美国国立卫生研究院科学会议声明:导管原位癌(DCIS)的诊断和管理。

Carmen J Allegra, Denise R Aberle, Pamela Ganschow, Stephen M Hahn, Clara N Lee, Sandra Millon-Underwood, Malcom C Pike, Susan D Reed, Audrey F Saftlas, Susan A Scarvalone, Arnold M Schwartz, Carol Slomski, Greg Yothers, Robin Zon
{"title":"美国国立卫生研究院科学会议声明:导管原位癌(DCIS)的诊断和管理。","authors":"Carmen J Allegra,&nbsp;Denise R Aberle,&nbsp;Pamela Ganschow,&nbsp;Stephen M Hahn,&nbsp;Clara N Lee,&nbsp;Sandra Millon-Underwood,&nbsp;Malcom C Pike,&nbsp;Susan D Reed,&nbsp;Audrey F Saftlas,&nbsp;Susan A Scarvalone,&nbsp;Arnold M Schwartz,&nbsp;Carol Slomski,&nbsp;Greg Yothers,&nbsp;Robin Zon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on the diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>An non-DHHS, nonadvocate 14-member panel representing the fields of fields of oncology, radiology, surgery (general and reconstructive), pathology, radiation oncology, internal medicine, epidemiology, biostatistics, nursing, obstetrics and gynecology, preventative medicine and population health, and social work. In addition, 22 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience.</p><p><strong>Conference process: </strong>The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnosis and management of DCIS is highly complex with many unanswered questions, including the fundamental natural history of untreated disease. Because of the noninvasive nature of DCIS, coupled with its favorable prognosis, strong consideration should be given to remove the anxiety-producing term \"carcinoma\" from the description of DCIS. The outcomes in women treated with available therapies are excellent. Thus, the primary question for future research must focus on the accurate identification of patient subsets diagnosed with DCIS, including those persons who may be managed with less therapeutic intervention without sacrificing the excellent outcomes presently achieved. Essential in this quest will be the development and validation of accurate risk stratification methods based on a comprehensive understanding of the clinical, radiological, pathological, and biological factors associated with DCIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":86986,"journal":{"name":"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements","volume":"26 2","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).\",\"authors\":\"Carmen J Allegra,&nbsp;Denise R Aberle,&nbsp;Pamela Ganschow,&nbsp;Stephen M Hahn,&nbsp;Clara N Lee,&nbsp;Sandra Millon-Underwood,&nbsp;Malcom C Pike,&nbsp;Susan D Reed,&nbsp;Audrey F Saftlas,&nbsp;Susan A Scarvalone,&nbsp;Arnold M Schwartz,&nbsp;Carol Slomski,&nbsp;Greg Yothers,&nbsp;Robin Zon\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on the diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>An non-DHHS, nonadvocate 14-member panel representing the fields of fields of oncology, radiology, surgery (general and reconstructive), pathology, radiation oncology, internal medicine, epidemiology, biostatistics, nursing, obstetrics and gynecology, preventative medicine and population health, and social work. In addition, 22 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience.</p><p><strong>Conference process: </strong>The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnosis and management of DCIS is highly complex with many unanswered questions, including the fundamental natural history of untreated disease. Because of the noninvasive nature of DCIS, coupled with its favorable prognosis, strong consideration should be given to remove the anxiety-producing term \\\"carcinoma\\\" from the description of DCIS. The outcomes in women treated with available therapies are excellent. Thus, the primary question for future research must focus on the accurate identification of patient subsets diagnosed with DCIS, including those persons who may be managed with less therapeutic intervention without sacrificing the excellent outcomes presently achieved. Essential in this quest will be the development and validation of accurate risk stratification methods based on a comprehensive understanding of the clinical, radiological, pathological, and biological factors associated with DCIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":86986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"1-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为医疗保健提供者、患者和公众提供对导管原位癌(DCIS)诊断和管理的现有数据的负责任的评估。参与者:一个非dhhs、非倡导者的14人小组,代表肿瘤学、放射学、外科(普通和重建)、病理学、放射肿瘤学、内科、流行病学、生物统计学、护理学、妇产科学、预防医学和人口健康以及社会工作等领域。此外,来自相关领域的22位专家向小组和会议听众介绍了数据。证据:专家介绍和明尼苏达循证实践中心通过医疗保健研究和质量机构编写的文献系统综述。科学证据优先于轶事经验。会议进程:小组根据公开论坛上提出的科学证据和已发表的科学文献起草了声明。声明草案在会议的最后一天提出,并分发给与会者征求意见。该委员会当天晚些时候在http://consensus.nih.gov上发布了一份修订后的声明。本声明是专家组的独立报告,不是NIH或联邦政府的政策声明。结论:DCIS的诊断和治疗是高度复杂的,有许多未解决的问题,包括未经治疗的疾病的基本自然史。由于DCIS的无创性,再加上其良好的预后,因此在DCIS的描述中应强烈考虑去除引起焦虑的“癌”一词。用现有疗法治疗的妇女的结果非常好。因此,未来研究的主要问题必须集中在准确识别诊断为DCIS的患者亚群,包括那些可以在不牺牲目前取得的优异结果的情况下进行较少治疗干预的患者。这一探索的关键将是基于对与DCIS相关的临床、放射学、病理和生物学因素的全面理解,开发和验证准确的风险分层方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Objective: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on the diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Participants: An non-DHHS, nonadvocate 14-member panel representing the fields of fields of oncology, radiology, surgery (general and reconstructive), pathology, radiation oncology, internal medicine, epidemiology, biostatistics, nursing, obstetrics and gynecology, preventative medicine and population health, and social work. In addition, 22 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience.

Evidence: Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience.

Conference process: The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.

Conclusions: The diagnosis and management of DCIS is highly complex with many unanswered questions, including the fundamental natural history of untreated disease. Because of the noninvasive nature of DCIS, coupled with its favorable prognosis, strong consideration should be given to remove the anxiety-producing term "carcinoma" from the description of DCIS. The outcomes in women treated with available therapies are excellent. Thus, the primary question for future research must focus on the accurate identification of patient subsets diagnosed with DCIS, including those persons who may be managed with less therapeutic intervention without sacrificing the excellent outcomes presently achieved. Essential in this quest will be the development and validation of accurate risk stratification methods based on a comprehensive understanding of the clinical, radiological, pathological, and biological factors associated with DCIS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信