose, Xianming Tan, Runze Li","doi":"10.1007/s10935-010-0224-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes and compares a selection of available modeling techniques for identifying homogeneous population subgroups in the interest of informing targeted substance use intervention. We present a nontechnical review of the common and unique features of three methods: (a) trajectory analysis, (b) functional hierarchical linear modeling (FHLM), and (c) decision tree methods. Differences among the techniques are described, including required data features, strengths and limitations in terms of the flexibility with which outcomes and predictors can be modeled, and the potential of each technique for helping to inform the selection of targets and timing of substance intervention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":231565,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Primary Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"333-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3107529/pdf/nihms296394.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering multiple pathways to substance use: a comparison of methods for identifying population subgroups.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Dierker, Jennifer Rose, Xianming Tan, Runze Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10935-010-0224-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper describes and compares a selection of available modeling techniques for identifying homogeneous population subgroups in the interest of informing targeted substance use intervention. We present a nontechnical review of the common and unique features of three methods: (a) trajectory analysis, (b) functional hierarchical linear modeling (FHLM), and (c) decision tree methods. Differences among the techniques are described, including required data features, strengths and limitations in terms of the flexibility with which outcomes and predictors can be modeled, and the potential of each technique for helping to inform the selection of targets and timing of substance intervention programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":231565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Primary Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"333-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3107529/pdf/nihms296394.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Primary Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-010-0224-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Primary Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-010-0224-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述并比较了选择可用的建模技术,以确定同质人口亚群,为有针对性的物质使用干预提供信息。我们对三种方法的共同和独特之处进行了非技术回顾:(a)轨迹分析,(b)功能层次线性建模(FHLM)和(c)决策树方法。描述了这些技术之间的差异,包括所需的数据特征、优势和局限性,以及结果和预测因子建模的灵活性,以及每种技术在帮助选择目标和物质干预计划时机方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uncovering multiple pathways to substance use: a comparison of methods for identifying population subgroups.

Uncovering multiple pathways to substance use: a comparison of methods for identifying population subgroups.

This paper describes and compares a selection of available modeling techniques for identifying homogeneous population subgroups in the interest of informing targeted substance use intervention. We present a nontechnical review of the common and unique features of three methods: (a) trajectory analysis, (b) functional hierarchical linear modeling (FHLM), and (c) decision tree methods. Differences among the techniques are described, including required data features, strengths and limitations in terms of the flexibility with which outcomes and predictors can be modeled, and the potential of each technique for helping to inform the selection of targets and timing of substance intervention programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信