南非林波波地区医院助产妇女的经验和看法。

Q2 Medicine
Joy V Summerton, Tsakani R Mtileni, Maphei E Moshabela
{"title":"南非林波波地区医院助产妇女的经验和看法。","authors":"Joy V Summerton,&nbsp;Tsakani R Mtileni,&nbsp;Maphei E Moshabela","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v44i1.2186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa has included birth companions in its national guidelines for maternity care and the revised Maternity Case Record, in and effort to improve the quality and experience of care. However, reservations amongst healthcare providers remain about the acceptability of birth companions in the labour ward.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To document the experiences and perceptions of birth companions who supported women in labour in a rural hospital in Limpopo Province where a Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) project was piloted.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study design was employed. Purposive sampling was employed where all birth companions who supported a woman during labour and birth were included in the study. The experiences and perceptions of birth companions were captured using a birth companion feedback book during the period of 1st April to 30th August 2019. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one (71) of the 73 birth companions only had positive responses about the birthing experience and how both the birth companion and woman in labour were treated. Two birth companions were dissatisfied with the treatment provided by the midwife that supported the birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important for healthcare providers to understand the far reaching emotional and psychological impact of their attitudes and behaviour on, not only women in labour but also on others who witness their (healthcare providers) behaviour. Mechanisms to obtain feedback from birth companions should be integrated into strategies to improve the quality and experience of care for women during childbirth.</p>","PeriodicalId":35715,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"44 1","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603091/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and perceptions of birth companions supporting women in labour at a District Hospital in Limpopo, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Joy V Summerton,&nbsp;Tsakani R Mtileni,&nbsp;Maphei E Moshabela\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/curationis.v44i1.2186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa has included birth companions in its national guidelines for maternity care and the revised Maternity Case Record, in and effort to improve the quality and experience of care. However, reservations amongst healthcare providers remain about the acceptability of birth companions in the labour ward.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To document the experiences and perceptions of birth companions who supported women in labour in a rural hospital in Limpopo Province where a Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) project was piloted.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study design was employed. Purposive sampling was employed where all birth companions who supported a woman during labour and birth were included in the study. The experiences and perceptions of birth companions were captured using a birth companion feedback book during the period of 1st April to 30th August 2019. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one (71) of the 73 birth companions only had positive responses about the birthing experience and how both the birth companion and woman in labour were treated. Two birth companions were dissatisfied with the treatment provided by the midwife that supported the birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important for healthcare providers to understand the far reaching emotional and psychological impact of their attitudes and behaviour on, not only women in labour but also on others who witness their (healthcare providers) behaviour. Mechanisms to obtain feedback from birth companions should be integrated into strategies to improve the quality and experience of care for women during childbirth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curationis\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curationis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v44i1.2186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v44i1.2186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:南非在其国家产妇护理指南和经修订的产妇病例记录中纳入了陪产人员,以努力提高护理质量和经验。然而,医疗保健提供者仍然对分娩病房陪产的可接受性持保留态度。目的:记录在林波波省农村医院支持分娩妇女的产伴的经验和看法,该医院试点了一个尊重产妇护理(RMC)项目。方法:采用基于机构的横断面研究设计。研究采用了有目的的抽样,所有在分娩和分娩过程中支持妇女的产伴都包括在研究中。在2019年4月1日至8月30日期间,使用产伴反馈书记录了产伴的经历和看法。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果:73名产伴中有71人对分娩经历以及产伴和产妇的待遇有积极的反应。两名陪产人员对支持分娩的助产士提供的治疗不满意。结论:卫生保健提供者必须了解他们的态度和行为不仅对分娩妇女,而且对目睹他们(卫生保健提供者)行为的其他人产生深远的情感和心理影响。应将从产伴处获得反馈的机制纳入提高妇女分娩护理质量和经验的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences and perceptions of birth companions supporting women in labour at a District Hospital in Limpopo, South Africa.

Background: South Africa has included birth companions in its national guidelines for maternity care and the revised Maternity Case Record, in and effort to improve the quality and experience of care. However, reservations amongst healthcare providers remain about the acceptability of birth companions in the labour ward.

Objectives: To document the experiences and perceptions of birth companions who supported women in labour in a rural hospital in Limpopo Province where a Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) project was piloted.

Method: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was employed. Purposive sampling was employed where all birth companions who supported a woman during labour and birth were included in the study. The experiences and perceptions of birth companions were captured using a birth companion feedback book during the period of 1st April to 30th August 2019. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Results: Seventy-one (71) of the 73 birth companions only had positive responses about the birthing experience and how both the birth companion and woman in labour were treated. Two birth companions were dissatisfied with the treatment provided by the midwife that supported the birth.

Conclusion: It is important for healthcare providers to understand the far reaching emotional and psychological impact of their attitudes and behaviour on, not only women in labour but also on others who witness their (healthcare providers) behaviour. Mechanisms to obtain feedback from birth companions should be integrated into strategies to improve the quality and experience of care for women during childbirth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curationis
Curationis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信