突尼斯对药物流产的无知:在国家政策、医疗反对、父权逻辑和伊斯兰复兴之间

Q1 Social Sciences
Irene Maffi
{"title":"突尼斯对药物流产的无知:在国家政策、医疗反对、父权逻辑和伊斯兰复兴之间","authors":"Irene Maffi","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Tunisia, medication abortion has been available in government reproductive and sexual health clinics since the early 2000s. Since its introduction, it has rapidly replaced the surgical method, and between 75% and 80% of abortions in the public sector were performed using the pharmacological protocol in 2016. In this article, I intend to discuss the various forms of ignorance about medication abortion that exist in Tunisia among several categories of actors in relation to the legal, medical and religious domains. I explore how the existing ‘varieties of ignorance’ are related to the specific political, social and economic positions of the involved actors, the dominant gender regime, specific institutional policies and economic interests. I also investigate how some forms of ignorance are wilfully produced by institutions and individuals, whereas others are the result of positionality or organizational features. I first describe when and how medication abortion was introduced in Tunisia and the forms of resistance it elicited; later, I examine the production of ignorance about this technology after the revolution of 2011. I mainly consider practices and discourses of health professionals, but also those of women seeking abortion care in the public sector, and those of the activists of a Tunisian non-governmental organization operating in the domain of women’s health and rights.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 111-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The production of ignorance about medication abortion in Tunisia: between state policies, medical opposition, patriarchal logics and Islamic revival\",\"authors\":\"Irene Maffi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In Tunisia, medication abortion has been available in government reproductive and sexual health clinics since the early 2000s. Since its introduction, it has rapidly replaced the surgical method, and between 75% and 80% of abortions in the public sector were performed using the pharmacological protocol in 2016. In this article, I intend to discuss the various forms of ignorance about medication abortion that exist in Tunisia among several categories of actors in relation to the legal, medical and religious domains. I explore how the existing ‘varieties of ignorance’ are related to the specific political, social and economic positions of the involved actors, the dominant gender regime, specific institutional policies and economic interests. I also investigate how some forms of ignorance are wilfully produced by institutions and individuals, whereas others are the result of positionality or organizational features. I first describe when and how medication abortion was introduced in Tunisia and the forms of resistance it elicited; later, I examine the production of ignorance about this technology after the revolution of 2011. I mainly consider practices and discourses of health professionals, but also those of women seeking abortion care in the public sector, and those of the activists of a Tunisian non-governmental organization operating in the domain of women’s health and rights.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 111-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717451/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在突尼斯,自2000年代初以来,政府的生殖和性健康诊所就提供药物流产服务。自引入以来,它已迅速取代了手术方法,2016年,公共部门75%至80%的堕胎是使用药理学方案进行的。在本文中,我打算讨论突尼斯在法律、医疗和宗教领域的几类行为者中存在的对药物流产的各种形式的无知。我探讨了现存的“各种无知”是如何与相关行动者的特定政治、社会和经济地位、占主导地位的性别制度、特定的制度政策和经济利益相关联的。我还研究了某些形式的无知是如何由机构和个人故意产生的,而其他形式的无知则是位置性或组织特征的结果。我首先描述了突尼斯何时以及如何引入药物流产,以及它引发的抵制形式;之后,我考察了2011年革命后对这项技术的无知。我主要考虑保健专业人员的做法和言论,但也考虑在公共部门寻求堕胎护理的妇女的做法和言论,以及在妇女健康和权利领域开展活动的突尼斯非政府组织的活动家的做法和言论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The production of ignorance about medication abortion in Tunisia: between state policies, medical opposition, patriarchal logics and Islamic revival

The production of ignorance about medication abortion in Tunisia: between state policies, medical opposition, patriarchal logics and Islamic revival

In Tunisia, medication abortion has been available in government reproductive and sexual health clinics since the early 2000s. Since its introduction, it has rapidly replaced the surgical method, and between 75% and 80% of abortions in the public sector were performed using the pharmacological protocol in 2016. In this article, I intend to discuss the various forms of ignorance about medication abortion that exist in Tunisia among several categories of actors in relation to the legal, medical and religious domains. I explore how the existing ‘varieties of ignorance’ are related to the specific political, social and economic positions of the involved actors, the dominant gender regime, specific institutional policies and economic interests. I also investigate how some forms of ignorance are wilfully produced by institutions and individuals, whereas others are the result of positionality or organizational features. I first describe when and how medication abortion was introduced in Tunisia and the forms of resistance it elicited; later, I examine the production of ignorance about this technology after the revolution of 2011. I mainly consider practices and discourses of health professionals, but also those of women seeking abortion care in the public sector, and those of the activists of a Tunisian non-governmental organization operating in the domain of women’s health and rights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信