Alice Josephine Fauci, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, Daniela D'Angelo, Annalisa Biffi, Greta Castellini, Silvia Gianola, Laura Iacorossi, Roberto Latina, Gloria Porcu, Katia Salomone, Osvaldo Chiara, Primiano Iannone
{"title":"意大利国立卫生研究院重大创伤综合管理临床实践指南:过程和方法。","authors":"Alice Josephine Fauci, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, Daniela D'Angelo, Annalisa Biffi, Greta Castellini, Silvia Gianola, Laura Iacorossi, Roberto Latina, Gloria Porcu, Katia Salomone, Osvaldo Chiara, Primiano Iannone","doi":"10.4415/ANN_21_04_09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major trauma describes serious injuries requiring lifesaving interventions or resulting in long-term disability; it represents about 8% of all deaths worldwide. Specific guidelines can help reduce deaths and disabilities, provided they adhere to high quality and trustworthiness standards. This article aims at introducing the development process of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS (Italian National Institute of Health) guideline for major trauma integrated management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the ISS methodological standards including the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scope was formulated by the multidisciplinary panel with stakeholders' involvement; two guidelines were identified as appropriate sources for adolopment. Forty questions from the two source guidelines were prioritised and five new ones formulated. New systematic reviews or updates were conducted for each clinical question, Evidence to Decision frameworks developed or re-assessed and the recommendations formulated after public consultations and external review. The policy on conflicts of interest was applied throughout the process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through a broad expertise representation, the early and wide stakeholders' participation, a continual process for disclosure and management of conflict of interests and the transparency of the process, ISS standards are proving to be an efficient model for developing trustworthy clinical guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8246,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"57 4","pages":"343-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical practice guideline for the integrated management of major trauma by the Italian National Institute of Health: process and methods.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Josephine Fauci, Daniela Coclite, Antonello Napoletano, Daniela D'Angelo, Annalisa Biffi, Greta Castellini, Silvia Gianola, Laura Iacorossi, Roberto Latina, Gloria Porcu, Katia Salomone, Osvaldo Chiara, Primiano Iannone\",\"doi\":\"10.4415/ANN_21_04_09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major trauma describes serious injuries requiring lifesaving interventions or resulting in long-term disability; it represents about 8% of all deaths worldwide. Specific guidelines can help reduce deaths and disabilities, provided they adhere to high quality and trustworthiness standards. This article aims at introducing the development process of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS (Italian National Institute of Health) guideline for major trauma integrated management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the ISS methodological standards including the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scope was formulated by the multidisciplinary panel with stakeholders' involvement; two guidelines were identified as appropriate sources for adolopment. Forty questions from the two source guidelines were prioritised and five new ones formulated. New systematic reviews or updates were conducted for each clinical question, Evidence to Decision frameworks developed or re-assessed and the recommendations formulated after public consultations and external review. The policy on conflicts of interest was applied throughout the process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through a broad expertise representation, the early and wide stakeholders' participation, a continual process for disclosure and management of conflict of interests and the transparency of the process, ISS standards are proving to be an efficient model for developing trustworthy clinical guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"343-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_21_04_09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_21_04_09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
背景:重大创伤描述需要挽救生命的干预措施或导致长期残疾的严重伤害;它约占全球死亡人数的8%。具体的准则可以帮助减少死亡和残疾,只要它们遵守高质量和可信赖的标准。本文旨在介绍意大利国立卫生研究院(Istituto Superiore di sanit)重大创伤综合管理指南的制定过程。方法:我们应用ISS方法标准,包括grade - adolopdevelopment方法来采用、适应和重新开发值得信赖的指南。结果:范围由多学科小组在利益相关者的参与下制定;确定了两项准则作为适当的发展来源。两个来源准则中的40个问题被列为优先事项,并制定了5个新问题。对每个临床问题进行了新的系统评价或更新,制定或重新评估了决策证据框架,并在公众咨询和外部审查后制定了建议。有关利益冲突的政策贯穿整个过程。结论:通过广泛的专业知识代表,早期和广泛的利益相关者参与,利益冲突的持续披露和管理过程以及过程的透明度,ISS标准被证明是开发值得信赖的临床指导的有效模式。
Clinical practice guideline for the integrated management of major trauma by the Italian National Institute of Health: process and methods.
Background: Major trauma describes serious injuries requiring lifesaving interventions or resulting in long-term disability; it represents about 8% of all deaths worldwide. Specific guidelines can help reduce deaths and disabilities, provided they adhere to high quality and trustworthiness standards. This article aims at introducing the development process of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS (Italian National Institute of Health) guideline for major trauma integrated management.
Methods: We applied the ISS methodological standards including the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy guidelines.
Results: The scope was formulated by the multidisciplinary panel with stakeholders' involvement; two guidelines were identified as appropriate sources for adolopment. Forty questions from the two source guidelines were prioritised and five new ones formulated. New systematic reviews or updates were conducted for each clinical question, Evidence to Decision frameworks developed or re-assessed and the recommendations formulated after public consultations and external review. The policy on conflicts of interest was applied throughout the process.
Conclusions: Through a broad expertise representation, the early and wide stakeholders' participation, a continual process for disclosure and management of conflict of interests and the transparency of the process, ISS standards are proving to be an efficient model for developing trustworthy clinical guidance.
期刊介绍:
Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità is a peer reviewed quarterly science journal which publishes research articles in biomedicine, translational research and in many other disciplines of the health sciences. The journal includes the following material: original articles, reviews, commentaries, editorials, brief and technical notes, book reviews.
The publication of Monographic Sections has been discontinued. In case you wish to present a small number of coordinated contributions on specific themes concerning priorities in public health, please contact the Editorial office.
The journal is in English.