多色共聚焦扫描激光检眼镜在后葡萄膜炎中的成像。

Kajree Gupta, Aniruddha Agarwal, Atul Arora, Kanika Aggarwal, Reema Bansal, Deeksha Katoch, Alessandro Marchese, Simar R Singh, Rupesh Agrawal, Vishali Gupta
{"title":"多色共聚焦扫描激光检眼镜在后葡萄膜炎中的成像。","authors":"Kajree Gupta,&nbsp;Aniruddha Agarwal,&nbsp;Atul Arora,&nbsp;Kanika Aggarwal,&nbsp;Reema Bansal,&nbsp;Deeksha Katoch,&nbsp;Alessandro Marchese,&nbsp;Simar R Singh,&nbsp;Rupesh Agrawal,&nbsp;Vishali Gupta","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the utility of MultiColor confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging (MCI) in identifying the morphology of uveitic lesions compared with conventional color fundus photography (CFP) in patients with posterior uveitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, subjects with posterior uveitis underwent MCI and CFP. The images obtained by the two modalities were analyzed by two independent reviewers for vitreoretinal surface abnormalities, retinal fluid and hemorrhages, and depth/location of lesions. These findings were compared with the clinical findings and other imaging techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine eyes of 43 patients (25 men) with mean age of 33.5 ± 13.9 years were studied. MultiColor imaging had better sensitivity and specificity in detecting vitreoretinal interface abnormalities, such as epiretinal membrane and inner retinal striae, compared with CFP. MultiColor imaging failed to detect retinochoroiditis lesions in 5 of 6 eyes (83%) and choroiditis in 9 46 eyes (20%), which were detected on CFP and clinical examination. Also, MCI showed a high false-positive rate of 34% in detecting intraretinal hemorrhages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Retinochoroidal lesions in posterior uveitis may be poorly identified on MCI compared with CFP and clinical examination. One must exercise caution in commenting on disease morphology based on MCI alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":377573,"journal":{"name":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"1356-1363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MULTICOLOR CONFOCAL SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPE IMAGING IN POSTERIOR UVEITIS.\",\"authors\":\"Kajree Gupta,&nbsp;Aniruddha Agarwal,&nbsp;Atul Arora,&nbsp;Kanika Aggarwal,&nbsp;Reema Bansal,&nbsp;Deeksha Katoch,&nbsp;Alessandro Marchese,&nbsp;Simar R Singh,&nbsp;Rupesh Agrawal,&nbsp;Vishali Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the utility of MultiColor confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging (MCI) in identifying the morphology of uveitic lesions compared with conventional color fundus photography (CFP) in patients with posterior uveitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, subjects with posterior uveitis underwent MCI and CFP. The images obtained by the two modalities were analyzed by two independent reviewers for vitreoretinal surface abnormalities, retinal fluid and hemorrhages, and depth/location of lesions. These findings were compared with the clinical findings and other imaging techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine eyes of 43 patients (25 men) with mean age of 33.5 ± 13.9 years were studied. MultiColor imaging had better sensitivity and specificity in detecting vitreoretinal interface abnormalities, such as epiretinal membrane and inner retinal striae, compared with CFP. MultiColor imaging failed to detect retinochoroiditis lesions in 5 of 6 eyes (83%) and choroiditis in 9 46 eyes (20%), which were detected on CFP and clinical examination. Also, MCI showed a high false-positive rate of 34% in detecting intraretinal hemorrhages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Retinochoroidal lesions in posterior uveitis may be poorly identified on MCI compared with CFP and clinical examination. One must exercise caution in commenting on disease morphology based on MCI alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":377573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1356-1363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨多色共聚焦扫描激光检眼镜成像(MCI)与常规彩色眼底摄影(CFP)在鉴别后葡萄膜炎患者葡萄膜病变形态中的应用价值。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,患有后葡萄膜炎的受试者接受MCI和CFP治疗。两种方式获得的图像由两名独立的审稿人分析玻璃体视网膜表面异常、视网膜液体和出血以及病变的深度/位置。这些发现与临床表现和其他影像学技术进行比较。结果:43例患者69只眼(男25例),平均年龄33.5±13.9岁。与CFP相比,多色成像在检测视网膜前膜、视网膜内纹等玻璃体视网膜界面异常方面具有更好的灵敏度和特异性。6眼彩色显像中有5眼(83%)未检出视网膜脉络膜炎病变,9 46眼(20%)未检出脉络膜炎病变,经CFP和临床检查均检出。MCI检测视网膜出血的假阳性率高达34%。结论:与CFP和临床检查相比,MCI对后葡萄膜炎视网膜脉络膜病变的识别可能较差。在仅根据MCI评价疾病形态时必须谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MULTICOLOR CONFOCAL SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPE IMAGING IN POSTERIOR UVEITIS.

Purpose: To study the utility of MultiColor confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging (MCI) in identifying the morphology of uveitic lesions compared with conventional color fundus photography (CFP) in patients with posterior uveitis.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, subjects with posterior uveitis underwent MCI and CFP. The images obtained by the two modalities were analyzed by two independent reviewers for vitreoretinal surface abnormalities, retinal fluid and hemorrhages, and depth/location of lesions. These findings were compared with the clinical findings and other imaging techniques.

Results: Sixty-nine eyes of 43 patients (25 men) with mean age of 33.5 ± 13.9 years were studied. MultiColor imaging had better sensitivity and specificity in detecting vitreoretinal interface abnormalities, such as epiretinal membrane and inner retinal striae, compared with CFP. MultiColor imaging failed to detect retinochoroiditis lesions in 5 of 6 eyes (83%) and choroiditis in 9 46 eyes (20%), which were detected on CFP and clinical examination. Also, MCI showed a high false-positive rate of 34% in detecting intraretinal hemorrhages.

Conclusion: Retinochoroidal lesions in posterior uveitis may be poorly identified on MCI compared with CFP and clinical examination. One must exercise caution in commenting on disease morphology based on MCI alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信