社区团队通过社区-大学伙伴关系实施的循证干预措施的长期保护因素结果。

The Journal of Primary Prevention Pub Date : 2009-09-01 Epub Date: 2009-08-11 DOI:10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5
Cleve Redmond, Richard L Spoth, Chungyeol Shin, Lisa M Schainker, Mark T Greenberg, Mark Feinberg
{"title":"社区团队通过社区-大学伙伴关系实施的循证干预措施的长期保护因素结果。","authors":"Cleve Redmond,&nbsp;Richard L Spoth,&nbsp;Chungyeol Shin,&nbsp;Lisa M Schainker,&nbsp;Mark T Greenberg,&nbsp;Mark Feinberg","doi":"10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is becoming increasingly common for community teams or coalitions to implement programming for children and families designed to promote positive youth development and prevent adolescent problem behaviors. However, there has been only limited rigorous study of the effectiveness of community teams' programming efforts to produce positive outcomes. This study employed a community-level randomized control design to examine protective parent and youth skills outcomes of evidence-based preventive interventions selected from a menu and delivered by community teams supported by a community-university partnership model called PROSPER. Twenty-eight rural communities in two states were randomized across intervention and control conditions. Data were collected through written questionnaires that were completed by approximately 12,000 middle school students in the fall of the 6th grade, prior to intervention delivery, and again in the spring of the 7th, 8th, and 9th grades. Positive intervention effects were found for youth, parent, and family outcomes (e.g., association with antisocial peers, child management, parent-child affective quality) at each post-intervention assessment point. Improvements in these family and youth skill outcomes are expected to support long-term reductions of adolescent problem behaviors, such as substance abuse. EDITORS' STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: In this important and well controlled trial, the authors demonstrate that university partnership-supported community teams, especially when supported with ongoing technical assistance, can continue to produce positive outcomes even after much of the control over delivery of programs is turned over to representatives of the communities in which they are implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":231565,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Primary Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"513-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5","citationCount":"94","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term protective factor outcomes of evidence-based interventions implemented by community teams through a community-university partnership.\",\"authors\":\"Cleve Redmond,&nbsp;Richard L Spoth,&nbsp;Chungyeol Shin,&nbsp;Lisa M Schainker,&nbsp;Mark T Greenberg,&nbsp;Mark Feinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is becoming increasingly common for community teams or coalitions to implement programming for children and families designed to promote positive youth development and prevent adolescent problem behaviors. However, there has been only limited rigorous study of the effectiveness of community teams' programming efforts to produce positive outcomes. This study employed a community-level randomized control design to examine protective parent and youth skills outcomes of evidence-based preventive interventions selected from a menu and delivered by community teams supported by a community-university partnership model called PROSPER. Twenty-eight rural communities in two states were randomized across intervention and control conditions. Data were collected through written questionnaires that were completed by approximately 12,000 middle school students in the fall of the 6th grade, prior to intervention delivery, and again in the spring of the 7th, 8th, and 9th grades. Positive intervention effects were found for youth, parent, and family outcomes (e.g., association with antisocial peers, child management, parent-child affective quality) at each post-intervention assessment point. Improvements in these family and youth skill outcomes are expected to support long-term reductions of adolescent problem behaviors, such as substance abuse. EDITORS' STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: In this important and well controlled trial, the authors demonstrate that university partnership-supported community teams, especially when supported with ongoing technical assistance, can continue to produce positive outcomes even after much of the control over delivery of programs is turned over to representatives of the communities in which they are implemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":231565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Primary Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"513-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5\",\"citationCount\":\"94\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Primary Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Primary Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-009-0189-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 94

摘要

社区团队或联盟为儿童和家庭实施旨在促进青少年积极发展和预防青少年问题行为的方案,这已变得越来越普遍。然而,对于社区团队的规划工作能否产生积极成果的有效性,只有有限的严格研究。本研究采用了社区水平的随机对照设计,以检验从菜单中选择的基于证据的预防干预措施的保护性父母和青少年技能的结果,这些干预措施由社区大学合作模式PROSPER支持的社区团队提供。两个州的28个农村社区被随机分为干预组和对照组。数据是通过书面问卷收集的,这些问卷由大约12,000名中学生在六年级的秋季完成,在干预交付之前,在七年级,八年级和九年级的春季再次完成。在每个干预后评估点,青少年、父母和家庭结果(如与反社会同伴的关联、儿童管理、亲子情感质量)均发现了积极的干预效果。这些家庭和青少年技能成果的改善有望支持青少年问题行为的长期减少,如药物滥用。编辑的战略意义:在这项重要且控制良好的试验中,作者证明,大学伙伴关系支持的社区团队,特别是在持续技术援助的支持下,即使在项目交付的大部分控制权移交给实施项目的社区代表之后,也能继续产生积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term protective factor outcomes of evidence-based interventions implemented by community teams through a community-university partnership.

It is becoming increasingly common for community teams or coalitions to implement programming for children and families designed to promote positive youth development and prevent adolescent problem behaviors. However, there has been only limited rigorous study of the effectiveness of community teams' programming efforts to produce positive outcomes. This study employed a community-level randomized control design to examine protective parent and youth skills outcomes of evidence-based preventive interventions selected from a menu and delivered by community teams supported by a community-university partnership model called PROSPER. Twenty-eight rural communities in two states were randomized across intervention and control conditions. Data were collected through written questionnaires that were completed by approximately 12,000 middle school students in the fall of the 6th grade, prior to intervention delivery, and again in the spring of the 7th, 8th, and 9th grades. Positive intervention effects were found for youth, parent, and family outcomes (e.g., association with antisocial peers, child management, parent-child affective quality) at each post-intervention assessment point. Improvements in these family and youth skill outcomes are expected to support long-term reductions of adolescent problem behaviors, such as substance abuse. EDITORS' STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: In this important and well controlled trial, the authors demonstrate that university partnership-supported community teams, especially when supported with ongoing technical assistance, can continue to produce positive outcomes even after much of the control over delivery of programs is turned over to representatives of the communities in which they are implemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信