Christina Tran, Andrew A Crawford, Alexander Hamilton, Clare E French, Yvonne Wren, Jonathan Sandy, Gemma Sharp
{"title":"围孕期产妇压力生活事件与口腔面部裂:系统回顾与meta分析。","authors":"Christina Tran, Andrew A Crawford, Alexander Hamilton, Clare E French, Yvonne Wren, Jonathan Sandy, Gemma Sharp","doi":"10.1177/10556656211045553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether women who experience stressful life events during the periconceptional period are at higher risk of giving birth to a baby with an orofacial cleft (OFC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the proportion of babies born with OFC to mothers exposed and unexposed to population-level or personal-level stressful life events during the periconceptional period. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Odds ratios (ORs) for the odds of OFC in babies of exposed mothers relative to unexposed controls were extracted and/or calculated. Random effects meta-analysis was undertaken, stratified by cleft subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 12 eligible studies, 8 examined experience of personal events and 4 examined population-level events. Studies demonstrated low-moderate risk of bias and there was indication of publication bias. There was some evidence that personal stressful life events were associated with greater odds of cleft lip and/or palate (six studies, OR 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16, 2.30, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and cleft palate only (six studies, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.06, <i>P</i> = 0.04). Population-level events were associated with higher odds of OFC in studies that did not specify subtype (three studies, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19, 2.25, <i>P</i> = 0.002), but subtype stratified analyses were underpowered. Heterogeneity was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited evidence indicated a weak positive association between maternal stressful life events during the periconceptional period and risk of OFC in the offspring, but further studies with greater consistency in research design are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520794,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","volume":" ","pages":"1253-1263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal Stressful Life Events During the Periconceptional Period and Orofacial Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Tran, Andrew A Crawford, Alexander Hamilton, Clare E French, Yvonne Wren, Jonathan Sandy, Gemma Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656211045553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether women who experience stressful life events during the periconceptional period are at higher risk of giving birth to a baby with an orofacial cleft (OFC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the proportion of babies born with OFC to mothers exposed and unexposed to population-level or personal-level stressful life events during the periconceptional period. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Odds ratios (ORs) for the odds of OFC in babies of exposed mothers relative to unexposed controls were extracted and/or calculated. Random effects meta-analysis was undertaken, stratified by cleft subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 12 eligible studies, 8 examined experience of personal events and 4 examined population-level events. Studies demonstrated low-moderate risk of bias and there was indication of publication bias. There was some evidence that personal stressful life events were associated with greater odds of cleft lip and/or palate (six studies, OR 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16, 2.30, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and cleft palate only (six studies, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.06, <i>P</i> = 0.04). Population-level events were associated with higher odds of OFC in studies that did not specify subtype (three studies, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19, 2.25, <i>P</i> = 0.002), but subtype stratified analyses were underpowered. Heterogeneity was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited evidence indicated a weak positive association between maternal stressful life events during the periconceptional period and risk of OFC in the offspring, but further studies with greater consistency in research design are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1253-1263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211045553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211045553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估在围孕期经历压力生活事件的妇女是否有更高的风险生下患有口腔面部唇裂(OFC)的婴儿。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析报告在围孕期暴露于人群水平或个人水平压力生活事件的母亲和未暴露于人群水平或个人水平压力生活事件的母亲所生OFC婴儿比例的研究。从成立到2020年8月检索了6个电子数据库。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。提取和/或计算暴露母亲的婴儿相对于未暴露对照组的OFC几率的比值比(ORs)。进行随机效应荟萃分析,按裂口亚型分层。结果:在12项符合条件的研究中,8项检查个人事件的经历,4项检查人群水平的事件。研究显示有中低偏倚风险,并有发表偏倚的迹象。有一些证据表明,个人压力生活事件与唇裂和/或腭裂的几率较大(6项研究,or 1.63, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.16, 2.30, P = 0.001)和腭裂仅相关(6项研究,or 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.06, P = 0.04)。在没有指定亚型的研究中,人群水平的事件与较高的OFC发生率相关(3项研究,OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19, 2.25, P = 0.002),但亚型分层分析的效力不足。异质性高。结论:有限的证据表明,围孕期母亲压力生活事件与后代OFC风险之间存在微弱的正相关关系,但需要进一步的研究,以提高研究设计的一致性。
Maternal Stressful Life Events During the Periconceptional Period and Orofacial Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objective: To assess whether women who experience stressful life events during the periconceptional period are at higher risk of giving birth to a baby with an orofacial cleft (OFC).
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the proportion of babies born with OFC to mothers exposed and unexposed to population-level or personal-level stressful life events during the periconceptional period. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Odds ratios (ORs) for the odds of OFC in babies of exposed mothers relative to unexposed controls were extracted and/or calculated. Random effects meta-analysis was undertaken, stratified by cleft subtype.
Results: Of 12 eligible studies, 8 examined experience of personal events and 4 examined population-level events. Studies demonstrated low-moderate risk of bias and there was indication of publication bias. There was some evidence that personal stressful life events were associated with greater odds of cleft lip and/or palate (six studies, OR 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16, 2.30, P = 0.001) and cleft palate only (six studies, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.06, P = 0.04). Population-level events were associated with higher odds of OFC in studies that did not specify subtype (three studies, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19, 2.25, P = 0.002), but subtype stratified analyses were underpowered. Heterogeneity was high.
Conclusions: Limited evidence indicated a weak positive association between maternal stressful life events during the periconceptional period and risk of OFC in the offspring, but further studies with greater consistency in research design are needed.