从健康保险索赔数据预测医院再入院:针对潜在不适当处方的建模研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Methods of Information in Medicine Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1742671
Alexander Gerharz, Carmen Ruff, Lucas Wirbka, Felicitas Stoll, Walter E Haefeli, Andreas Groll, Andreas D Meid
{"title":"从健康保险索赔数据预测医院再入院:针对潜在不适当处方的建模研究。","authors":"Alexander Gerharz,&nbsp;Carmen Ruff,&nbsp;Lucas Wirbka,&nbsp;Felicitas Stoll,&nbsp;Walter E Haefeli,&nbsp;Andreas Groll,&nbsp;Andreas D Meid","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous prediction models for readmissions are developed from hospital data whose predictor variables are based on specific data fields that are often not transferable to other settings. In contrast, routine data from statutory health insurances (in Germany) are highly standardized, ubiquitously available, and would thus allow for automatic identification of readmission risks.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and internally validate prediction models for readmissions based on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in six diseases from routine data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a large database of German statutory health insurance claims, we detected disease-specific readmissions after index admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), a composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack or atrial fibrillation (S/AF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and osteoporosis (OS). PIP at the index admission was determined by the STOPP/START criteria (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment) which were candidate variables in regularized prediction models for specific readmission within 90 days. The risks from disease-specific models were combined (\"stacked\") to predict all-cause readmission within 90 days. Validation performance was measured by the c-statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the prevalence of START criteria was higher than for STOPP criteria, more single STOPP criteria were selected into models for specific readmissions. Performance in validation samples was the highest for DM (c-statistics: 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.70]), followed by COPD (c-statistics: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.64-0.67]), S/AF (c-statistics: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.63-0.66]), HF (c-statistics: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.60-0.62]), AMI (c-statistics: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.56-0.60]), and OS (c-statistics: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.47-0.56]). Integrating risks from disease-specific models to a combined model for all-cause readmission yielded a c-statistics of 0.63 [95% CI: 0.63-0.64].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIP successfully predicted readmissions for most diseases, opening the possibility for interventions to improve these modifiable risk factors. Machine-learning methods appear promising for future modeling of PIP predictors in complex older patients with many underlying diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Hospital Readmissions from Health Insurance Claims Data: A Modeling Study Targeting Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Gerharz,&nbsp;Carmen Ruff,&nbsp;Lucas Wirbka,&nbsp;Felicitas Stoll,&nbsp;Walter E Haefeli,&nbsp;Andreas Groll,&nbsp;Andreas D Meid\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1742671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous prediction models for readmissions are developed from hospital data whose predictor variables are based on specific data fields that are often not transferable to other settings. In contrast, routine data from statutory health insurances (in Germany) are highly standardized, ubiquitously available, and would thus allow for automatic identification of readmission risks.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and internally validate prediction models for readmissions based on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in six diseases from routine data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a large database of German statutory health insurance claims, we detected disease-specific readmissions after index admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), a composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack or atrial fibrillation (S/AF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and osteoporosis (OS). PIP at the index admission was determined by the STOPP/START criteria (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment) which were candidate variables in regularized prediction models for specific readmission within 90 days. The risks from disease-specific models were combined (\\\"stacked\\\") to predict all-cause readmission within 90 days. Validation performance was measured by the c-statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the prevalence of START criteria was higher than for STOPP criteria, more single STOPP criteria were selected into models for specific readmissions. Performance in validation samples was the highest for DM (c-statistics: 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.70]), followed by COPD (c-statistics: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.64-0.67]), S/AF (c-statistics: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.63-0.66]), HF (c-statistics: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.60-0.62]), AMI (c-statistics: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.56-0.60]), and OS (c-statistics: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.47-0.56]). Integrating risks from disease-specific models to a combined model for all-cause readmission yielded a c-statistics of 0.63 [95% CI: 0.63-0.64].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIP successfully predicted readmissions for most diseases, opening the possibility for interventions to improve these modifiable risk factors. Machine-learning methods appear promising for future modeling of PIP predictors in complex older patients with many underlying diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"55-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods of Information in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742671\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:许多再入院预测模型是根据医院数据开发的,其预测变量基于特定的数据字段,通常不能转移到其他设置。相比之下,来自法定健康保险的常规数据(在德国)是高度标准化的,无处不在,因此可以自动识别再入院风险。目的:从常规数据中开发并内部验证基于潜在不适当处方(PIP)的六种疾病再入院预测模型。方法:在一个大型的德国法定健康保险索赔数据库中,我们检测了急性心肌梗死(AMI)、心力衰竭(HF)、中风、短暂性脑缺血发作或心房颤动(S/AF)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、2型糖尿病(DM)和骨质疏松症(OS)在指数入院后的疾病特异性再入院。指数入院时的PIP由STOPP/START标准(老年人处方筛选工具/提醒医生正确治疗的筛选工具)确定,这是90天内特定再入院的正则化预测模型的候选变量。来自特定疾病模型的风险被组合(“堆叠”)以预测90天内的全因再入院。验证性能通过c-statistics来衡量。结果:虽然START标准的流行率高于STOPP标准,但更多的单一STOPP标准被选为特定再入院的模型。验证样本中的表现最高的是DM (c-statistics: 0.68[95%可信区间(CI): 0.66-0.70]),其次是COPD (c-statistics: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.64-0.67])、S/AF (c-statistics: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.63-0.66])、HF (c-statistics: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.60-0.62])、AMI (c-statistics: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.56- 0.56])和OS (c-statistics: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.47-0.56])。将疾病特异性模型的风险整合到全因再入院的联合模型中,c统计量为0.63 [95% CI: 0.63-0.64]。结论:PIP成功预测了大多数疾病的再入院,为干预改善这些可改变的危险因素开辟了可能性。机器学习方法在具有许多潜在疾病的复杂老年患者的PIP预测因子的未来建模中显得很有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Hospital Readmissions from Health Insurance Claims Data: A Modeling Study Targeting Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing.

Background: Numerous prediction models for readmissions are developed from hospital data whose predictor variables are based on specific data fields that are often not transferable to other settings. In contrast, routine data from statutory health insurances (in Germany) are highly standardized, ubiquitously available, and would thus allow for automatic identification of readmission risks.

Objectives: To develop and internally validate prediction models for readmissions based on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in six diseases from routine data.

Methods: In a large database of German statutory health insurance claims, we detected disease-specific readmissions after index admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), a composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack or atrial fibrillation (S/AF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and osteoporosis (OS). PIP at the index admission was determined by the STOPP/START criteria (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment) which were candidate variables in regularized prediction models for specific readmission within 90 days. The risks from disease-specific models were combined ("stacked") to predict all-cause readmission within 90 days. Validation performance was measured by the c-statistics.

Results: While the prevalence of START criteria was higher than for STOPP criteria, more single STOPP criteria were selected into models for specific readmissions. Performance in validation samples was the highest for DM (c-statistics: 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.70]), followed by COPD (c-statistics: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.64-0.67]), S/AF (c-statistics: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.63-0.66]), HF (c-statistics: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.60-0.62]), AMI (c-statistics: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.56-0.60]), and OS (c-statistics: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.47-0.56]). Integrating risks from disease-specific models to a combined model for all-cause readmission yielded a c-statistics of 0.63 [95% CI: 0.63-0.64].

Conclusion: PIP successfully predicted readmissions for most diseases, opening the possibility for interventions to improve these modifiable risk factors. Machine-learning methods appear promising for future modeling of PIP predictors in complex older patients with many underlying diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信