Richard B Rothman, Michael H Baumann, Bruce E Blough, Arthur E Jacobson, Kenner C Rice, John S Partilla
{"title":"底物诱导的血清素释放非竞争性调节的证据。","authors":"Richard B Rothman, Michael H Baumann, Bruce E Blough, Arthur E Jacobson, Kenner C Rice, John S Partilla","doi":"10.1002/syn.20804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior work indicated that serotonin transporter (SERT) inhibitors competitively inhibit substrate-induced [(3)H]5-HT release, producing rightward shifts in the substrate-dose response curve and increasing the EC(50) value without altering the E(max). We hypothesized that this finding would not generalize across a number of SERT inhibitors and substrates, and that the functional dissociation constant (Ke) of a given SERT inhibitor would not be the same for all tested substrates. To test this hypothesis, we utilized a well-characterized [(3)H]5-HT release assay that measures the ability of a SERT substrate to release preloaded [(3)H]5-HT from rat brain synaptosomes. Dose-response curves were generated for six substrates (PAL-287 [naphthylisopropylamine], (+)-fenfluramine, (+)-norfenfluramine, mCPP [meta-chlorophenylpiperazine], (±)-MDMA, 5-HT) in the absence and presence of a fixed concentration of three SERT inhibitors (indatraline, BW723C86, EG-1-149 [4-(2-(benzhydryloxy)ethyl)-1-(4-bromobenzyl)piperidine oxalate]). Consistent with simple competitive inhibition, all SERT inhibitors increased the EC(50) value of all substrates. However, in many cases a SERT inhibitor decreased the E(max) value as well, indicating that in the presence of the SERT inhibitor the substrate became a partial releaser. Moreover, the Ke values of a given SERT inhibitor differed among the six SERT substrates, indicating that each inhibitor/substrate combination had a unique interaction with the transporter. Viewed collectively, these findings suggest that it may be possible to design SERT inhibitors that differentially regulate SERT function.</p>","PeriodicalId":118978,"journal":{"name":"Synapse (New York, N.y.)","volume":" ","pages":"862-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941209/pdf/nihms205222.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for noncompetitive modulation of substrate-induced serotonin release.\",\"authors\":\"Richard B Rothman, Michael H Baumann, Bruce E Blough, Arthur E Jacobson, Kenner C Rice, John S Partilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/syn.20804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prior work indicated that serotonin transporter (SERT) inhibitors competitively inhibit substrate-induced [(3)H]5-HT release, producing rightward shifts in the substrate-dose response curve and increasing the EC(50) value without altering the E(max). We hypothesized that this finding would not generalize across a number of SERT inhibitors and substrates, and that the functional dissociation constant (Ke) of a given SERT inhibitor would not be the same for all tested substrates. To test this hypothesis, we utilized a well-characterized [(3)H]5-HT release assay that measures the ability of a SERT substrate to release preloaded [(3)H]5-HT from rat brain synaptosomes. Dose-response curves were generated for six substrates (PAL-287 [naphthylisopropylamine], (+)-fenfluramine, (+)-norfenfluramine, mCPP [meta-chlorophenylpiperazine], (±)-MDMA, 5-HT) in the absence and presence of a fixed concentration of three SERT inhibitors (indatraline, BW723C86, EG-1-149 [4-(2-(benzhydryloxy)ethyl)-1-(4-bromobenzyl)piperidine oxalate]). Consistent with simple competitive inhibition, all SERT inhibitors increased the EC(50) value of all substrates. However, in many cases a SERT inhibitor decreased the E(max) value as well, indicating that in the presence of the SERT inhibitor the substrate became a partial releaser. Moreover, the Ke values of a given SERT inhibitor differed among the six SERT substrates, indicating that each inhibitor/substrate combination had a unique interaction with the transporter. Viewed collectively, these findings suggest that it may be possible to design SERT inhibitors that differentially regulate SERT function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":118978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synapse (New York, N.y.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"862-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941209/pdf/nihms205222.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synapse (New York, N.y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.20804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synapse (New York, N.y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.20804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evidence for noncompetitive modulation of substrate-induced serotonin release.
Prior work indicated that serotonin transporter (SERT) inhibitors competitively inhibit substrate-induced [(3)H]5-HT release, producing rightward shifts in the substrate-dose response curve and increasing the EC(50) value without altering the E(max). We hypothesized that this finding would not generalize across a number of SERT inhibitors and substrates, and that the functional dissociation constant (Ke) of a given SERT inhibitor would not be the same for all tested substrates. To test this hypothesis, we utilized a well-characterized [(3)H]5-HT release assay that measures the ability of a SERT substrate to release preloaded [(3)H]5-HT from rat brain synaptosomes. Dose-response curves were generated for six substrates (PAL-287 [naphthylisopropylamine], (+)-fenfluramine, (+)-norfenfluramine, mCPP [meta-chlorophenylpiperazine], (±)-MDMA, 5-HT) in the absence and presence of a fixed concentration of three SERT inhibitors (indatraline, BW723C86, EG-1-149 [4-(2-(benzhydryloxy)ethyl)-1-(4-bromobenzyl)piperidine oxalate]). Consistent with simple competitive inhibition, all SERT inhibitors increased the EC(50) value of all substrates. However, in many cases a SERT inhibitor decreased the E(max) value as well, indicating that in the presence of the SERT inhibitor the substrate became a partial releaser. Moreover, the Ke values of a given SERT inhibitor differed among the six SERT substrates, indicating that each inhibitor/substrate combination had a unique interaction with the transporter. Viewed collectively, these findings suggest that it may be possible to design SERT inhibitors that differentially regulate SERT function.