新一代Apple Watch对脊髓损伤轮椅使用者的活动测量性能

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Methods of Information in Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740236
Nils-Hendrik Benning, Petra Knaup, Rüdiger Rupp
{"title":"新一代Apple Watch对脊髓损伤轮椅使用者的活动测量性能","authors":"Nils-Hendrik Benning,&nbsp;Petra Knaup,&nbsp;Rüdiger Rupp","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The level of physical activity (PA) of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) has an impact on long-term complications. Currently, PA is mostly assessed by interviews. Wearable activity trackers are promising tools to objectively measure PA under everyday conditions. The only off-the-shelf, wearable activity tracker with specific measures for wheelchair users is the Apple Watch.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study analyzes the measurement performance of Apple Watch Series 4 for wheelchair users and compares it with an earlier generation of the device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen participants with subacute SCI during their first in-patient phase followed a test course using their wheelchair. The number of wheelchair pushes was counted manually by visual inspection and with the Apple Watch. Difference between the Apple Watch and the rater was analyzed with mean absolute percent error (MAPE) and a Bland-Altman plot. To compare the measurement error of Series 4 and an older generation of the device a <i>t</i>-test was calculated using data for Series 1 from a former study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average of differences was 12.33 pushes (<i>n</i> = 15), whereas participants pushed the wheelchair 138.4 times on average (range 86-271 pushes). The range of difference and the Bland-Altman plot indicate an overestimation by Apple Watch. MAPE is 9.20% and the <i>t</i>-test, testing for an effect of Series 4 on the percentage of error compared with Series 1, was significant with <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Series 4 shows a significant improvement in measurement performance compared with Series 1. Series 4 can be considered as a promising data source to capture the number of wheelchair pushes on even grounds. Future research should analyze the long-term measurement performance during everyday conditions of Series 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e103-e110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714299/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Performance of Activity Measurements with Newer Generation of Apple Watch in Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Nils-Hendrik Benning,&nbsp;Petra Knaup,&nbsp;Rüdiger Rupp\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1740236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The level of physical activity (PA) of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) has an impact on long-term complications. Currently, PA is mostly assessed by interviews. Wearable activity trackers are promising tools to objectively measure PA under everyday conditions. The only off-the-shelf, wearable activity tracker with specific measures for wheelchair users is the Apple Watch.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study analyzes the measurement performance of Apple Watch Series 4 for wheelchair users and compares it with an earlier generation of the device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen participants with subacute SCI during their first in-patient phase followed a test course using their wheelchair. The number of wheelchair pushes was counted manually by visual inspection and with the Apple Watch. Difference between the Apple Watch and the rater was analyzed with mean absolute percent error (MAPE) and a Bland-Altman plot. To compare the measurement error of Series 4 and an older generation of the device a <i>t</i>-test was calculated using data for Series 1 from a former study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average of differences was 12.33 pushes (<i>n</i> = 15), whereas participants pushed the wheelchair 138.4 times on average (range 86-271 pushes). The range of difference and the Bland-Altman plot indicate an overestimation by Apple Watch. MAPE is 9.20% and the <i>t</i>-test, testing for an effect of Series 4 on the percentage of error compared with Series 1, was significant with <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Series 4 shows a significant improvement in measurement performance compared with Series 1. Series 4 can be considered as a promising data source to capture the number of wheelchair pushes on even grounds. Future research should analyze the long-term measurement performance during everyday conditions of Series 4.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e103-e110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714299/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740236\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的身体活动水平(PA)对长期并发症有影响。目前,PA主要是通过面试来评估的。可穿戴活动追踪器是一种很有前途的工具,可以在日常条件下客观地测量PA。唯一现成的、为轮椅使用者提供具体测量方法的可穿戴活动追踪器是Apple Watch。目的:本研究分析了Apple Watch Series 4对轮椅使用者的测量性能,并将其与上一代设备进行了比较。方法:15名亚急性脊髓损伤患者在他们的第一个住院阶段使用轮椅进行测试。轮椅推的次数是通过目测和苹果手表手动计算的。用平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和Bland-Altman图分析Apple Watch和rater之间的差异。为了比较系列4和老一代设备的测量误差,使用以前研究中系列1的数据计算t检验。结果:平均差异为12.33次(n = 15),而参与者平均推轮椅138.4次(范围为86-271次)。差异范围和Bland-Altman图表明Apple Watch高估了这一数据。MAPE为9.20%,t检验检验系列4与系列1相比对误差百分比的影响,p显著。结论:系列4与系列1相比在测量性能上有显著提高。系列4可以被认为是一个很有前途的数据源,可以捕获在均匀地面上轮椅推动的数量。未来的研究应该分析4系在日常条件下的长期测量性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measurement Performance of Activity Measurements with Newer Generation of Apple Watch in Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury.

Measurement Performance of Activity Measurements with Newer Generation of Apple Watch in Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury.

Measurement Performance of Activity Measurements with Newer Generation of Apple Watch in Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury.

Measurement Performance of Activity Measurements with Newer Generation of Apple Watch in Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury.

Background: The level of physical activity (PA) of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) has an impact on long-term complications. Currently, PA is mostly assessed by interviews. Wearable activity trackers are promising tools to objectively measure PA under everyday conditions. The only off-the-shelf, wearable activity tracker with specific measures for wheelchair users is the Apple Watch.

Objectives: This study analyzes the measurement performance of Apple Watch Series 4 for wheelchair users and compares it with an earlier generation of the device.

Methods: Fifteen participants with subacute SCI during their first in-patient phase followed a test course using their wheelchair. The number of wheelchair pushes was counted manually by visual inspection and with the Apple Watch. Difference between the Apple Watch and the rater was analyzed with mean absolute percent error (MAPE) and a Bland-Altman plot. To compare the measurement error of Series 4 and an older generation of the device a t-test was calculated using data for Series 1 from a former study.

Results: The average of differences was 12.33 pushes (n = 15), whereas participants pushed the wheelchair 138.4 times on average (range 86-271 pushes). The range of difference and the Bland-Altman plot indicate an overestimation by Apple Watch. MAPE is 9.20% and the t-test, testing for an effect of Series 4 on the percentage of error compared with Series 1, was significant with p < 0.05.

Conclusion: Series 4 shows a significant improvement in measurement performance compared with Series 1. Series 4 can be considered as a promising data source to capture the number of wheelchair pushes on even grounds. Future research should analyze the long-term measurement performance during everyday conditions of Series 4.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信