孤立的再手术三尖瓣手术:结果和风险评估。

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Pub Date : 2022-01-05 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1286
Tahir I Mohamed, Omar J Baqal, Abdulaziz A Binzaid, Hussam T AlHennawi, Abdulrahman R Barakeh, Omar M Mrayati, Aly M Alsanei
{"title":"孤立的再手术三尖瓣手术:结果和风险评估。","authors":"Tahir I Mohamed,&nbsp;Omar J Baqal,&nbsp;Abdulaziz A Binzaid,&nbsp;Hussam T AlHennawi,&nbsp;Abdulrahman R Barakeh,&nbsp;Omar M Mrayati,&nbsp;Aly M Alsanei","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe patient characteristics and post-operative outcomes, including early and late mortality, defined by death within 30 days and after 30 days post-surgery, respectively, as well as 20-year survival after isolated reoperative tricuspid surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 169 patients who underwent isolated reoperative tricuspid valve surgery at our institution (between 1997 and 2000) and describe post-surgical outcomes including intraoperative, early and late mortality. All patients included completed 21 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of our patients were females 147 (87%) with the mean age of 45.9 ± 12.9 years. The mean body mass index (BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup>) was 27.4 ± 6.0. Previous cardiac surgeries included tricuspid valve surgeries in 169 (100%) patients, with bioprosthetic valves, mechanical valves, annual rings and tricuspid repair surgeries utilized in 37 (21.9%), 21 (12.4%), 38 (22.4%) and 73 (43.2%) patients, respectively. The indication for previous tricuspid surgery was rheumatic heart disease in 154 (91.5%) patients.The most common cause of reoperative valvular surgery was tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in 139 (82.2%), with 66% of patients having severe TR. Other reasons for reoperative surgery included tricuspid stenosis 22 (13%) and dehiscence 8 (4.7%). For the redo surgery, 125 (74%) patients underwent Tricuspid Valve Replacement (TVR), 90 (53%) of whom received bioprosthetic valves while 35 (21%) received mechanical valves. Forty-four patients (26%) underwent Tricuspid Valve Repair. Mortality within 30 days of surgery was 11.3% (20 patients) and 11.4% after 30 days, with 20 years survival being about 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our experience, reoperation for failed isolated tricuspid valve replacement or repair was associated with reasonable mortality and good survival rate over long period of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"33 4","pages":"366-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7a/53/sha-366-373.PMC8765034.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolated Reoperative Tricuspid Valve Surgery: Outcomes and Risk Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Tahir I Mohamed,&nbsp;Omar J Baqal,&nbsp;Abdulaziz A Binzaid,&nbsp;Hussam T AlHennawi,&nbsp;Abdulrahman R Barakeh,&nbsp;Omar M Mrayati,&nbsp;Aly M Alsanei\",\"doi\":\"10.37616/2212-5043.1286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe patient characteristics and post-operative outcomes, including early and late mortality, defined by death within 30 days and after 30 days post-surgery, respectively, as well as 20-year survival after isolated reoperative tricuspid surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 169 patients who underwent isolated reoperative tricuspid valve surgery at our institution (between 1997 and 2000) and describe post-surgical outcomes including intraoperative, early and late mortality. All patients included completed 21 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of our patients were females 147 (87%) with the mean age of 45.9 ± 12.9 years. The mean body mass index (BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup>) was 27.4 ± 6.0. Previous cardiac surgeries included tricuspid valve surgeries in 169 (100%) patients, with bioprosthetic valves, mechanical valves, annual rings and tricuspid repair surgeries utilized in 37 (21.9%), 21 (12.4%), 38 (22.4%) and 73 (43.2%) patients, respectively. The indication for previous tricuspid surgery was rheumatic heart disease in 154 (91.5%) patients.The most common cause of reoperative valvular surgery was tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in 139 (82.2%), with 66% of patients having severe TR. Other reasons for reoperative surgery included tricuspid stenosis 22 (13%) and dehiscence 8 (4.7%). For the redo surgery, 125 (74%) patients underwent Tricuspid Valve Replacement (TVR), 90 (53%) of whom received bioprosthetic valves while 35 (21%) received mechanical valves. Forty-four patients (26%) underwent Tricuspid Valve Repair. Mortality within 30 days of surgery was 11.3% (20 patients) and 11.4% after 30 days, with 20 years survival being about 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our experience, reoperation for failed isolated tricuspid valve replacement or repair was associated with reasonable mortality and good survival rate over long period of time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"366-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7a/53/sha-366-373.PMC8765034.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述患者特征和术后结局,包括早期和晚期死亡率,分别以术后30天内和30天后的死亡定义,以及孤立三尖瓣再手术后20年的生存率。方法:我们回顾性分析了我院(1997年至2000年间)169例再手术三尖瓣手术患者,并描述了术后结果,包括术中死亡率、早期死亡率和晚期死亡率。所有患者均完成了21年的随访。结果:患者以女性147例(87%)为主,平均年龄45.9±12.9岁。平均体重指数(BMI, kg/m2)为27.4±6.0。既往心脏手术包括三尖瓣手术169例(100%),生物瓣膜37例(21.9%),机械瓣膜21例(12.4%),年轮38例(22.4%),三尖瓣修复手术73例(43.2%)。154例(91.5%)患者既往三尖瓣手术指征为风湿性心脏病。再次行瓣膜手术最常见的原因是三尖瓣返流(TR) 139例(82.2%),其中66%的患者有严重的TR,其他原因包括三尖瓣狭窄22例(13%)和裂裂8例(4.7%)。在重做手术中,125例(74%)患者接受了三尖瓣置换术(TVR), 90例(53%)患者接受了生物假体瓣膜,35例(21%)患者接受了机械瓣膜。44例(26%)患者行三尖瓣修复术。手术30天内死亡率为11.3%(20例),术后30天死亡率为11.4%,20年生存率约为80%。结论:根据我们的经验,离体三尖瓣置换术或修复失败的再手术死亡率合理,长期生存率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Isolated Reoperative Tricuspid Valve Surgery: Outcomes and Risk Assessment.

Isolated Reoperative Tricuspid Valve Surgery: Outcomes and Risk Assessment.

Isolated Reoperative Tricuspid Valve Surgery: Outcomes and Risk Assessment.

Objective: To describe patient characteristics and post-operative outcomes, including early and late mortality, defined by death within 30 days and after 30 days post-surgery, respectively, as well as 20-year survival after isolated reoperative tricuspid surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 169 patients who underwent isolated reoperative tricuspid valve surgery at our institution (between 1997 and 2000) and describe post-surgical outcomes including intraoperative, early and late mortality. All patients included completed 21 years of follow-up.

Results: The majority of our patients were females 147 (87%) with the mean age of 45.9 ± 12.9 years. The mean body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was 27.4 ± 6.0. Previous cardiac surgeries included tricuspid valve surgeries in 169 (100%) patients, with bioprosthetic valves, mechanical valves, annual rings and tricuspid repair surgeries utilized in 37 (21.9%), 21 (12.4%), 38 (22.4%) and 73 (43.2%) patients, respectively. The indication for previous tricuspid surgery was rheumatic heart disease in 154 (91.5%) patients.The most common cause of reoperative valvular surgery was tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in 139 (82.2%), with 66% of patients having severe TR. Other reasons for reoperative surgery included tricuspid stenosis 22 (13%) and dehiscence 8 (4.7%). For the redo surgery, 125 (74%) patients underwent Tricuspid Valve Replacement (TVR), 90 (53%) of whom received bioprosthetic valves while 35 (21%) received mechanical valves. Forty-four patients (26%) underwent Tricuspid Valve Repair. Mortality within 30 days of surgery was 11.3% (20 patients) and 11.4% after 30 days, with 20 years survival being about 80%.

Conclusions: Based on our experience, reoperation for failed isolated tricuspid valve replacement or repair was associated with reasonable mortality and good survival rate over long period of time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信