2020年期间英格兰和威尔士按性别、邻里剥夺和地区划分的因COVID-19和其他死亡原因造成的额外寿命损失:一项基于登记的研究。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-15 eCollection Date: 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003904
Evangelos Kontopantelis, Mamas A Mamas, Roger T Webb, Ana Castro, Martin K Rutter, Chris P Gale, Darren M Ashcroft, Matthias Pierce, Kathryn M Abel, Gareth Price, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Harriette G C Van Spall, Michelle M Graham, Marcello Morciano, Glen P Martin, Matt Sutton, Tim Doran
{"title":"2020年期间英格兰和威尔士按性别、邻里剥夺和地区划分的因COVID-19和其他死亡原因造成的额外寿命损失:一项基于登记的研究。","authors":"Evangelos Kontopantelis,&nbsp;Mamas A Mamas,&nbsp;Roger T Webb,&nbsp;Ana Castro,&nbsp;Martin K Rutter,&nbsp;Chris P Gale,&nbsp;Darren M Ashcroft,&nbsp;Matthias Pierce,&nbsp;Kathryn M Abel,&nbsp;Gareth Price,&nbsp;Corinne Faivre-Finn,&nbsp;Harriette G C Van Spall,&nbsp;Michelle M Graham,&nbsp;Marcello Morciano,&nbsp;Glen P Martin,&nbsp;Matt Sutton,&nbsp;Tim Doran","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1003904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deaths in the first year of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in England and Wales were unevenly distributed socioeconomically and geographically. However, the full scale of inequalities may have been underestimated to date, as most measures of excess mortality do not adequately account for varying age profiles of deaths between social groups. We measured years of life lost (YLL) attributable to the pandemic, directly or indirectly, comparing mortality across geographic and socioeconomic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We used national mortality registers in England and Wales, from 27 December 2014 until 25 December 2020, covering 3,265,937 deaths. YLLs (main outcome) were calculated using 2019 single year sex-specific life tables for England and Wales. Interrupted time-series analyses, with panel time-series models, were used to estimate expected YLL by sex, geographical region, and deprivation quintile between 7 March 2020 and 25 December 2020 by cause: direct deaths (COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases), cardiovascular disease and diabetes, cancer, and other indirect deaths (all other causes). Excess YLL during the pandemic period were calculated by subtracting observed from expected values. Additional analyses focused on excess deaths for region and deprivation strata, by age-group. Between 7 March 2020 and 25 December 2020, there were an estimated 763,550 (95% CI: 696,826 to 830,273) excess YLL in England and Wales, equivalent to a 15% (95% CI: 14 to 16) increase in YLL compared to the equivalent time period in 2019. There was a strong deprivation gradient in all-cause excess YLL, with rates per 100,000 population ranging from 916 (95% CI: 820 to 1,012) for the least deprived quintile to 1,645 (95% CI: 1,472 to 1,819) for the most deprived. The differences in excess YLL between deprivation quintiles were greatest in younger age groups; for all-cause deaths, a mean of 9.1 years per death (95% CI: 8.2 to 10.0) were lost in the least deprived quintile, compared to 10.8 (95% CI: 10.0 to 11.6) in the most deprived; for COVID-19 and other respiratory deaths, a mean of 8.9 years per death (95% CI: 8.7 to 9.1) were lost in the least deprived quintile, compared to 11.2 (95% CI: 11.0 to 11.5) in the most deprived. For all-cause mortality, estimated deaths in the most deprived compared to the most affluent areas were much higher in younger age groups, but similar for those aged 85 or over. There was marked variability in both all-cause and direct excess YLL by region, with the highest rates in the North West. Limitations include the quasi-experimental nature of the research design and the requirement for accurate and timely recording.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we observed strong socioeconomic and geographical health inequalities in YLL, during the first calendar year of the COVID-19 pandemic. These were in line with long-standing existing inequalities in England and Wales, with the most deprived areas reporting the largest numbers in potential YLL.</p>","PeriodicalId":20368,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"19 2","pages":"e1003904"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8846534/pdf/","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excess years of life lost to COVID-19 and other causes of death by sex, neighbourhood deprivation, and region in England and Wales during 2020: A registry-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Evangelos Kontopantelis,&nbsp;Mamas A Mamas,&nbsp;Roger T Webb,&nbsp;Ana Castro,&nbsp;Martin K Rutter,&nbsp;Chris P Gale,&nbsp;Darren M Ashcroft,&nbsp;Matthias Pierce,&nbsp;Kathryn M Abel,&nbsp;Gareth Price,&nbsp;Corinne Faivre-Finn,&nbsp;Harriette G C Van Spall,&nbsp;Michelle M Graham,&nbsp;Marcello Morciano,&nbsp;Glen P Martin,&nbsp;Matt Sutton,&nbsp;Tim Doran\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pmed.1003904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deaths in the first year of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in England and Wales were unevenly distributed socioeconomically and geographically. However, the full scale of inequalities may have been underestimated to date, as most measures of excess mortality do not adequately account for varying age profiles of deaths between social groups. We measured years of life lost (YLL) attributable to the pandemic, directly or indirectly, comparing mortality across geographic and socioeconomic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We used national mortality registers in England and Wales, from 27 December 2014 until 25 December 2020, covering 3,265,937 deaths. YLLs (main outcome) were calculated using 2019 single year sex-specific life tables for England and Wales. Interrupted time-series analyses, with panel time-series models, were used to estimate expected YLL by sex, geographical region, and deprivation quintile between 7 March 2020 and 25 December 2020 by cause: direct deaths (COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases), cardiovascular disease and diabetes, cancer, and other indirect deaths (all other causes). Excess YLL during the pandemic period were calculated by subtracting observed from expected values. Additional analyses focused on excess deaths for region and deprivation strata, by age-group. Between 7 March 2020 and 25 December 2020, there were an estimated 763,550 (95% CI: 696,826 to 830,273) excess YLL in England and Wales, equivalent to a 15% (95% CI: 14 to 16) increase in YLL compared to the equivalent time period in 2019. There was a strong deprivation gradient in all-cause excess YLL, with rates per 100,000 population ranging from 916 (95% CI: 820 to 1,012) for the least deprived quintile to 1,645 (95% CI: 1,472 to 1,819) for the most deprived. The differences in excess YLL between deprivation quintiles were greatest in younger age groups; for all-cause deaths, a mean of 9.1 years per death (95% CI: 8.2 to 10.0) were lost in the least deprived quintile, compared to 10.8 (95% CI: 10.0 to 11.6) in the most deprived; for COVID-19 and other respiratory deaths, a mean of 8.9 years per death (95% CI: 8.7 to 9.1) were lost in the least deprived quintile, compared to 11.2 (95% CI: 11.0 to 11.5) in the most deprived. For all-cause mortality, estimated deaths in the most deprived compared to the most affluent areas were much higher in younger age groups, but similar for those aged 85 or over. There was marked variability in both all-cause and direct excess YLL by region, with the highest rates in the North West. Limitations include the quasi-experimental nature of the research design and the requirement for accurate and timely recording.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we observed strong socioeconomic and geographical health inequalities in YLL, during the first calendar year of the COVID-19 pandemic. These were in line with long-standing existing inequalities in England and Wales, with the most deprived areas reporting the largest numbers in potential YLL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"e1003904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8846534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003904\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003904","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行第一年,英格兰和威尔士的死亡人数在社会、经济和地理上分布不均匀。然而,迄今为止,不平等的全面程度可能被低估了,因为大多数关于超额死亡率的措施没有充分考虑到不同社会群体之间死亡的年龄分布。我们测量了直接或间接归因于大流行的生命损失年数(YLL),比较了不同地理和社会经济群体的死亡率。方法和结果:我们使用了2014年12月27日至2020年12月25日期间英格兰和威尔士的全国死亡率登记册,涵盖了3,265,937例死亡。使用2019年英格兰和威尔士的单年度性别特定生命表计算yls(主要结果)。使用小组时间序列模型进行中断时间序列分析,按性别、地理区域和贫困五分位数估计2020年3月7日至2020年12月25日期间的预期YLL,按原因分列:直接死亡(COVID-19和其他呼吸道疾病)、心血管疾病和糖尿病、癌症和其他间接死亡(所有其他原因)。用期望值减去观测值来计算大流行期间的过量YLL。其他分析侧重于按年龄组划分的区域和贫困阶层的超额死亡。在2020年3月7日至2020年12月25日期间,英格兰和威尔士估计有763,550例(95% CI: 696,826至830,273)多余的YLL,相当于与2019年同期相比增加了15% (95% CI: 14至16)。在全因过量的YLL中存在很强的剥夺梯度,每10万人中最贫困的五分位数为916人(95% CI: 820至1,012),最贫困的五分位数为1,645人(95% CI: 1,472至1,819)。剥夺五分位数之间的超额YLL差异在年轻年龄组中最大;对于全因死亡,在最贫困的五分位数中,每例死亡平均损失9.1年(95% CI: 8.2至10.0),而在最贫困的五分位数中,每例死亡平均损失10.8年(95% CI: 10.0至11.6);对于COVID-19和其他呼吸系统死亡,在最贫困的五分之一人群中,每例死亡平均损失8.9年(95% CI: 8.7至9.1),而在最贫困的五分之一人群中,这一数字为11.2年(95% CI: 11.0至11.5)。就全因死亡率而言,与最富裕地区相比,最贫困地区较年轻年龄组的估计死亡率要高得多,但85岁或以上年龄组的估计死亡率相似。各地区的全因和直接过量YLL均有显著差异,西北地区的比率最高。限制包括研究设计的准实验性质以及对准确和及时记录的要求。结论:在本研究中,我们观察到在COVID-19大流行的第一个日历年中,YLL存在强烈的社会经济和地理卫生不平等。这与英格兰和威尔士长期存在的不平等现象是一致的,最贫困的地区报告的潜在YLL人数最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Excess years of life lost to COVID-19 and other causes of death by sex, neighbourhood deprivation, and region in England and Wales during 2020: A registry-based study.

Background: Deaths in the first year of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in England and Wales were unevenly distributed socioeconomically and geographically. However, the full scale of inequalities may have been underestimated to date, as most measures of excess mortality do not adequately account for varying age profiles of deaths between social groups. We measured years of life lost (YLL) attributable to the pandemic, directly or indirectly, comparing mortality across geographic and socioeconomic groups.

Methods and findings: We used national mortality registers in England and Wales, from 27 December 2014 until 25 December 2020, covering 3,265,937 deaths. YLLs (main outcome) were calculated using 2019 single year sex-specific life tables for England and Wales. Interrupted time-series analyses, with panel time-series models, were used to estimate expected YLL by sex, geographical region, and deprivation quintile between 7 March 2020 and 25 December 2020 by cause: direct deaths (COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases), cardiovascular disease and diabetes, cancer, and other indirect deaths (all other causes). Excess YLL during the pandemic period were calculated by subtracting observed from expected values. Additional analyses focused on excess deaths for region and deprivation strata, by age-group. Between 7 March 2020 and 25 December 2020, there were an estimated 763,550 (95% CI: 696,826 to 830,273) excess YLL in England and Wales, equivalent to a 15% (95% CI: 14 to 16) increase in YLL compared to the equivalent time period in 2019. There was a strong deprivation gradient in all-cause excess YLL, with rates per 100,000 population ranging from 916 (95% CI: 820 to 1,012) for the least deprived quintile to 1,645 (95% CI: 1,472 to 1,819) for the most deprived. The differences in excess YLL between deprivation quintiles were greatest in younger age groups; for all-cause deaths, a mean of 9.1 years per death (95% CI: 8.2 to 10.0) were lost in the least deprived quintile, compared to 10.8 (95% CI: 10.0 to 11.6) in the most deprived; for COVID-19 and other respiratory deaths, a mean of 8.9 years per death (95% CI: 8.7 to 9.1) were lost in the least deprived quintile, compared to 11.2 (95% CI: 11.0 to 11.5) in the most deprived. For all-cause mortality, estimated deaths in the most deprived compared to the most affluent areas were much higher in younger age groups, but similar for those aged 85 or over. There was marked variability in both all-cause and direct excess YLL by region, with the highest rates in the North West. Limitations include the quasi-experimental nature of the research design and the requirement for accurate and timely recording.

Conclusions: In this study, we observed strong socioeconomic and geographical health inequalities in YLL, during the first calendar year of the COVID-19 pandemic. These were in line with long-standing existing inequalities in England and Wales, with the most deprived areas reporting the largest numbers in potential YLL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine aims to be a leading platform for research and analysis on the global health challenges faced by humanity. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedicine, the environment, society, and politics, that affect the well-being of individuals worldwide. It particularly highlights studies that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or our understanding of disease mechanisms, with the ultimate goal of improving health outcomes in diverse settings. Unwavering in its commitment to ethical standards, PLOS Medicine ensures integrity in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and transparently disclosing any conflicts of interest during the reporting, peer review, and publication processes. The journal promotes transparency by providing visibility into the review and publication procedures. It also encourages data sharing and the reuse of published work. Author rights are upheld, allowing them to retain copyright. Furthermore, PLOS Medicine strongly supports Open Access publishing, making research articles freely available to all without restrictions, facilitating widespread dissemination of knowledge. The journal does not endorse drug or medical device advertising and refrains from exclusive sales of reprints to avoid conflicts of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信