{"title":"的”一词(παρισóτης,adaequatio)和Diophant Fermat .","authors":"Ulrich Felgner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>'Adequality' is an essential step in Fermat's method of finding maxima, minima, tangents, centers of gravity etc. However, it seems to be an enigma what this method really consists of. It is usually understood that a convincing interpretation would require some elements of approximation or (infinitesimal?) smallness, although such elements cannot be found in Fermat's writings. \n\nWe shall present a reading which is based on Fermat's frequent use of the, less-than'-relation when either a maximal point on a given curve or a point on a tangent outside the curve is considered. In all applications of his method Fermat constructs certain additional polynomials (h) which have the form (h) = hψ(h) and shows that (h) is strictly positive in a certain neighbourhood of 0 for h ≠ 0. This is the core of the fermatian method of, adequality'. It allows one to conclude that (h) has a double root at h = 0 and hence the constant term c of ψ(h) must be zero. In this way Fermat passes from, adequality' to, equality', hoping that the equation c = 0 yields enough information to arrive at a solution of the problem under consideration. It is clear that infinitesimal arguments are not needed in this reading of the fermatian method, and that the only mathematical techniques used herein were available at Fermat's time. In addition the mathematics of Fermat becomes clear and correct. \n\nWe also carefully analyze the source of Fermat's method of adequality, namely the 'p a r i s ó t ē s ' of Diophantus.</p>","PeriodicalId":76565,"journal":{"name":"Sudhoffs Archiv","volume":"100 1","pages":"83-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der Begriff der ,Angleichung' (παρισóτης, adaequatio) bei Diophant und Fermat.\",\"authors\":\"Ulrich Felgner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>'Adequality' is an essential step in Fermat's method of finding maxima, minima, tangents, centers of gravity etc. However, it seems to be an enigma what this method really consists of. It is usually understood that a convincing interpretation would require some elements of approximation or (infinitesimal?) smallness, although such elements cannot be found in Fermat's writings. \\n\\nWe shall present a reading which is based on Fermat's frequent use of the, less-than'-relation when either a maximal point on a given curve or a point on a tangent outside the curve is considered. In all applications of his method Fermat constructs certain additional polynomials (h) which have the form (h) = hψ(h) and shows that (h) is strictly positive in a certain neighbourhood of 0 for h ≠ 0. This is the core of the fermatian method of, adequality'. It allows one to conclude that (h) has a double root at h = 0 and hence the constant term c of ψ(h) must be zero. In this way Fermat passes from, adequality' to, equality', hoping that the equation c = 0 yields enough information to arrive at a solution of the problem under consideration. It is clear that infinitesimal arguments are not needed in this reading of the fermatian method, and that the only mathematical techniques used herein were available at Fermat's time. In addition the mathematics of Fermat becomes clear and correct. \\n\\nWe also carefully analyze the source of Fermat's method of adequality, namely the 'p a r i s ó t ē s ' of Diophantus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sudhoffs Archiv\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"83-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sudhoffs Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudhoffs Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在费马寻找最大值、最小值、切线、重心等的方法中,“适足性”是必不可少的一步。然而,这个方法到底是由什么组成的似乎是一个谜。人们通常认为,一个令人信服的解释需要一些近似或(无穷小?)小的元素,尽管这些元素在费马的著作中找不到。当考虑给定曲线上的最大值点或曲线外切线上的点时,我们将根据费马经常使用的小于-关系提出一种解读。在他的方法的所有应用中,费马构造了若干形式为(h) = hψ(h)的附加多项式(h),并证明了(h)在h≠0时,在0的某一邻域中是严格正的。这是费马法的核心,“足够”。它允许我们得出结论,(h)在h = 0处有一个二重根,因此ψ(h)的常数项c一定是零。费马就这样从“足够”过渡到“相等”,希望方程c = 0能提供足够的信息,从而得出所考虑问题的解。很明显,在费马方法的阅读中不需要无穷小的参数,而且这里使用的唯一数学技术在费马的时代是可用的。此外,费马的数学变得清晰和正确。我们还仔细分析了费马的充分性方法的来源,即丢番图的“p ar i s ó t´s”。
Der Begriff der ,Angleichung' (παρισóτης, adaequatio) bei Diophant und Fermat.
'Adequality' is an essential step in Fermat's method of finding maxima, minima, tangents, centers of gravity etc. However, it seems to be an enigma what this method really consists of. It is usually understood that a convincing interpretation would require some elements of approximation or (infinitesimal?) smallness, although such elements cannot be found in Fermat's writings.
We shall present a reading which is based on Fermat's frequent use of the, less-than'-relation when either a maximal point on a given curve or a point on a tangent outside the curve is considered. In all applications of his method Fermat constructs certain additional polynomials (h) which have the form (h) = hψ(h) and shows that (h) is strictly positive in a certain neighbourhood of 0 for h ≠ 0. This is the core of the fermatian method of, adequality'. It allows one to conclude that (h) has a double root at h = 0 and hence the constant term c of ψ(h) must be zero. In this way Fermat passes from, adequality' to, equality', hoping that the equation c = 0 yields enough information to arrive at a solution of the problem under consideration. It is clear that infinitesimal arguments are not needed in this reading of the fermatian method, and that the only mathematical techniques used herein were available at Fermat's time. In addition the mathematics of Fermat becomes clear and correct.
We also carefully analyze the source of Fermat's method of adequality, namely the 'p a r i s ó t ē s ' of Diophantus.