我们是否错过了向未来的医生传授女性盆底疾病的机会?

Elizabeth R Mueller, Kimberly Kenton, Rebecca G Rogers, Dee E Fenner
{"title":"我们是否错过了向未来的医生传授女性盆底疾病的机会?","authors":"Elizabeth R Mueller,&nbsp;Kimberly Kenton,&nbsp;Rebecca G Rogers,&nbsp;Dee E Fenner","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-0966-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Many physicians in primary care and medical/surgical specialties will care for female patients with pelvic floor disorders (PFD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was mailed to 266 United States and Canadian clerkship directors that queried how medical students were being educated in PFD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four percent of clerkship directors responded. The mean clerkship size was 105 medical students. Over 97% of third year medical students received lectures on hypertension in pregnancy, normal labor, and abnormal uterine bleeding and at least 90% received lectures on obstetric hemorrhage, placenta previa, and menstruation. Forty percent to 85% of medical students received lectures in PFD depending on the topic. Eighty percent of medical students had no exposure to PFD during their first 2 years of medical school. During their third year, 95% of the students were exposed to PFD topics but only 60% had an opportunity to spend at least a day in an urogynecology practice. Clerkship directors indicate that PFD are relevant to medical student training, however, they have limited time in the clerkship to cover all of the required topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We are missing an important opportunity to educate future clinicians about PFD, which dramatically impact women's quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":" ","pages":"1413-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0966-y","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are we missing an opportunity to teach future physicians about female pelvic floor disorders?\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth R Mueller,&nbsp;Kimberly Kenton,&nbsp;Rebecca G Rogers,&nbsp;Dee E Fenner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-009-0966-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Many physicians in primary care and medical/surgical specialties will care for female patients with pelvic floor disorders (PFD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was mailed to 266 United States and Canadian clerkship directors that queried how medical students were being educated in PFD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four percent of clerkship directors responded. The mean clerkship size was 105 medical students. Over 97% of third year medical students received lectures on hypertension in pregnancy, normal labor, and abnormal uterine bleeding and at least 90% received lectures on obstetric hemorrhage, placenta previa, and menstruation. Forty percent to 85% of medical students received lectures in PFD depending on the topic. Eighty percent of medical students had no exposure to PFD during their first 2 years of medical school. During their third year, 95% of the students were exposed to PFD topics but only 60% had an opportunity to spend at least a day in an urogynecology practice. Clerkship directors indicate that PFD are relevant to medical student training, however, they have limited time in the clerkship to cover all of the required topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We are missing an important opportunity to educate future clinicians about PFD, which dramatically impact women's quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1413-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0966-y\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0966-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0966-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

介绍和假设:许多初级保健和内科/外科专业的医生会照顾患有盆底疾病(PFD)的女性患者。方法:对266名美国和加拿大的实习主任进行邮寄调查,询问医学生如何接受PFD的教育。结果:44%的职员主管做出了回应。平均见习人数为105名医学生。超过97%的三年级医学生接受了关于妊娠高血压、正常分娩和子宫异常出血的讲座,至少90%的学生接受了关于产科出血、前置胎盘和月经的讲座。40%到85%的医科学生接受过PFD的讲座,这取决于主题。80%的医学生在医学院的前两年没有接触过PFD。在第三年,95%的学生接触过PFD主题,但只有60%的学生有机会在泌尿妇科实践中度过至少一天。见习主任指出,PFD与医学生培训相关,但是,他们在见习期间的时间有限,无法涵盖所有要求的主题。结论:我们错过了一个重要的机会来教育未来的临床医生关于PFD,这极大地影响了女性的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are we missing an opportunity to teach future physicians about female pelvic floor disorders?

Introduction and hypothesis: Many physicians in primary care and medical/surgical specialties will care for female patients with pelvic floor disorders (PFD).

Methods: A survey was mailed to 266 United States and Canadian clerkship directors that queried how medical students were being educated in PFD.

Results: Forty-four percent of clerkship directors responded. The mean clerkship size was 105 medical students. Over 97% of third year medical students received lectures on hypertension in pregnancy, normal labor, and abnormal uterine bleeding and at least 90% received lectures on obstetric hemorrhage, placenta previa, and menstruation. Forty percent to 85% of medical students received lectures in PFD depending on the topic. Eighty percent of medical students had no exposure to PFD during their first 2 years of medical school. During their third year, 95% of the students were exposed to PFD topics but only 60% had an opportunity to spend at least a day in an urogynecology practice. Clerkship directors indicate that PFD are relevant to medical student training, however, they have limited time in the clerkship to cover all of the required topics.

Conclusions: We are missing an important opportunity to educate future clinicians about PFD, which dramatically impact women's quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信