4种免疫组织化学磷酸组蛋白H3抗体标记乳腺癌有丝分裂象的性能。

Cornelia M Focke, Kai Finsterbusch, Thomas Decker, Paul J van Diest
{"title":"4种免疫组织化学磷酸组蛋白H3抗体标记乳腺癌有丝分裂象的性能。","authors":"Cornelia M Focke,&nbsp;Kai Finsterbusch,&nbsp;Thomas Decker,&nbsp;Paul J van Diest","doi":"10.1097/PAI.0000000000000390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) has been suggested to facilitate and improve mitotic activity assessment in breast cancer and other tumor entities, but the reliability of respective immunohistochemical antibodies has not yet been compared for routine purposes. Our aim was to test the performance of 4 different PHH3 antibodies on a series of highly proliferating breast cancers with good preservation of morphology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four commercially available PHH3 antibodies were tested on 9 grade 3 invasive breast cancers processed in the same batch. We analyzed the number of antibody stained and nonstained mitotic figures as well as the total of cells observed in 10 high power fields per tumor to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the respective antibodies for staining mitotic figures, taking morphologically defined mitotic figures as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the respective PHH3 antibodies for staining mitotic figures were 54.51%, 99.98%, and 98.79% for Cell Marque, 87.48%, 67.62%, and 67.47% for Epitomics, 98.62%, 99.73%, and 99.49% for Merck 06-570, and 99.74%, 99.52%, and 99.51% for Merck 09-797, respectively. Sensitivity was lowest for telophase. In statistical analysis, the Cell Marque antibody demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity and Epitomics substantially lower sensitivity and specificity than Merck 06-570 and Merck 09-797 antibodies (P<0.0001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performance and reliability varied significantly between the 4 tested antibodies. For faster identification of mitotic hot spots and as potential marker in digital image analysis, the Merck antibodies seem to be most suitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":520562,"journal":{"name":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","volume":" ","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000390","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of 4 Immunohistochemical Phosphohistone H3 Antibodies for Marking Mitotic Figures in Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Cornelia M Focke,&nbsp;Kai Finsterbusch,&nbsp;Thomas Decker,&nbsp;Paul J van Diest\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAI.0000000000000390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) has been suggested to facilitate and improve mitotic activity assessment in breast cancer and other tumor entities, but the reliability of respective immunohistochemical antibodies has not yet been compared for routine purposes. Our aim was to test the performance of 4 different PHH3 antibodies on a series of highly proliferating breast cancers with good preservation of morphology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four commercially available PHH3 antibodies were tested on 9 grade 3 invasive breast cancers processed in the same batch. We analyzed the number of antibody stained and nonstained mitotic figures as well as the total of cells observed in 10 high power fields per tumor to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the respective antibodies for staining mitotic figures, taking morphologically defined mitotic figures as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the respective PHH3 antibodies for staining mitotic figures were 54.51%, 99.98%, and 98.79% for Cell Marque, 87.48%, 67.62%, and 67.47% for Epitomics, 98.62%, 99.73%, and 99.49% for Merck 06-570, and 99.74%, 99.52%, and 99.51% for Merck 09-797, respectively. Sensitivity was lowest for telophase. In statistical analysis, the Cell Marque antibody demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity and Epitomics substantially lower sensitivity and specificity than Merck 06-570 and Merck 09-797 antibodies (P<0.0001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performance and reliability varied significantly between the 4 tested antibodies. For faster identification of mitotic hot spots and as potential marker in digital image analysis, the Merck antibodies seem to be most suitable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000390\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:磷酸组蛋白H3 (PHH3)已被认为可以促进和改善乳腺癌和其他肿瘤实体的有丝分裂活性评估,但各自的免疫组织化学抗体的可靠性尚未在常规目的中进行比较。我们的目的是测试4种不同的PHH3抗体在一系列高度增殖的乳腺癌上的性能,这些乳腺癌具有良好的形态学保存。方法:采用4种市售PHH3抗体对同批次9例3级浸润性乳腺癌进行检测。我们分析了抗体染色和未染色的有丝分裂图的数量以及每个肿瘤在10个高倍视野下观察到的细胞总数,以形态学定义的有丝分裂图为金标准,计算了各自抗体染色有丝分裂图的灵敏度、特异性和准确性。结果:分别检测PHH3抗体染色有丝分裂图的灵敏度、特异性和准确性Cell Marque分别为54.51%、99.98%和98.79%,Epitomics分别为87.48%、67.62%和67.47%,默克06-570分别为98.62%、99.73%和99.49%,默克09-797分别为99.74%、99.52%和99.51%。晚期敏感性最低。统计分析表明,Cell Marque抗体的敏感性和特异性明显低于Merck 06-570和Merck 09-797抗体(p结论:4种抗体的性能和可靠性差异显著)。对于有丝分裂热点的快速识别和作为数字图像分析的潜在标记物,默克公司的抗体似乎是最合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of 4 Immunohistochemical Phosphohistone H3 Antibodies for Marking Mitotic Figures in Breast Cancer.

Background: Phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) has been suggested to facilitate and improve mitotic activity assessment in breast cancer and other tumor entities, but the reliability of respective immunohistochemical antibodies has not yet been compared for routine purposes. Our aim was to test the performance of 4 different PHH3 antibodies on a series of highly proliferating breast cancers with good preservation of morphology.

Methods: Four commercially available PHH3 antibodies were tested on 9 grade 3 invasive breast cancers processed in the same batch. We analyzed the number of antibody stained and nonstained mitotic figures as well as the total of cells observed in 10 high power fields per tumor to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the respective antibodies for staining mitotic figures, taking morphologically defined mitotic figures as gold standard.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the respective PHH3 antibodies for staining mitotic figures were 54.51%, 99.98%, and 98.79% for Cell Marque, 87.48%, 67.62%, and 67.47% for Epitomics, 98.62%, 99.73%, and 99.49% for Merck 06-570, and 99.74%, 99.52%, and 99.51% for Merck 09-797, respectively. Sensitivity was lowest for telophase. In statistical analysis, the Cell Marque antibody demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity and Epitomics substantially lower sensitivity and specificity than Merck 06-570 and Merck 09-797 antibodies (P<0.0001, respectively).

Conclusions: Performance and reliability varied significantly between the 4 tested antibodies. For faster identification of mitotic hot spots and as potential marker in digital image analysis, the Merck antibodies seem to be most suitable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信