[袖状肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的安全性和长期疗效]。

Ming-Ran Xie, Xu Zhang, Peng Lin, Jie-Xin Chen, Yong-Bin Ling, Jian-Hua Fu, Tie-Hua Rong, Can-Guang Zeng, Zhi-Fan Huang
{"title":"[袖状肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的安全性和长期疗效]。","authors":"Ming-Ran Xie,&nbsp;Xu Zhang,&nbsp;Peng Lin,&nbsp;Jie-Xin Chen,&nbsp;Yong-Bin Ling,&nbsp;Jian-Hua Fu,&nbsp;Tie-Hua Rong,&nbsp;Can-Guang Zeng,&nbsp;Zhi-Fan Huang","doi":"10.5732/cjc.009.10028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pneumonectomy has been long term used as the standard surgical procedure for central type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sleeve lobectomy has been performed in a small number of patients meeting the indications. This study was to compare the 5-year survival rate, operation related complications and mortality of sleeve lobectomy with pneumonectomy for NSCLC, and evaluate sleeve lobectomy in the surgical treatment for NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three patients with NSCLC undergoing sleeve lobectomy (group A) and 571 patients with NSCLC undergoing pneumonectomy (group B) from January 1997 to December 2007 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were reviewed. The 5-year survival rate, operation related complications and mortality between the two groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall 5-year survival for group A and group B were 42.0% and 31.5%, respectively (P=0.015). In the subgroup analysis, the 5-year survival of N0 (P=0.007) and N1 (P=0.025) patients were significant higher in group A than in group B, while the survival were not significantly different between N2 patients (P=0.073). The 5-year survival rates for bronchial and pulmonary arterial sleeve resection (the subset of group A) and pneumonectomy were not significantly different (P=0.092). There was no significant difference in local recurrences between the groups (P=0.821). The postoperative complication rates were 11.8% in group A and 20.7% in group B (P=0.046). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups (P=0.259).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The operative safety and long term efficacy of sleeve lobectomy are superior to pneumonectomy for NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7559,"journal":{"name":"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer","volume":" ","pages":"868-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Safety and long-term outcome of sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer].\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Ran Xie,&nbsp;Xu Zhang,&nbsp;Peng Lin,&nbsp;Jie-Xin Chen,&nbsp;Yong-Bin Ling,&nbsp;Jian-Hua Fu,&nbsp;Tie-Hua Rong,&nbsp;Can-Guang Zeng,&nbsp;Zhi-Fan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.5732/cjc.009.10028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pneumonectomy has been long term used as the standard surgical procedure for central type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sleeve lobectomy has been performed in a small number of patients meeting the indications. This study was to compare the 5-year survival rate, operation related complications and mortality of sleeve lobectomy with pneumonectomy for NSCLC, and evaluate sleeve lobectomy in the surgical treatment for NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three patients with NSCLC undergoing sleeve lobectomy (group A) and 571 patients with NSCLC undergoing pneumonectomy (group B) from January 1997 to December 2007 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were reviewed. The 5-year survival rate, operation related complications and mortality between the two groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall 5-year survival for group A and group B were 42.0% and 31.5%, respectively (P=0.015). In the subgroup analysis, the 5-year survival of N0 (P=0.007) and N1 (P=0.025) patients were significant higher in group A than in group B, while the survival were not significantly different between N2 patients (P=0.073). The 5-year survival rates for bronchial and pulmonary arterial sleeve resection (the subset of group A) and pneumonectomy were not significantly different (P=0.092). There was no significant difference in local recurrences between the groups (P=0.821). The postoperative complication rates were 11.8% in group A and 20.7% in group B (P=0.046). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups (P=0.259).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The operative safety and long term efficacy of sleeve lobectomy are superior to pneumonectomy for NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"868-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.009.10028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.009.10028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的:全肺切除术长期以来一直被用作治疗中心型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准手术方法。在少数符合适应症的患者中进行了袖状肺叶切除术。本研究旨在比较套筒肺叶切除术与全肺切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的5年生存率、手术相关并发症及死亡率,评价套筒肺叶切除术在非小细胞肺癌手术治疗中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析1997年1月至2007年12月中山大学肿瘤中心行套筒肺叶切除术的93例非小细胞肺癌患者(A组)和行全肺切除术的571例非小细胞肺癌患者(B组)。分析两组患者的5年生存率、手术并发症及死亡率。结果:A、B组患者5年总生存率分别为42.0%、31.5% (P=0.015)。亚组分析中,A组N0 (P=0.007)和N1 (P=0.025)患者的5年生存率显著高于B组,N2组患者的5年生存率无显著差异(P=0.073)。支气管、肺动脉套筒切除术(A组亚组)与全肺切除术的5年生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.092)。两组局部复发率差异无统计学意义(P=0.821)。A组术后并发症发生率为11.8%,B组为20.7% (P=0.046)。两组患者死亡率差异无统计学意义(P=0.259)。结论:套筒肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的手术安全性和远期疗效优于全肺切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Safety and long-term outcome of sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer].

Background and objective: Pneumonectomy has been long term used as the standard surgical procedure for central type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sleeve lobectomy has been performed in a small number of patients meeting the indications. This study was to compare the 5-year survival rate, operation related complications and mortality of sleeve lobectomy with pneumonectomy for NSCLC, and evaluate sleeve lobectomy in the surgical treatment for NSCLC.

Methods: Ninety-three patients with NSCLC undergoing sleeve lobectomy (group A) and 571 patients with NSCLC undergoing pneumonectomy (group B) from January 1997 to December 2007 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were reviewed. The 5-year survival rate, operation related complications and mortality between the two groups were analyzed.

Results: The overall 5-year survival for group A and group B were 42.0% and 31.5%, respectively (P=0.015). In the subgroup analysis, the 5-year survival of N0 (P=0.007) and N1 (P=0.025) patients were significant higher in group A than in group B, while the survival were not significantly different between N2 patients (P=0.073). The 5-year survival rates for bronchial and pulmonary arterial sleeve resection (the subset of group A) and pneumonectomy were not significantly different (P=0.092). There was no significant difference in local recurrences between the groups (P=0.821). The postoperative complication rates were 11.8% in group A and 20.7% in group B (P=0.046). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups (P=0.259).

Conclusion: The operative safety and long term efficacy of sleeve lobectomy are superior to pneumonectomy for NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信