肩关节置换术后内旋改善或丧失的相关因素

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Eric Rohman MD , Joseph J. King MD , Christopher P. Roche MSE, MBA , Wen Fan MS , Christopher M. Kilian MD , Rick F. Papandrea MD
{"title":"肩关节置换术后内旋改善或丧失的相关因素","authors":"Eric Rohman MD ,&nbsp;Joseph J. King MD ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Roche MSE, MBA ,&nbsp;Wen Fan MS ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Kilian MD ,&nbsp;Rick F. Papandrea MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and identifies the patient, implant, and operative factors associated with IR loss or gain at 2-year minimum follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 1978 primary rTSA patients were analyzed from an international database of a single rTSA prosthesis to quantify IR at 2 years’ minimum follow-up. rTSA patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preoperative IR score, with group 1 patients having less active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≤3 and group 2 patients having greater active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≥4 (ie, L5 or higher). For both group 1 and 2 patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the risk factors associated with IR loss after rTSA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 58.9% of rTSA patients experienced IR improvement and 17.0% lost IR after rTSA. The occurrence of IR loss or gain was dependent on preoperative IR score, as 73.2% of group 1 patients improved IR and only 40.1% of group 2 patients improved IR, whereas 31.0% of group 2 patients lost IR and only 6.3% of group 1 patients lost IR after rTSA. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified. For group 1 patients, male sex (<em>P</em> = .004, odds ratio [OR] = 2.056), tobacco usage (<em>P</em> = .004, OR = 0.348), larger humeral stem diameter (<em>P</em> = .008, OR = 0.852), and not having subscapularis repaired (<em>P</em> = .002, OR = 2.654) were significant risk factors for IR loss. For group 2 patients, male sex (<em>P</em><span> = .005, OR = 1.656), higher body mass index (</span><em>P</em><span> = .002, OR = 0.946), a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .001, OR = 2.189), nonaugmented baseplate usage (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, OR = 2.116), and not having subscapularis repaired (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, OR = 3.052) were significant risk factors for IR loss.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The majority of patients improve IR after rTSA in the nonfracture setting. rTSA patients with substantial IR prior to surgery had a greater probability for losing IR compared to patients with poor preoperative IR. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified; these risk factors are useful for counseling patients considering rTSA, as some patients are more likely to lose IR than others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"31 7","pages":"Pages e346-e358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Eric Rohman MD ,&nbsp;Joseph J. King MD ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Roche MSE, MBA ,&nbsp;Wen Fan MS ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Kilian MD ,&nbsp;Rick F. Papandrea MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and identifies the patient, implant, and operative factors associated with IR loss or gain at 2-year minimum follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 1978 primary rTSA patients were analyzed from an international database of a single rTSA prosthesis to quantify IR at 2 years’ minimum follow-up. rTSA patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preoperative IR score, with group 1 patients having less active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≤3 and group 2 patients having greater active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≥4 (ie, L5 or higher). For both group 1 and 2 patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the risk factors associated with IR loss after rTSA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 58.9% of rTSA patients experienced IR improvement and 17.0% lost IR after rTSA. The occurrence of IR loss or gain was dependent on preoperative IR score, as 73.2% of group 1 patients improved IR and only 40.1% of group 2 patients improved IR, whereas 31.0% of group 2 patients lost IR and only 6.3% of group 1 patients lost IR after rTSA. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified. For group 1 patients, male sex (<em>P</em> = .004, odds ratio [OR] = 2.056), tobacco usage (<em>P</em> = .004, OR = 0.348), larger humeral stem diameter (<em>P</em> = .008, OR = 0.852), and not having subscapularis repaired (<em>P</em> = .002, OR = 2.654) were significant risk factors for IR loss. For group 2 patients, male sex (<em>P</em><span> = .005, OR = 1.656), higher body mass index (</span><em>P</em><span> = .002, OR = 0.946), a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .001, OR = 2.189), nonaugmented baseplate usage (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, OR = 2.116), and not having subscapularis repaired (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, OR = 3.052) were significant risk factors for IR loss.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The majority of patients improve IR after rTSA in the nonfracture setting. rTSA patients with substantial IR prior to surgery had a greater probability for losing IR compared to patients with poor preoperative IR. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified; these risk factors are useful for counseling patients considering rTSA, as some patients are more likely to lose IR than others.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages e346-e358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105827462200218X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105827462200218X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)的内旋(IR)是不可预测的。确定与IR丧失或改善相关的因素有助于术前患者咨询。本研究量化了非骨折指征的rTSA患者的IR变化,并在至少2年的随访中确定了患者、植入物和手术因素与IR损失或增加相关。方法从单个rTSA假体的国际数据库中对1978例原发性rTSA患者进行分析,以量化最少随访2年的IR。rTSA患者根据术前IR评分分为2组,1组患者的活跃IR较低(术前IR评分≤3),2组患者的活跃IR较高(术前IR评分≥4)(即L5或更高)。对于第1组和第2组患者,进行单因素和多因素分析,以量化与rTSA后IR丧失相关的危险因素。结果总体而言,58.9%的rTSA患者在rTSA后IR改善,17.0%的rTSA患者IR消失。IR损失或增加的发生取决于术前IR评分,在rTSA后,73.2%的1组患者IR得到改善,而只有40.1%的2组患者IR得到改善,而31.0%的2组患者IR消失,只有6.3%的1组患者IR消失。确定了许多IR损失的危险因素。对于1组患者,男性(P = 0.004,优势比[OR] = 2.056)、吸烟(P = 0.004, OR = 0.348)、肱骨干直径较大(P = 0.008, OR = 0.852)、未修复肩胛下肌(P = 0.002, OR = 2.654)是IR损失的显著危险因素。2组患者性别为男性(P = 0.005, OR = 1.656),体质指数较高(P = 0.002, OR = 0.946),非骨关节炎诊断(P <.001, OR = 2.189),非增强底板使用(P <.001, OR = 2.116),肩胛下肌未修复(P <.001, OR = 3.052)是IR损失的重要危险因素。结论在非骨折情况下,rTSA后大多数患者IR得到改善。与术前IR较差的患者相比,术前有大量IR的rTSA患者失去IR的可能性更大。确定了IR损失的许多危险因素;这些风险因素对考虑rTSA的患者进行咨询是有用的,因为一些患者比其他患者更容易失去IR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and identifies the patient, implant, and operative factors associated with IR loss or gain at 2-year minimum follow-up.

Methods

A total of 1978 primary rTSA patients were analyzed from an international database of a single rTSA prosthesis to quantify IR at 2 years’ minimum follow-up. rTSA patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preoperative IR score, with group 1 patients having less active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≤3 and group 2 patients having greater active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≥4 (ie, L5 or higher). For both group 1 and 2 patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the risk factors associated with IR loss after rTSA.

Results

Overall, 58.9% of rTSA patients experienced IR improvement and 17.0% lost IR after rTSA. The occurrence of IR loss or gain was dependent on preoperative IR score, as 73.2% of group 1 patients improved IR and only 40.1% of group 2 patients improved IR, whereas 31.0% of group 2 patients lost IR and only 6.3% of group 1 patients lost IR after rTSA. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified. For group 1 patients, male sex (P = .004, odds ratio [OR] = 2.056), tobacco usage (P = .004, OR = 0.348), larger humeral stem diameter (P = .008, OR = 0.852), and not having subscapularis repaired (P = .002, OR = 2.654) were significant risk factors for IR loss. For group 2 patients, male sex (P = .005, OR = 1.656), higher body mass index (P = .002, OR = 0.946), a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (P < .001, OR = 2.189), nonaugmented baseplate usage (P < .001, OR = 2.116), and not having subscapularis repaired (P < .001, OR = 3.052) were significant risk factors for IR loss.

Conclusion

The majority of patients improve IR after rTSA in the nonfracture setting. rTSA patients with substantial IR prior to surgery had a greater probability for losing IR compared to patients with poor preoperative IR. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified; these risk factors are useful for counseling patients considering rTSA, as some patients are more likely to lose IR than others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信